Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:30:03.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of Deformation Behavior of Ultrafine-grained Materials Through in Situ Nanoindentation in a Transmission Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

M. Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
A.M. Minor
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
D. Ge
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
J.W. Morris Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jwmorris@berkeley.edu
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained and nanograined materials have received a great deal of recent attention because of their unusual and promising values. However, some of the most important mechanisms of deformation remain unclear. In this work, the deformation behavior of ultrafine-grained Al films and ultrafine-grained Fe is studied through in situ nanoindentation in a transmission electron microscope. Deformation-induced coarsening by grain boundary migration was observed in the ultrafine-grained Al films during deformation at room temperature, whereas no grain boundary motion was found in ultrafine-grained Fe. The lack of grain boundary motion in Fe was attributed to the pinning effect of nano-sized particles at the Fe grain boundaries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hall, E.O.: The deformation and aging of mild steel: Discussion and results. Proc. Phys. Soc. London B 64, 747 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Petch, N.J.: The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25 (1953).Google Scholar
3Morris, J.W. Jr.: The influence of grain size on the mechanical properties of steel, in Proceedings, International Symposium on Ultrafine Grained Steels, edited by Takaki, S. and Maki, T. (Iron and Steel Inst., Tokyo, Japan, 2001), p. 34.Google Scholar
4Gleiter, H.: Nanocrystalline materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 33, 223 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Erb, U.: Electrodeposited nanocrystals: Synthesis, properties and industrial applications. Nanostruct. Mater. 6, 533 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Koch, C.C.: Synthesis of nanostructured materials by mechanical milling: Problems and opportunities. Nanostruct. Mater. 9, 13 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Kimura, Y., Hidaka, H. and Takaki, S.: Work-hardening mechanism during super-heavy plastic deformation in mechanically milled iron powder. Mater. Trans. JIM 40, 1149 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Valiev, R.Z., Islamgaliev, R.K. and Alexandrov, I.C.: Bulk nanostructured materials from severe plastic deformation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 45, 103 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Zhou, F., Liao, X.Z., Zhu, Y.T., Dallek, S. and Lavernia, E.J.: Microstructural evolution during recovery and recrystallization of a nanocrystalline Al–Mg alloy prepared by cryogenic ball milling. Acta Mater. 51, 2777 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Hahn, H., Mondal, P. and Padmanabhan, K.A.: Plastic deformation of nanocrystalline materials. Nanostruct. Mater. 9, 603 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Schiotz, J., Vegge, T., Di Tolla, F.D. and Jacobsen, K.W.: Atomic-scale simulations of the mechanical deformation of nanocrystalline metals. Phys. Rev. B 60, 11971 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Van Swygenhoven, H. and Caro, A.: Plastic behavior of nanophase Ni: A molecular-dynamics computer simulation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1652 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Gutkin, M.Yu., Kolesnikova, A.L., Ovid’ko, I.A. and Skiba, N.V.: Disclinations and rotational deformation in fine-grained materials. Philos. Mag. Lett. 82, 651 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Gutkin, M.Yu., Ovid’ko, I.A. and Skiba, N.V.: Transformations of grain boundaries due to disclination motion and emission of dislocation pairs. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 339, 73 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ikuhara, Y., Suzuki, T. and Kubo, Y.: Transmission electron microscopy in situ observation of crack-propagation in sintered alumina. Philos. Mag. Lett. 66, 323 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Ii, S., Iwamoto, C., Matsunaga, K., Yamamoto, T. and Ikuhara, Y.: Identification of crack path of inter- and transgranular fractures in sintered silicon nitride by in situ TEM. J. Electron Microsc. 53, 121 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Stach, E.A., Freeman, T., Minor, A.M., Owen, D.K., Cumings, J., Wall, M.A., Chraska, T., Hull, R.Morris, J.W. Jr.Zettl, A. and Dahmen, U.: Development of a nanoindenter for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 7, 507 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Minor, A.M., Stach, E.A. and Morris, J.W. Jr.: Quantitative in situ nanoindentation in an electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1625 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Jin, M., Minor, A.M., Stach, E.A. and Morris, J.W. Jr.: Direct observation of deformation-induced grain growth during the nanoindentation of ultrafine-grained Al at room temperature. Acta Mater. 52, 5381 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Gottstein, G. and Shvindlerman, L.S.: Grain Boundary Migration in Metals(CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999), p. 150.Google Scholar