Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:50:44.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Void nucleation in metal interconnects: Combined effects of interface flaws and crystallographic slip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y-L. Shen
Y-L. Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Get access

Abstract

A micromechanical model of void nucleation in passivated metal interconnection lines is proposed. The model is based on the evolution of stress and strain fields in a two-dimensional model system, obtained from numerical modeling. Interface flaws in the form of debond between the metal and the surrounding dielectric are assumed to exist. A unique pattern of shear stress resolved on the slip systems in the metal line, due to the presence of pre-existing debond, is found. A dislocation slip model is constructed in accordance with the shear mode. The mechanism of crystallographic slip is such that lateral thinning of the metal line at the debond region together with the slip step produced at the edges of debond lead to a net transport of atoms away from the debond area, and a physical void is thus formed. The significance and implications of this proposed micromechanism are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , February 1999 , pp. 584 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Okabayashi, H., Mater. Sci. Eng. R11, 191 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sullivan, T.D., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26, 333 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gleixner, R. J., Clemens, B. M., and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 12, 2081 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Flinn, P. A., MRS Bull. 20 (11), 70 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Marieb, T., Flinn, P., Bravman, J. C., Gardner, D., and Madden, M., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 1026 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wada, T., Sugimoto, M., and Ajiki, T., IEEE Trans. Reliability 38, 565 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Abe, H., Tanabe, S., Kondo, Y., and Ikubo, M., in Extended Abstract (Japan Society of Applied Physics 39th Spring Meeting, 1992), p. 658.Google Scholar
8. ABAQUS, Version 5.6, Hibbit, Karlson, and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, Rhode Island (1997).Google Scholar
9.Shen, Y-L., J. Appl. Phys. 84 (Nov. 1998) (in press).Google Scholar
10.Volkert, C.A., Alofs, C. F., and Liefting, J. R., J. Mater. Res. 9, 1147 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Thouless, M. D., Rodbell, K. P., and Cabral, C. Jr, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2454 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Shen, Y-L. and Suresh, S., in Polycrystalline Thin Films–Structure, Texture, Properties, and Applications II, edited by Frost, H. J., Parker, M. A., Ross, C.A., and Holm, E.A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 403, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996), p. 133.Google Scholar
13.Jawarani, D., Kawasaki, H., Yeo, I-S., Rabenberg, L., Stark, J. P., and Ho, P. S., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1563 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tanikawa, A. and Okabayashi, H., in Proc. 28th Int. Reliability Phys. Symp. (IEEE, New York, 1990), p. 209.Google Scholar
15.Oates, A. S., in Proc. 31st Int. Reliability Phys. Symp. (IEEE, New York, 1993), p. 297.Google Scholar
16.Kaneko, H., Hasunuma, M., Sawabe, A., Kawanoue, T., Kohanawa, Y., Komatsu, S., and Miyauchi, M., in Proc. 28th Int. Reliability Phys. Symp. (IEEE, New York, 1990), p. 194.Google Scholar
17.Takaoka, A. and Ura, K., Ultramicroscopy 39, 299 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rose, J. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 2170 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rose, J. H. and Spooner, T., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics III, edited by Rodbell, K. P., Filter, W. F., Frost, H. J., and Ho, P. S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 409.Google Scholar
20.Joo, Y-C. and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6062 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar