Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:24:18.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wetting between prospective crucible materials and the Ba-Cu-O melt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Ch. Krauns
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
M. Tagami
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Y. Yamada
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
M. Nakamura
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Y. Shiohara
Affiliation:
Superconductivity Research Laboratory, ISTEC, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The reaction between the Ba-Cu-O melt (with a Ba to Cu ratio of 3-5 or 3-7) used for crystal pulling of Y-123 and several prospective crucible materials (MgO, Y2O3, Al2O3, and YSZ) has been investigated by dipping these materials into the melt at 985 °C and 1050 °C in air. For comparison, MgO, YSZ, LaAlO3, and SrTiO3 single crystals were also investigated. In the case of MgO single crystals, no wetting or reactive layer has been observed, although with increasing time an increasing amount of MgO has been dissolved into the melt. The contact angle between melt and MgO single crystal can be estimated to be about 40°, assuming a surface tension of 0.3 N/m. For all other materials, increasing time was accompanied by increasing wetting and/or an increasing reaction layer. For MgO polycrystals increased wetting with increasing time has been observed. For example, it takes about 30 min to wet the first 10 mm. The melt completely permeates samples with an apparent density of up to 85%. However, the permeated depth becomes very thin in samples with an apparent 95% density. It was found that Y2O3 is a better barrier to the melt at lower densities because even at 85% density the permeated layer is very thin, but the surface wetting occurs at a slightly faster rate for Y2O3 than for MgO.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Jiang, X. P., Cima, M. J., Brody, H. D., Haggerty, J. S., and Flemings, M. C., Int. Workshop on Superconductivity, Hawaii (1992).Google Scholar
2Yamada, Y., Nakagawa, M., Ishige, K., and Shiohara, Y., Advances in Superconductivity IV (ISS '91), p. 305; Yamada, Y. and Shiohara, Y., Physica C 217, 182188 (1993).Google Scholar
3Pellerin, N., Jouan, G., and Odier, P., J. Mater. Res. 8, 18 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kaiser, D. L., Holtzberg, F., Scott, B. A., and McGuire, T. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1040 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Levich, V. G., Physicochemical Hydrodynamics (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962).Google Scholar
6Gutfmger, C. and Tallmadge, J. A., AIChE J. 10, 774 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar