Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T16:39:12.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the P-δ2 analysis to deconvolute the nanoindentation response of hard-coated systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. R. McGurk  and
T. F. Page
M. R. McGurk
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
T. F. Page*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: t.f.page@ncl.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The continuously recording indentation responses of a number of coated systems, mainly thin (<10 μm) hard nitride coatings on stainless steels and a powder metallurgy tool steel, have been explored using nanoindentation with indenter displacements increasing progressively to values greater than the coating thickness. The resultant load-displacement data have been analyzed not only to produce conventional load-displacement (P-δ) plots but also to examine the relationship between P and δ2. Recent models have proposed that there should be a linear P-δ2 relationship for homogeneous systems and that such plots have the potential to reveal the load/displacement regimes in which either the coating or the substrate, or both, are dominant in controlling the overall behavior of the coated system. By utilizing point-to-point differentiation of the P-δ2 relationship, this paper extends this approach to confirm not only that these different regimes of behavior may be readily experimentally identified in this way, but also that further details, such as the propagation of cracks, may be recognized. Our analysis also provides a valuable experimental link to models describing the near-surface deformation behavior of coated systems.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 2283 - 2295
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Hainsworth, S. V., Chandler, H. W., and Page, T. F., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1987–1995 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G. M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hainsworth, S. V., Sj, H.öström, Page, T. F., and Sundgren, J. E., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W.W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J-E., and Baker, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp. 275–280.Google Scholar
4.Bull, S.J. (University of Newcastle), private communication (1998).Google Scholar
5.Hainsworth, S.V. and Page, T. F., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W.W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J-E., and Baker, S. P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
6.Bull, S.J. and Korsunsky, A. M., Tribol. Int. 31, 547–551 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McGurk, M.R., Chandler, H. W., Twigg, P. C., and Page, T. F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69, 576–581 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McGurk, M.R. and Page, T. F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 92, 87–95 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Korsunsky, A.M., McGurk, M. R., Bull, S. J., and Page, T. F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 99, 171–183 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ramsey, P.M., Chandler, H.W., and Page, T. F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 49, 504–509 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.McGurk, M. R., An Exploration of The Contact Response of Ceramic-Coated Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (1997).Google Scholar
12.Page, T.F. and Hainsworth, S. V., Surf. Coat. Technol. 61, 201–208 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hainsworth, S. V., McGurk, M. R., and Page, T.F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 102, 97–107 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Bückle, H., in The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications, edited by Westbrook, J. H. and Conrad, H. (ASTM, 1971), pp. 453–494.Google Scholar
15.Lucas, B. N., Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M., and Loubet, J-L., in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W. W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J-E., and Baker, S.P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp. 233–238.Google Scholar
16.Page, T. F., Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M., Herbert, E., Lucas, B. N., Hay, J. C., and Riester, L., in Fundamentals of Nanoindentation and Nanotribology, edited by Baker, S. P., Burnham, N., Gerberich, W.W., and Moody, N. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, Warrendale, PA, 1998), pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
17.Joslin, D. L. and Oliver, W. C., J. Mater. Res. 5, 123–126 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Greenwood, J. A. and Williamson, J. B. P., Proc. Roy. Soc. London A295, 300–330 (1966).Google Scholar