Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:05:00.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing of Bi2.1Sr1.8Ca1.1Cu2O8 source material for float-zone fiber growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P.N. Peszkin
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305–4045
R.J. Raymakers
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305–4045
R.S. Feigelson
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305–4045
L.V. Moulton
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305–2205
Z. Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305–2205
Get access

Abstract

Bi2.1Sr1.8Cu2O8 fibers having excellent superconducting properties can be grown by a laser-heated float zone process. In order to maintain stable growth conditions and thereby obtain fibers free of diameter fluctuations and voids, dense ceramic starting material containing only the 2212 phase is required. In this study various processing parameters, including calcining and sintering temperatures and times, grain size of the powders used, and pressing pressures were optimized to yield dense, chemically homogeneous starting material. It was found that under most conditions there was no increase in the density on sintering. Retrograde densification was the usual situation except at higher pressures and was found to depend on pressing pressure, calcination history, and sintering temperature. Cold-pressing at higher pressures (100000 psi) yielded denser but chemically inhomogeneous material. Ceramic samples sintered for long times (>48 h) yielded source rods that produced instabilities during fiber growth, presumably due to preferential loss of mass during sintering.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Feigelson, R. S., Gazit, D., Fork, D. K., and Geballe, T. H., Science 240, 16421645 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gazit, D. and Feigelson, R. S., J. Cryst. Growth 91, 318330 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ono, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28 (8), L1372–L1374 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Moulton, L. V., Brenner, J. M., Raymakers, R. J., Peszkin, P. N., and Feigelson, R. S., in High-Temperature Superconductors: Fundamental Properties and Novel Materials Processing, edited by Christen, D., Narayan, J., and Schneemeyer, L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 169, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 291.Google Scholar
5. See, for instance, Howard, P. J., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2, 22162219 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Johnson, D. W. Jr and Rhodes, W. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (12), 23462350 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Schultze, K., Majewski, P., Hettich, B., and Petzow, G., in Proc. ICMC 90 Topical Conf. on High Temp. Supercond., Garmisch-Partenkirchen, FRG (May 911, 1990).Google Scholar
8.Marie, M., Alsan, M., Jaeger, H., Majewski, P., and Schulze, K., in Proc. AUSTCERAM 90, Perth, Australia (Aug. 1990); to be published in Proc. Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung.Google Scholar