Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:08:08.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic and superaustenitic stainless steels in aqueous medium of NaCl and H2SO4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2016

Jorge Luiz Cardoso*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bloco 729, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil
Alfredo Leão Silva Nunes Cavalcante
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bloco 729, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil
Regina Coeli Araujo Vieira
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bloco 729, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil
Pedro de Lima-Neto
Affiliation:
Department of Analytical Chemistry and Physical Chemistry, Science Center, Federal University of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bloco 940, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil
Marcelo J. Gomes da Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Ceará, Campus do Pici, bloco 729, Fortaleza 60440-900, Ceará, Brazil
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jorgeluizjlc@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The pitting corrosion resistance of AL-6XN PLUS™ superaustenitic stainless steel, 304L, 316L, and 317L austenitic stainless steels was investigated using the cyclic polarization technique. These materials were evaluated in the as received condition and heat-treated at temperatures between 500 °C and 900 °C for 72 h. A thermodynamic simulation was performed using the software Thermocalc® to predict possible deleterious phases in selected temperatures. The simulations have predicted the sigma phase in the selected temperature range. An aqueous solution of sulfuric acid and sodium chloride was used as electrolyte in the corrosion tests. The results showed that pitting corrosion was not observed on the samples of AL-6XN PLUS™ steel. The 304L steel suffered pitting corrosion. All the polarization curves of this steel showed hysteresis characteristics of pitting corrosion. The 316L and 317L steels were resistant to pitting corrosion, but susceptible to crevice corrosion.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kim, M.T., Oh, M.O.Y., and Chang, S.Y.: Analysis of degradation of a super-austenitic stainless steel for flue gas desulfurization system after a fire accident. Eng. Failure Anal. 15, 575581 (2008).Google Scholar
Stephen Tait, P.W.: An Introduction to Electrochemical Corrosion Testing for Practicing Engineers and Scientists (PairODocs Publications, 1994).Google Scholar
Nunes, L.D.P.: Corrosion Resistance Fundamentals (ABRACO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007).Google Scholar
Padilha, A.F. and Rios, P.R.: Decomposition of austenitic stainless steels. ISIJ Int. 42, 325337 (2002).Google Scholar
Allegheny-Lundlum: AL-6XN PLUS™ Alloy Technical Data Blue Sheet (2002).Google Scholar
Anburaj, J., Nazirudeen, S.S.M., Narayanan, R., Anandavel, B., and Chandrasekar, A.: Ageing of forged superaustenitic stainless steel: Precipitate phases and mechanical properties. Mat. Sci. Eng., A 535, 99107 (2012).Google Scholar
Magnabosco, R.: Sigma phase formation kinetics between 700 and 900 °C in Superduplex stainless steel UNS S32750 (SAF 2507). Doctoral dissertation, FEI University Center, 2009.Google Scholar
ASTM G61-G86: Standard test Method for Conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements for Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Iron-, Nickel-, or Cobalt-Based Alloys. Reapproved (2009).Google Scholar
Villanueva, D.M.E., Junior, F.C.P., Plaut, R.L., and Padilha, A.F.: Comparative study on sigma phase precipitation of three types of stainless steels: Austenitic, superferritic and duplex. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, 10981104 (2006).Google Scholar
Wood, G.C.: The oxidation of iron-chromium alloys and stainless steels at high temperatures. Corros. Sci. 2, 173196 (1962).Google Scholar
Luce, W.A.: Stainless steels and other ferrous alloys. Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 22412254 (1953).Google Scholar
Singhal, L.K. and Martin, J.W.: The formation of ferrite and sigma-phase in some austenitic stainless steels. Acta Metall. 16, 14411451 (1968).Google Scholar
Bandy, R. and Cahoon, J.R.: Effect of composition on the electrochemical behaviour of austenitic stainless steel in Ringer's solution. Corrosion 33, 204208 (1977).Google Scholar
Ilevbare, G.O. and Burstein, G.T.: The role of alloyed molybdenum in the inhibition of pitting corrosion in stainless steels. Corros. Sci. 43, 485513 (2001).Google Scholar
Clayton, C.R. and Lu, Y.C.: An XPS study of the passive and transpassive behavior of molybdenum in deaerated 0.1 M HCl. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 2465 (1986).Google Scholar
Craig, B.D.: Fundamental Aspects of Corrosion Films in Corrosion Science (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2013).Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Kuron, D.: AES analysis of pits and passive films formed on Fe–Cr, Fe–Mo and Fe–Cr–Mo alloys. Corros. Sci. 31, 191 (1990).Google Scholar
Sugimoto, K. and Sawada, Y.: The role of molybdenum additions to austenitic stainless steel in the inhibition of pitting in acid chloride solution. Corros. Sci. 17, 425 (1997).Google Scholar
Li, H.B., Jiang, Z.H., Yang, Y., Cao, Y., and Zhang, Z.R.: Pitting corrosion and crevice corrosion behaviors of high nitrogen austenitic stainless steels. Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater. 16, 517 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedriks, A.J.: Corrosion of Stainless Steels, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 1996).Google Scholar