Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:58:43.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accurate Integration of Nonlinear Systems Using Newmark Explicit Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

S.-Y. Chang
S.-Y. Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608, R.O.C.
*
* Professor
Get access

Abstract

In the step-by-step solution of a linear elastic system, an appropriate time step can be selected based on analytical evaluation resultsHowever, there is no way to select an appropriate time step for accurate integration of a nonlinear system. In this study, numerical properties of the Newmark explicit method are analytically evaluated after introducing the instantaneous degree of nonlinearity. It is found that the upper stability limit is equal to 2 only for a linear elastic system. In general, it reduces for instantaneous stiffness hardening and it is enlarged for instantaneous stiffness softening. Furthermore, the absolute relative period error increases with the increase of instantaneous degree of nonlinearity for a given product of the natural frequency and the time step. The rough guidelines for accurate integration of a nonlinear system are also proposed in this paper based on the analytical evaluation results. Analytical evaluation results and the feasibility of the rough guidelines proposed for accurate integration of a nonlinear system are confirmed with numerical examples.

Keywords

Instantaneous degree of nonlinearityStabilityAccuracy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bathe, K. J., Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1996).Google Scholar
2.Belytschko, T. and Schoeberle, D. F., “On the Unconditional Stability of an Implicit Algorithm for Nonlinear Structural Dynamics,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 17, pp. 865–869 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Belytschko, T. and Hughes, T. J. R., Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland (1983).Google Scholar
4.Chang, S. Y., “A Series of Energy Conserving Algorithms for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 19, pp. 219–230 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chang, S. Y., “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Explicit Methods in Pseudodynamic Tests,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, pp. 917–929 (1997).3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chang, S. Y., “The γFunction Pseudodynamic Algorithm,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4, pp. 303–320 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Chang, S. Y., “Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 128, pp. 935–947 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Chang, S. Y., “Nonlinear Error Propagation Analysis for Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 129, pp. 841–850 (2003).Google Scholar
9.Chang, S. Y., “Error Propagation in Implicit Pseudodynamic Testing of Nonlinear Systems,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 131, pp. 1257–1269 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Chang, S. Y., “Accurate Representation of External Force in Time History Analysis,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 132, pp. 34–45 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Chang, S. Y., “Enhanced, Unconditionally Stable Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 133, pp. 541–554 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chang, S. Y., “Improved Explicit Method for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 133, pp. 748–760 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Chang, S. Y., Huang, Y. C. and Wang, C. H., “Analysis of Newmark Explicit Integration Method for Nonlinear Systems,” Journal of Mechanics, 22, pp. 321–329 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Clough, R. W. and Penzien, J., Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, Inc, International Editions (1993).Google Scholar
15.Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R. and Taylor, R. L., “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5, pp. 283–292 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hughes, T. J. R., “Stability, Convergence and Growth and Decay of Energy of the Average Acceleration Method in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics,” Computer and Structures, 6, pp. 313–324 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hughes, T. J. R., The Finite Element Method, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1987).Google Scholar
18.Newmark, N. M., “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 85, pp. 67–94 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Wilson, E. L., Farhoomand, I. and Bathe, K. J., “Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Complex Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1, pp. 241–252 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Wood, W. L., Bossak, M. and Zienkiewicz, O. C., “An Alpha Modification of Newmark's Method,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 15, pp. 1562–1566 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Zienkiewicz, O. C., The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill Book Co (UK) Ltd. Third Edition (1977).Google Scholar