Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T23:20:41.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy Investigation of the Strained Si1−xGex Band Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Xiangdong Chen
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Xiang-Dong Wang
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Kou-Chen Liu
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Dong-Won Kim
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Sanjay Banerjee
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712
Get access

Abstract

The band offsets and band gap are the most important parameters that determine the electrical and optical behavior of a heterojunction. In situ scanning tunneling spectroscopy was employed to measure the valence-band offset of strained Si1−xGex-on-Si (100) for the first time. The valence-band offsets of the strained Si0.77Ge0.23 and Si0.59Ge0.41 on Si(100) were found to be 0.21 and 0.36 eV, respectively. The results were in good agreement with theory and with results from other experimental methods. Due to band bending and surface states, it was difficult to determine the conduction band edge at the interface of the Si1−xGex/Si exactly but we found that the conduction band offset is much smaller than the valence-band offset.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Wang, K.L., Thomas, S.G., and Tanner, M.O., Journal of Materials: Materials in Electronics 6, 311 (1995).Google Scholar
2.Wang, K.L. and Karunasiri, R.P.G, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 1159 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Van de Walle, C.G. and Martin, R.M., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 34, 5621 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Brighten, J.C., Hawkins, I.D., Peaker, A.R., Parkerand, E.H.C, and Whall, T.E., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 1894 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kim, M. and Osten, H.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2702 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Khorram, S., Chern, C.H., and Wang, K.L., in Silicon Molecular Beam Epitaxy, edited by Bean, J.C., Iyer, S.S., and Wang, K.L. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 220, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991), p. 181.Google Scholar
7.Feenstra, R.M., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 50, 4561 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Feenstra, R.M., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 44, 13791 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Feenstra, R.M. and Stroscio, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol, B 5, 923 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Lang, D.V., People, R., Bean, J.C., and Sergent, A.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1333 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar