Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:03:10.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optical transmission of graphite and potassium graphite intercalation compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. M. Zhang  and
P. C. Eklund
J. M. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
P. C. Eklund
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Get access

Abstract

The results of an optical transmission study through ∼ 1000 Å thick flakes of graphite and the potassium graphite intercalation compounds KC8 and KC24 in the photon energy range of 1–5.5 eV are reported. Structure in the transmission spectra associated with the Drude minimum, the threshold for inter-π-band and the graphitic M-point absorption are observed. The transmission spectra are found to be consistent with the dielectric function ∊(ω) obtained from previous reflectance studies. The influence of the electronic absorption in the quasi-two-dimensional carbon π bands on the general form of the transmission spectra of graphite intercalation compounds is also shown.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , December 1987 , pp. 858 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Dresselhaus, M. S. and Dresselhaus, G., Adv. Phys. 30, 139 (1981).Google Scholar
2Solin, S. A., Adv. Chem. Phys. 49, 455 (1982).Google Scholar
3Hennig, G., J. Chem. Phys. 43, 1201 (1965).Google Scholar
4Eklund, P. C., Yang, M. H., and Doll, G. L. in Intercalation in Layered Materials, edited by Dresselhaus, M. S. (Plenum, New York, 1986), p. 257.Google Scholar
5Rigaux, C., in Ref. 4, p. 235.Google Scholar
6Blinowski, J., Hau, N. Hy, Rigaux, C., Vieren, J. P., Toullec, R., Furdin, G., Herold, A., and Melin, J., J. Phys. (Paris) 41, 47 (1980).Google Scholar
7Eklund, P. C., in Ref. 4, p. 163.Google Scholar
8Pankove, J. I., Optical Processes in Semiconductors (Dover, New York, 1971), p. 93.Google Scholar
9Houghton, J. T. and Smith, S. D., Infra-Red Physics (Oxford U.P., London, 1966), p. 243.Google Scholar
10To obtain Eq. (2) from Eq. (3), one must calculate the convolution integral T(λ') = ∫T (λ') S{λ –λ')dλ',where S(λ) is the instrument function that has a full width at half maximum (FWHM) ̃ resolution of the instrument.Google Scholar
11Taft, E. A. and Phillipp, H. R., Phys. Rev. 138, 197 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Johnson, L. G. and Dresselhaus, G., Phys. Rev. B 7, 2275 (1973).Google Scholar
13Fischer, J. E., Bloch, J. M., Shieh, C. C., Preil, M. E., and Jelly, K., Phys. Rev. B 31, 4773 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Wooten, F., Optical Properties of Solids (Academic, New York, 1972), p. 53.Google Scholar
15Donor-type GIC's have positively charged intercalate layers that have transferred electrons primarily to adjacent carbon layers.Google Scholar
16Bauhofer, W. and Jordan, H. J., J. Phys. E 15, 419 (1982).Google Scholar
17Hoffman, D. M., Eklund, P. C., Heinz, R. E., Hawrylak, P., and Subbaswamy, K. R., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3973 (1985).Google Scholar
18Zhang, J. M., Hoffman, D. M., and PEklund, . C., Phys. Rev. B 34, 4316 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Hoffman, D. M., Heinz, R. E., Doll, G. L., and Eklund, P. C., Phys. Rev. B 32, 1278 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Doll, G. L., Yang, M. H., and Eklund, P. C., Phys. Rev. B (to be published).Google Scholar
21For a donor-type GIC C1M (M might designate, for example, an alkali metal), charge transfer can also be expressed from the point of view of the intercalant (f M). For charge neutrality in the compound, we would have f M =lfc, or fc =fM/l, where fM = the number of electrons donated per M atom. For KC24, optical results have shown (Ref. 20) that fK (M = K) ≈ 1 electron per K atom.Google Scholar
22Shung, K.W.-K., Phys. Rec. B34, 1264 (1986).Google Scholar