Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:05:33.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong and ductile platelet-reinforced polymer films inspired by nature: Microstructure and mechanical properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2011

Lorenz J. Bonderer ,
André R. Studart ,
Jörg Woltersdorf ,
Eckhard Pippel  and
Ludwig J. Gauckler
Lorenz J. Bonderer*
Affiliation:
Nonmetallic Materials, Department of Materials, ETH-Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
André R. Studart
Affiliation:
Complex Materials, Department of Materials, ETH-Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Eckhard Pippel
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institut für Mikrostrukturphysik, D-06120 Halle, Germany
Ludwig J. Gauckler*
Affiliation:
Nonmetallic Materials, Department of Materials, ETH-Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
*
a) e-mail: lorenz.bonderer@mat.ethz.ch
b) e-mail: ludwig.gauckler@mat.ethz.ch
Get access

Abstract

The unique structure and mechanical properties of platelet-reinforced biological materials such as bone and seashells have motivated the development of artificial composites exhibiting new, unusual mechanical behavior. On the basis of designing principles found in these biological structures, we combined high-performance artificial building blocks to fabricate platelet-reinforced polymer matrix composites that exhibit simultaneously high tensile strength and ductility. The mechanical properties are correlated with the underlying microstructure of the composites before and after mechanical loading using transmission electron microscopy. The critical role of the strength of the platelet–polymer interface and its dependence on the platelet surface chemistry and the type of matrix polymer are studied. Thin multilayered films with highly oriented platelets were produced through the bottom-up layer-by-layer assembly of submicrometer-thin alumina platelets and either polyimide or chitosan as polymer matrix. The tensile strength and strain at rupture of the prepared composites exceeded that of nacre, whereas the elastic modulus reached values similar to that of lamellar bones. In contrast to the brittle failure of clay-reinforced composites of similar or higher strength and stiffness, our composites exhibit plastic deformation in the range of 2–90% before failure. In addition to the high reinforcing efficiency and ductility achieved, several toughening mechanisms were identified in fractured composites, namely friction, debonding, and formation of microcracks at the platelet–polymer interface, as well as plastic deformation and void formation within the continuous polymeric phase. The combination of high strength, ductility, and toughness was achieved by selecting platelets that exhibit an aspect ratio high enough to carry significant load but small enough to allow for fracture under the platelet pull-out mode. At high concentrations of platelets, the ductility gets lost because of out-of-plane misalignment of the platelets and incorporation of voids in the microstructure during processing. The designing principles applied in this study can potentially be extended to other types of platelets and polymers to obtain new, hybrid materials with tunable mechanical properties.

