Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:26:55.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Young's modulus measurements on ultra-thin coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

T. Chudoba
Affiliation:
Advanced Surface Mechanics (ASMEC), D-01454 Rossendorf, Germany, and Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany
M. Griepentrog
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), D-12200 Berlin, Germany
A. Dück
Affiliation:
Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), D-12200 Berlin, Germany
D. Schneider
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Materials and Beam Technique, D-01277 Dresden, Germany
F. Richter
Affiliation:
Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics, D-09107 Chemnitz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The determination of the mechanical properties of ultra-thin coatings has become more and more important because of the increasing number of applications using such films. However, an accurate mechanical testing of coatings with a thickness down to some nanometers is still a challenge, despite the improvements of existing measurement techniques. Nanoindentation is an often used mechanical nanoprobe. Using the conventional test method with a sharp Berkovich indenter, the problem of the influence of the substrate on the results arises with decreasing film thickness. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to measure the modulus of films with a thickness less than 100–200 nm. The problem can be overcome by using spherical indenters in combination with an analytical solution for the Hertzian contact of coated systems. It allows a separation of film and substrate properties from the load–displacement curve of the compound. Indentation measurements were done at a 44 nm TiN film and at diamondlike carbon coatings in the thickness range between 4.3 nm and 125 nm on Si substrates. Several corrections were applied to obtain wholly elastic force–displacement curves with high accuracy. It is shown in more detail how zero point and thermal drift corrections are used to obtain statistical depth errors below 0.2 nm. Laser-acoustic measurements based on ultrasonic surface waves were chosen as a second method, which also measures the Young’s modulus in this thickness range. Although the indentation technique is a local probe and the laser-acoustic technique gives an integrated value for a surface range of some millimeters, the results agree well for the investigated samples. In contrast, it was impossible to get the correct Young’s modulus results by conventional indentation measurements with Berkovich indenter, even for ultra-low loads.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Schneider, D., Schwarz, T. and Schultrich, B., Thin Solid Films 219 82 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Schneider, D. andTh., Schwarz, Surf. Coat. Technol. 91 136 (1997).Google Scholar
3.King, R.B., Int. J. Solids Struct. 23 1657 (1987).Google Scholar
4.Bhattacharya, A.K. and Nix, W.D., Int. J. Solids Struct. 24 1287 (1988).Google Scholar
5.Gao, H., Chiu, C-H. and Lee, J., Int. J. Solids Struct. 29 2471 (1992).Google Scholar
6.Menčik, J., Munz, D., Quandt, E. and Weppelmann, E.R., J. Mater. Res. 12 2475 (1997).Google Scholar
7.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., Richter, F. and Beck, U., Thin Solid Films 377–378 366 (2000).Google Scholar
8.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. ISO 14577, Metallic Materials–Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2002).Google Scholar
10.Hill, R., Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65 349 (1952).Google Scholar
11.Schülke, Th.Anders, A. and Siemroth, P.IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 25, 660 (1997).Google Scholar
12.Schneider, D., Witke, Th.Schwarz, Th.Schöneich, B. and Schultrich, B., Surf. Coat. Technol. 126 136 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. European Project: Determination of Hardness and Modulus of Thin Films and Coatings by Nanoindentation (INDICOAT), Contract No. SMT4-CT98-2249, NPL Report MATC(A) 24, May 2001.Google Scholar
14.Chudoba, T. and Herrmann, K., Härtereitechnische Mitteilungen, HTM 56 258 (2001).Google Scholar
15.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N. and Richter, F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 127 9 (2000).Google Scholar
16.Farnell, G.W. and Adler, E.L. in Physical Acoustics, edited by Mason, W.P. and Thurston, R.N. (Academic Press, New York, 1972), Vol. IX, p. 35.Google Scholar
17.Coufal, H., Grygier, R., Hess, P. and Neubrand, A., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92 2980 (1992).Google Scholar
18.Schneider, D., Siemroth, P., Schülke, T., Berthold, J., Schultrich, B., Schneider, H.H., Ohr, R., Petereit, B. and Hilgers, H., Surf. Coat. Technol. 153 252 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Schwarzer, N., Richter, F. and Hecht, G., Surf. Coat. Technol. 114 292 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Schwarzer, N., J. Tribol. 122 672 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Fabrikant, V.I.Application of Potential Theory in Mechanics: A Selection of New Results (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989).Google Scholar
22.Fabrikant, V.I.Mixed Boundary Value Problems of Potential Theory and Their Applications in Engineering (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991).Google Scholar
23.Chudoba, T. and Schwarzer, N. ELASTICA software demonstration package, available at http://www.asmec.de/.Google Scholar
24.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N. and Richter, F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 154 140 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Herrmann, K., Jennett, N.M., Saunders, S.R.J., Meneve, J. and Pohlenz, F., Z. Metallkd. 93 9 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Schneider, D., Schwarz, T., Scheibe, H.J. and Panzner, M., Thin Solid Films 295 107 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Jiang, X., Wang, M. and Schmidt, K., J. Appl. Phys. 69 3053 (1991).Google Scholar