Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:25:31.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of zirconia addition in pore development and grain growth in alumina compacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Yi-Ming Pan
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78228
Richard A. Page
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78228
Gabrielle G. Long*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–8523
Susan Krueger
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–8523
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.
Get access

Abstract

The role of 12.4 vol% ZrO2 addition in the microstructure evolution of alumina compacts during the intermediate and final stages of sintering was investigated by means of small-angle neutron scattering measurements and stereological analysis. Both the pore-size evolution results and the grain-growth data indicate a narrowly defined onset density for the transition to the final sintering stage. The presence of ZrO2 as a second phase apparently maintains the stability of the intermediate sintering stage out to significantly higher density than in single-phase alumina and plays an important role in inhibiting grain growth and in preventing pore–grain boundary separation. The influence of the ZrO2 second phase on pore evolution, grain growth, and sinterability of the alumina–zirconia composite is discussed and compared to the behavior of single-phase alumina. The samples were prepared from commercially available powders, with naturally occurring porosity distributions, rather than from artifact(model) pore compacts prepared from nominally pure research-grade materials. The goal was to gain an improved understanding of microstructure development in real materials.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lange, F.F. and Hirlinger, M.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 164 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lange, F.F., Yamaguchi, T., Davis, B.I., and Morgan, P.E.D, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 446 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hsueh, C.H., Evans, A.G., and Coble, R.C., Acta. Metall. 30, 1269 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Spears, M.A. and Evans, A.G., Acta. Metall. 30, 1281 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zhao, J. and Harmer, M.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 530 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kingery, W.D. and Francois, B., in Sintering and Related Phenomena, edited by Kuczynski, G.C., Hooton, N.A., and Gibbon, G.F. (Gordon Breach, New York, 1967), pp. 471498.Google Scholar
7.Lange, F.F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 83 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Zheng, J. and Reed, J.S., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 71, 1410 (1992).Google Scholar
9.Zhao, J. and Harmer, M.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 830 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Krueger, S., Long, G.G., and Page, R.A., Acta Crystallogr. A47, 282 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Long, G.G., Krueger, S., and Page, R.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 1578 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Krueger, S., Long, G.G., Black, D.R., Minor, D., Jemian, P.R., Nieman, G.W., and Page, R.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74, 2538 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Glinka, C.J., Barker, J.G., Hammouda, B., Krueger, S., Moyer, J.J., and Orts, W.J., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 31, 430 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Berk, N.F. and Hardman-Rhyne, K.A., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 645 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Porod, G., Kolloid Z. 125, 51 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hardman-Rhyne, K.A. and Berk, N.F., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 18, 473 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Brook, R.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 56 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Brook, R.J., in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by Wang, F.F.Y (Academic Press, New York, 1976), Vol. 9, pp. 331364.Google Scholar
19.Kingery, W.D. and Francois, B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 48, 546 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hassold, G.N., Chen, I-W., and Srolovitz, D.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2857 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Chen, I-W., Hassold, G.N., and Srolovitz, D.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2865 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Kuczynski, G.C., Z. Metall. 67, 606 (1976).Google Scholar
23.Fang, T-T. and Palmour, H. III, Ceram. Int. 15, 329 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Fang, T-T. and Palmour, H. III, Ceram. Int. 16, 63 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Zhao, J. and Harmer, M.P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 113 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Majumdar, R., Gilbart, E., and Brook, R.J., Br. Ceram. Trans. J. 85, 156 (1986).Google Scholar
27.Fang, J., Thompson, A.M., Harmer, M.P., and Chan, H.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 2005 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Wakai, F., Iga, T., and Nagano, T., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 96, 1206 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.French, J.D., Zhao, J., Harmer, M.P., Chan, H.M., and Miller, G.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 2857 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar