Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:11:54.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phase selection during solidification of undercooled bulk Bi95Sb5 melts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Z. Zhou
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 603(34), Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China
J. Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 603(34), Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China
W. Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 603(34), Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China
Get access

Extract

Relationships between melt heat treatment and undercooling of alloy melts were clarified with Bi95Sb5 through four-factor, three-level orthogonal experiments. The results show that the cooling rate plays the most important role in the undercooling of Bi95Sb5 alloy melts. Undercooling as large as 121 K was obtained in the bulk Bi95Sb5 alloy melt. It is presently the highest undercooling of this alloy system. A metastable phase with tetragonal structure was found in the Bi95Sb5 alloy with undercooling of 121 K.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Thompson, C.V. and Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 31, 2021 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Feuerbacher, B., Mater. Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ostwald, W., Z. Phys. Chem. 22, 289 (1987).Google Scholar
4.Turnbull, D., J. Chem. Phys. 20, 411 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cech, R.E. and Turnbull, D., J. Met. 8, 124 (1956).Google Scholar
6.Hofmeister, W.H., Robinson, M.B., and Bayuzick, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 1342 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cortella, L., Vinet, B., Desre, P.J., Pasturel, A., Paxton, A.T., and Van Schilfgaarde, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1469 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kui, H.W., Greer, A.L., and Turnbull, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 615 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Herlach, D.M., Willnecker, R., and Gillessen, F., ESA SP 222, 399 (1984).Google Scholar
10.Duwez, P., Willens, R.H., and Klement, W., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1136 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Herlach, D.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. R12, 177 (1994), and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Tong, H.Y. and Shi, F.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 84 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Handbook of the Properties of Metals, edited by the Japan Metal Society, (Japan Metal Society, Tokyo, 1974), p. 22 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
14.Beveridge, G.S.G and Schechter, R.S., Optimization: Theory and Practice (McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1970), p. 84.Google Scholar
15.Handbook of Mathematics, edited by Wang, L., Fang, D., Zhang, M., and Lin, J. (People's Pub., Beijing, 1979), pp. 853860 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
16.Binary alloy phase diagrams, 2nd ed., edited by Massalski, T.B. (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1986), Vol. 1, Part II, p. 787.Google Scholar
17.High pressure phase transformations: A handbook, edited by Tonkov (Moskow), E. Yu., translated by Gorin, S., Nikolayev, B., Pozdeyer, P., Scheck, Yu. and Tonkov, E. (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia, 1992), p. 109Google Scholar