Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:15:02.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nickel-coated carbon fiber-reinforced tin-lead alloy composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

C.T. Ho
C.T. Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yun-Lin Polytechnic Institute of Technology, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

Nickel is deposited over pristine, surface-treated, and brominated P-100 carbon fibers using cementation and electroplating techniques. The fibers are brominated by bromine vapor for 48 h and then desorbed at 200 °C in air for 12 h. The anodic oxidation treatment is performed by etching fibers electrochemically in a dilute sodium electrolyte for 3 min or by immersing fibers in nitric acid for 72 h. Electroplated-coated fibers show better tensile properties than cementation-coated fibers. Tin-lead alloy composites reinforced by nickel-coated fibers (which are pristine, anodically oxidized, and brominated) are fabricated by squeeze casting. The composites containing coated carbon fibers with bromination or surface treatment have higher tensile and shear strength than the ones containing coated pristine carbon fibers. In addition, the composite containing coated carbon fibers with brominalion shows the best performance in the tensile properties.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 7 , July 1995 , pp. 1730 - 1735
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Old, C. F., Barwood, I., and Nicholas, M. G., Pract. Met. Compos., Spring Meet., B47-B50, London, England, Inst. Metal. (1974).Google Scholar
2Ho, C. T. and Chung, D.D.L., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1266 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Miyase, A. and Piekarski, K., Adv. Res. Strength Fract. Mater., 4th Int. Conf. Fract., edited by Taplin, D. M. R. (Pergamon, Elmsford, NY, 1978), Vol. 3b, pp. 1067–1071.Google Scholar
4Gelderloos, D. G. and Karssek, K. R., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3, 232 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Leis, H. O. and Peters, P. W.M., Proc. ICCM-MIII, 1108 (1980).Google Scholar
6Pai, B. C. and Rohatgi, P. K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 161 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Fu, W. C., Fang, Y. M., and Feng, Y.D., Proc. ICCM-VI, 2183 (1987).Google Scholar
8Katzman, H. A., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 144 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kulkarni, A. G., Pai, B. C., and Balasubramanian, N., J. Mater. Sci. 14, 1572 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Zywicz, E. and Parks, D. M., Comp. Sci. Tech. 33, 295 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Ho, C. T., J. Mater. Res. 9, 2144 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Gaier, J. R., NASA Technical Memorandum 101394 (1988).Google Scholar
13Jaworske, D. A., Gaier, J. R., Hung, C. C., and Banks, B. A., SAMPLE Quarterly 18, 9 (1986).Google Scholar
14Chung, D. D. L., Li, P. T., and Li, X.M., Ext. Abstr. Program-Bienn.Conf. Carbon 18, 330 (1987).Google Scholar
15Fitzer, E., Carbon Fibers and Their Composites (Springer, Berlin, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Donnet, J. B. and Bansal, R. C., Carbon Fibers (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
17Donnet, J. B. and Bahl, O. P., in Encyclopedia of Physical Scienceand Technology (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1986).Google Scholar
18Kulkarni, A. G., Pai, B. C., and Balasubramanian, N., in Encylopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1979), Vol. 14, p. 592.Google Scholar
19Smith, S. F., Metal Finishing (Hackensack) 77(5), 60 (1979).Google Scholar
20In Plane Shear Strength of Reinforced Plastics, ASTM standard D3846-79 (ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1979).Google Scholar
21Abraham, S., Pai, B. C., Satynarayana, K. G., and Vaidyan, V. K., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 3479 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar