Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:36:16.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperature-dependent electrical properties of graphene nanoplatelets film dropped on flexible substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2014

Min Tian ,
Ying Huang Open the ORCID record for Ying Huang [Opens in a new window] ,
Weihua Wang ,
Ruiqi Li ,
Ping Liu ,
Caixia Liu  and
Yugang Zhang
Min Tian
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
Ying Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China; and Institute of Intelligence Machines, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, People's Republic of China
Weihua Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
Ruiqi Li
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
Ping Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
Caixia Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
Yugang Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: hf.hy@163.com
Get access

Abstract

The fabrication of a temperature sensor based on graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) is reported. A preheat process was carried out and the micrographs of both original and preheat-treated GNPs are observed and compared. Nonlinear temperature variation of resistance is observed and humidity interference is found to be negligible. Region of 10–60 °C (the linear region) is selected as the sensor range and further studied. High sensitivity of GNPs can be seen and the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) of 0.0371 is calculated, higher than that of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and many other materials reported in references. Great repeatability and small hysteresis are obtained. The time constant of the GNPs film is about 5 s, much shorter than that of MWCNTs film. The result suggests that GNPs have potential applications for use in highly sensitive and fast-response temperature sensors.

Keywords

temperature sensorgraphene nanoplateletsflexible substratethermal expansion
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 11 , 14 June 2014 , pp. 1288 - 1294
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Martínez, J.G., Otero, T.F., Bosch-Navarro, C., Coronado, E., Martí-Gastaldo, C., and Prima-Garcia, H.: Graphene electrochemical responses sense surroundings. Electrochimi. Acta 81, 49 (2012).Google Scholar
Yogeswaran, U. and Chen, S.M.: A review on the electrochemical sensors and biosensors composed of nanowires as sensing material. Sensors 8, 290–313 (2008).Google Scholar
Sun, P., Zhu, M., Wang, K., Zhong, M., Wei, J., Wu, D., and Zhu, H.: Small temperature coefficient of resistivity of graphene/graphene oxide hybrid membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 9563 (2013).Google Scholar
Schafft, H.A. and Suehle, J.S.: The measurement, use and interpretation of the temperature coefficient of resistance of metallizations. Solid-State Electron. 35, 403 (1992).Google Scholar
Kim, Y.T.: Achievement of zero temperature coefficient of resistance with RuOx thin film resistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 209 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Someya, T., Kato, Y., Sekitani, T., Iba, S., Noguchi, Y., Murase, Y., and Sakurai, T.: Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 102, 12321 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takei, K., Takahashi, T., Ho, J.C., Ko, H., Gillies, A.G., Leu, P.W., and Javey, A.: Nanowire active-matrix circuitry for low-voltage macroscale artificial skin. Nat. Mater. 9, 821 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, X.M., Zhao, H., Zha, J.W., and Dang, Z.M.: Positive piezoresistive behavior of electrically conductive alkyl-functionalized graphene/polydimethylsilicone nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem., C 1, 515 (2013).Google Scholar
Mattmann, C., Clemens, F., and Tröster, G.: Sensor for measuring strain in textile. Sensors 8, 3719 (2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, D.J., Mitra, D., Peterson, K., and Maharbiz, M.M.: A highly elastic, capacitive strain gauge based on percolating nanotube networks. Nano Lett. 12, 1821 (2012).Google Scholar
Kong, D., Le, L.T., Li, Y., Zunino, J.L., and Lee, W.: Temperature-dependent electrical properties of graphene inkjet-printed on flexible materials. Langmuir 28, 13467 (2012).Google Scholar
Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., and Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J.H., Jang, C., Xiao, S., Ishigami, M., and Fuhrer, M.S.: Intrinsic and extrinsic performance limits of graphene devices on SiO2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 206 (2008).Google Scholar
