Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:20:58.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling of grain refinement: Part III. Al–7Si–0.3Mg aluminum alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

X. Yao*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 QLD, Australia
S.D. McDonald
Affiliation:
CRC Centre for Metals Manufacturing (CAST) Cooperative Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 QLD, Australia
A.K. Dahle
Affiliation:
CRC Centre for Metals Manufacturing (CAST) Cooperative Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 QLD, Australia
C.J. Davidson
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIR)—Manufacturing & Infrastructure Technology, Kenmore, 4069 QLD, Australia
D.H. StJohn
Affiliation:
CRC Centre for Metals Manufacturing (CAST) Cooperative Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072 QLD, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: x.yao@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Following Part I [X. Yao, et al., J. Mater. Res.23(5), 1282 (2008)] and Part II [X. Yao, et al., J. Mater. Res.23(5), 1292 (2008)] the cellular automation–finite control volume method (CAFVM) model was used to study the grain formation and microstructure morphology resulting from solidification of a commercial Al–Si–Mg alloy with Al–Ti–B grain refiner additions. The model incorporates the effect of the introduced solute Ti and the alloying elements of Si and Mg on the growth restriction factor, constitutional undercooling, and nucleation parameters. With respect to grain refinement, it is found that the alloying elements, Si and Mg, play a role that is similar to Ti qualitatively while different quantitatively. Accordingly, a concept of “equivalent solute” determined by phase diagram parameters such as the solute partitioning coefficient and the liquidus slope is proposed to clarify the effect of each solute in the alloy on grain formation during solidification. Based on the calculations and on comparison to the experimental data, a possible mechanism of grain refinement in this alloy system is proposed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Mohanty, P.S.Gruzleski, J.E.: Mechanism of grain-refinement in aluminum. Acta Metall. Mater. 44, 3749 1996Google Scholar
2Kori, S.A., Murty, B.S.Chakraborty, M.: Development of an efficient grain refiner for Al–7Si alloy and its modification with strontium. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 280, 58 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Sigworth, G.K.Guzdwski, M.M.: Grain refining of hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys. AFS Trans. 93, 907 1985Google Scholar
4Tondel, P.A., Halvorsen, G.Arnberg, L.: Grain refinement of hypoeutectic Al–Si foundry alloys in Light Metals, edited by S.K. Das Metal. Soc. of AIME Warrendale, PA 1993 783Google Scholar
5Spittle, J.A.Sadli, S.: Effect of alloy variables on grain-refinement of binary aluminum-alloys with Al–Ti–B. Mater. Sci. Technol. 11, 533 1995Google Scholar
6Easton, M.A.StJohn, D.H.: A model of grain refinement incorporating alloy constitution and potency of heterogeneous nucleant particles. Acta Metall. Mater. 49, 1867 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hutt, J., StJohn, D.H., Hogan, L.Dahle, A.K.: Equiaxed solidification of Al–Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15, 495 1999Google Scholar
8Lee, Y.C., Dahle, A.K., StJohn, D.H.Hutt, J.E.C.: The effect of grain refinement and silicon content on grain formation in hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 259, 43 1999Google Scholar
9Quested, T.E., Dinsdale, A.T.Greer, A.L.: The effect of the size distribution of inoculant particles on as-cast grain size in aluminum alloys. Acta Mater. 52, 3859 2004Google Scholar
10Schaffer, P.L., Arnberg, L.Dahle, A.K.: Segregation of particles and its influence on the morphology of the eutectic silicon phase in Al–7 wt% Si alloys. Scripta Mater. 54, 1543 2006Google Scholar
11Suarez-Pena, B.Asensio-Lozano, J.: Influence of Sr modification and Ti grain refinement on the morphology of Fe-rich precipitates in eutectic Al–Si die cast alloys. Scripta Mater. 54, 1543 2006Google Scholar
12Dahle, A.K., Hutt, J.E.C., Lee, Y.C.StJohn, D.H.: Grain formation in hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys. AFS Trans. 107, 265 1999Google Scholar
13Lu, H.T., Wang, L.C.Kung, S.K.: The influence of grain refiner master alloy addition on A-356 aluminum alloy. J. Chinese Foundryman’s Assn. 29, 10 1981Google Scholar
14Guzowski, M.M., Sentner, D.A.Sigworth, G.K.: UK Patent No. GB2162540A,1986Google Scholar
15Desnain, P., Fautrelle, Y., Meyer, J-L., Requet, J-P.Durand, F.: Prediction of equiaxed grain density in multicomponent alloy, stirred electromagnetically. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 1513 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Yao, X., McDonald, S.D., Dahle, A.K., Davidson, C.J.StJohn, D.H.: Modeling of grain refinement: Part I. Effect of the solute titanium for aluminum. J. Mater. Res. 23(5), 1282 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Yao, X.: Modeling of microstructure formation during solidification.Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia (2006),Google Scholar
18Easton, M.StJohn, D.: Grain refinement of aluminum alloys: Part II. Confirmation of, and a mechanism for, the solute paradigm. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30, 1625 1999Google Scholar
19Yao, X., McDonald, S.D., Dahle, A.K., Davidson, C.J.StJohn, D.H.: Modeling of grain refinement: Part II. Effect of nucleant particles—TiB2 additions for aluminum. J. Mater. Res. 23(5), 1292 2008Google Scholar