Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:15:05.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on the sensitivity of material parameters to cross-sectional deformation of thin-walled rectangular tube in rotary draw bending process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Jie Dong ,
Yuli Liu  and
He Yang
Jie Dong
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
Yuli Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
He Yang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lyl@nwpu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The fluctuation of material parameters and coupling effects of them have significant effects on cross-sectional deformation of rectangular tube in rotary draw bending process. So, in this research, a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) system was established based on the combination of Morris' GSA method and 3-D finite element method, and the reliability of the system is validated. Based on the system built, the sensitivity values of different material parameters combinations were analyzed. The results show that (i) the maximum cross-sectional deformation ratio decreases with the increase of Young's module E and strain hardening exponent n, while the effects of strength coefficient K, initial yield stress σS, and thickness anisotropy exponent γ on cross-sectional deformation are opposite to those of E and n, (ii) the groups which contain E and γ simultaneously show greater sensitivity and the effect of group only including E and γ on cross-sectional deformation is the most remarkable, while the most insensitive group in different combinations contains K, and (iii) mostly, the sensitivity values of coupling groups to cross-sectional deformation are larger than those of one-parameter groups.

Keywords

thin-walled rectangular tuberotary draw bendingMorris' global sensitivity analysiscoupling effects of material parameterscross-sectional deformation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 12 , 28 June 2016 , pp. 1784 - 1792
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hashmi, M.S.J.: Aspects of tube and pipe manufacturing processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 179(1–3), 9 (2006).Google Scholar
Li, H., Yang, H., Zhan, M., and Gu, R.J.: A new method to accurately obtain wrinkling limit diagram in NC bending process of thin-walled tube with large diameter under different loading paths. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 177, 192–196 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Yan, X.D., Wang, Z., Chen, S., and Li, H.: Experimental research on geometric accuracy of bending parts for aluminum rectangular in rotary-draw bending. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22(1), 88–93 (2014). (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Paulsen, F. and Welo, T.: Cross-sectional deformations of rectangular sections in bending: Part I—Experiments. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 120 (2001).Google Scholar
Clausen, A.H., Hopperstad, O.S., and Langseth, M.: Sensitivity of model parameters in stretch bending of aluminum extrusions. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 438–439 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.L., and Yang, H.: Influence of material parameters on rectangular tube cross section deformation in rotary-draw bending process. Hot Working Technology 38(13), 1–4, 7 (2009). (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Xu, C.G., Hu, Y.M., Chang, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, X.Z., Bu, R.C., and He, H.S.: Sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling. China J. Appl. Ecol. 15(6), 1057–1061 (2004). (In Chinese).Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, M.A., Burgman, M.A., and Ferson, S.: Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability. Biol. Conservat. 73, 95–98 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosetto, M. and Tarantola, S.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: Tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 15(5), 417–430 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarantola, S., Giglioli, N., Jesinghans, J., and Saltelli, A.: Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation for environmental assessments and decision-making? Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 16, 64–73 (2002).Google Scholar
Kala, Z.: Sensitivity analysis of stability problems of steel plan frames. Thin-Walled Struct. 49, 646–649 (2011).Google Scholar
Morris, M.D.: Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33(2), 161 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, X.M. and Tian, F.Q.: Sensitivity analysis of model parameters for confined aquifer specific vulnerability assessment in leakage area. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering 30(4), 53 (2011). (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Li, H.P., Liu, Y.L., Zhu, Y.X., and Yang, H.: Global sensitivity analysis and coupling effects of forming parameters on wall thinning and cross-sectional distortion of rotary draw bending of thin-walled rectangular tube with small bending radius. Int. J. Adv. Maunf. Technol. 74, 581 (2014).Google Scholar
Liu, K.X., Liu, Y.L., and Yang, H.: Experimental and FE simulation study on cross-section distortion in rotary draw bending process. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15(4), 636 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhen, D.C.: Metal Materials and Heat Treatment (Central South University Press, Changsha, China, 2010); p. 106. (In Chinese).Google Scholar