Watanabe, E.,Yamaguchi, S., Nakamura, J., and Natori, A.: Ballistic thermal conductance of electrons in graphene ribbons. Phys. Rev. B 80, 085404 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J.W., Wang, J.S., and Li, B.: Thermal conductance of graphene and dimerite. Phys. Rev. B 79, 205418 (2009).Google Scholar
Saito, K., Nakamura, J., and Natori, A.: Ballistic thermal conductance of a graphene sheet. Phys. Rev. B 76, 115409 (2007).Google Scholar
Balandin, A.A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrhan, D., Miao, F., and Lau, C.N.: Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 902 (2008).Google Scholar
Geim, A.K.: Graphene: Status and prospects. Science 324, 1530 (2009).Google Scholar
Choi, W., Lahiri, I., Seelaboyina, R., and Kang, Y.S.: Synthesis of graphene and its applications: A review. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 35, 52 (2010).Google Scholar
Wu, H. and Drzal, L.T.: Graphene nanoplatelet paper as a light-weight composite with excellent electrical and thermal conductivity and good gas barrier properties. Carbon 50, 1135 (2012).Google Scholar
Yan, P., Tang, Q., Deng, A., and Li, J.: Ultrasensitive detection of clenbuterol by quantum dots based electrochemiluminescent immunesensor using gold nanoparticles as substrate and electron transport accelerator. Sens. Actuators, B: Chemical 191, 508 (2014).Google Scholar
Mohiuddin, M. and Hoa, S.V.: Temperature dependent electrical conductivity of CNT–PEEK composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 21 (2011).Google Scholar
Neitzert, H.C., Vertuccio, L., and Sorrentino, A.: Epoxy/MWCNT composite as temperature sensor and electrical heating element. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 10, 688 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, L., Youkey, S., Bush, J., Jiao, J., Dubin, V.M., and Chebiam, R.V.: Effects of local Joule heating on the reduction of contact resistance between carbon nanotubes and metal electrodes. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 024320 (2007).Google Scholar
Woo, Y., Duesberg, G.S., and Roth, S.: Reduced contact resistance between an individual single-walled carbon nanotube and a metal electrode by a local point annealing. Nanotechnology 18, 095203 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W., Huang, Y., Wang, D., Liu, C., and Zhang, Y.: Piezoresistive behavior of graphene nanoplatelets/carbon black/silicone rubber nanocomposite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131, 39778 (2014).Google Scholar
Dewapriya, M.A.N., Phani, A.S., and Rajapakse, R.K.N.D.: Influence of temperature and free edges on the mechanical properties of graphene. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 065017 (2013).Google Scholar
Mousavi, H. and Bagheri, M.: Effects of Holstein phonons on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotubes. Phys. E 44, 1722 (2012).Google Scholar
Mitra, S., Singha, A., and Chakravorty, D.: Nonlinear temperature variation of resistivity in graphene/silicate glass nanocomposite. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 46, 375306 (2013).Google Scholar
Alamus, , Li, Y., Hu, N., Wu, L., Yuan, W., Chang, C., Liu, Y., Ning, H., Li, J., Surina, , Atobe, S., and Fukunaga, H.: Temperature-dependent piezoresistivity in an MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposite temperature sensor with ultrahigh performance. Nanotechnology 24, 455501 (2013).Google Scholar
Karimov, K.S., Chani, M.T.S., and Khalid, F.A.: Carbon nanotubes film based temperature sensors. Phys. E 43, 1701 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A.L., Chun, H., Heiman, D., Jung, Y.J., and Menon, L.: Investigation of electrical transport in hydrogenated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Physica B: Condens. Matter 406, 841 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Bergman, A.A., Gorokhovsky, A.A., and Zaitsev, A.M.: Formation of carbon nanofilms on diamond for all-carbon based temperature and chemical sensor application. Carbon 49, 1385 (2011).Google Scholar
Olsen, L.C.: Electrical transport properties of graphite assuming lattice scattering. Phys. Rev. B 6, 4836 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, K. and Hafez, M.: Growth and structure of carbon nanotubes based novel catalyst for ultrafast nano-temperature sensor application. Superlattices Microstruct. 54, (2012).Google Scholar
Qingyang, L., Yuanliang, Z., and Wei, X.: Dynamic compensation of Pt100 temperature sensor in petroleum products testing based on a third order model. In Intelligent Systems and Applications, 2009. ISA 2009. International Workshop on IEEE, 2009, p. 1.Google Scholar