Keywords

CompositeStrengthTransmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 2741 - 2754
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Lowenstam, H.A. and Weiner, S.: On Biomineralization (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989), pp. IX, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Sarikaya, M., Liu, J. and Aksay, I.A.: Nacre: Properties, crystal-lography, morphology, and formation, in Biomimetics Design and Processing of Materials, edited by Sarikaya, M. and Aksay, I.A. (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1995), pp. XI, 285.Google Scholar
3Mayer, G.: Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310, 1144 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Lin, A. and Meyers, M.A.: Growth and structure in abalone shell. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 390, 27 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Rousseau, M., Lopez, E., Stempfle, P., Brendle, M., Franke, L., Guette, A., Naslain, R. and Bourrat, X.: Multiscale structure of sheet nacre. Biomaterials 26, 6254 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Nassif, N., Pinna, N., Gehrke, N., Antonietti, M., Jager, C. and Colfen, H.: Amorphous layer around aragonite platelets in nacre. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 12653 (2005)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Currey, J.D.: Mechanical-properties of mother of pearl in Tension. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 196, 443 (1977)Google Scholar
8Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V. and Turner, R.M.: The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 234, 415 (1988)Google Scholar
9Wagner, H.D. and Weiner, S.: On the relationship between the microstructure of bone and its mechanical stiffness. J. Biomech. 25, 1311 (1992)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Jager, I. and Fratzl, P.: Mineralized collagen fibrils: A mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophys. J. 79, 1737 (2000)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Evans, A.G., Suo, Z., Wang, R.Z., Aksay, I.A., He, M.Y. and Hutchinson, J.W.: Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2475 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Gao, H.J., Ji, B.H., Jager, I.L., Arzt, E. and Fratzl, P.: Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5597 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Barthelat, F., Tang, H., Zavattieri, P.D., Li, C.M. and Espinosa, H.D.: On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: A key feature in the material hierarchical structure. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 306 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Padawer, G.E. and Beecher, N.: On strength and stiffness of planar reinforced plastic resins. Polym. Eng. Sci. 10, 185 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Lusis, J., Woodhams, R.T. and Xanthos, M.: Effect of flake aspect ratio on flexural properties of mica reinforced plastics. Polym. Eng. Sci. 13, 139 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Rexer, J. and Anderson, E.: Composites with planar reinforcements (flakes, ribbons)–Review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 19, 1 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Almqvist, N., Thomson, N.H., Smith, B.L., Stucky, G.D., Morse, D.E. and Hansma, P.K.: Methods for fabricating and characterizing a new generation of biomimetic materials. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 7, 37 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Ray, S.S. and Okamoto, M.: Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: A review from preparation to processing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1539 (2003)Google Scholar
19Deville, S., Saiz, E., Nalla, R.K. and Tomsia, A.P.: Freezing as a path to build complex composites. Science 311, 515 (2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Munch, E., Launey, M.E., Alsem, D.H., Saiz, E., Tomsia, A.P. and Ritchie, R.O.: Tough, bio-inspired hybrid materials. Science 322, 1516 (2008)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Kleinfeld, E.R. and Ferguson, G.S.: Stepwise formation of multilayered nanostructural films from macromolecular precursors. Science 265, 370 (1994)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Stankovich, S., Dikin, D.A., Dommett, G.H.B., Kohlhaas, K.M., Zimney, E.J., Stach, E.A., Piner, R.D., Nguyen, S.T. and Ruoff, R.S.: Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442, 282 (2006)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Messersmith, P.B. and Giannelis, E.P.: Synthesis and characterization of layered silicate-epoxy nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 6, 1719 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Schmidt, D., Shah, D. and Giannelis, E.P.: New advances in polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6, 205 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Sheng, N., Boyce, M.C., Parks, D.M., Rutledge, G.C., Abes, J.I. and Cohen, R.E.: Multiscale micromechanical modeling of polymer/clay nanocomposites and the effective clay particle. Polymer 45(2), 487 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Hull, D. and Clyne, T.W.: An Introduction to Composite Materials, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996), p. 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Okada, A. and Usuki, A.: The chemistry of polymer-clay hybrids. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 3, 109 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Podsiadlo, P., Kaushik, A.K., Arruda, E.M., Waas, A.M., Shim, B.S., Xu, J.D., Nandivada, H., Pumplin, B.G., Lahann, J., Ramamoorthy, A. and Kotov, N.A.: Ultrastrong and stiff layered polymer nanocomposites. Science 318, 80 (2007)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Bonderer, L.J., Studart, A.R. and Gauckler, L.J.: Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films. Science 319, 1069 (2008)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Glavinchevski, B. and Piggott, M.: Steel disk reinforced polycarbonate. J. Mater. Sci. 8, 1373 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Tang, Z.Y., Kotov, N.A., Magonov, S. and Ozturk, B.: Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nat. Mater. 2, 413 (2003)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Krohn, S.: Characterization and applications of short-chain chitosans. Ph.D. dissertation, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany, 2003.Google Scholar
33Bartlett, M.A. and Yan, M.D.: Fabrication of polymer thin films and arrays with spatial and topographical controls. Adv. Mater. 13, 1449 (2001)3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Macionczyk, F.: Determination of mechanical properties of thin Al and AlCu-layers on polyimide foils by tensile testing. Ph.D. dissertation, Shaker, Aachen, Germany, 1999, p. 131.Google Scholar
35Vaudin, M.D., Rupich, M.W., Jowett, M., Riley, G.N. and Bingert, J.F.: A method for crystallographic texture investigations using standard x-ray equipment. J. Mater. Res. 13, 2910 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Vaudin, M.D.: Software TexturePlus (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, 2006).Google Scholar
37Wang, R.Z., Suo, Z., Evans, A.G., Yao, N. and Aksay, I.A.: Deformation mechanisms in nacre. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2485 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Robinson, J.S., Cukrov, L.M., Tsuzuki, T., Lee, D.A., McCormick, P.G., Robinson, J., Heatley, L., Lee, D., McCormick, P. and Heatley, L.M.: Process for the production of ultrafine plate-like alumina particles. Patent No. WO/2004/060804 (July 22, 2004).Google Scholar
39Landis, W.J., Librizzi, J.J., Dunn, M.G. and Silver, F.H.: A study of the relationship between mineral-content and mechanical-properties of turkey gastrocnemius tendon. J. Bone Miner. Res. 10, 859 (1995)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Sano, H., Ciucchi, B., Matthews, W.G. and Pashley, D.H.: Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J. Dent. Res. 73, 1205 (1994)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed