Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:53:35.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correction of Local Collection Efficiency Based on Roughness Element Concept for Glaze Ice Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

Taekeun Yoon Open the ORCID record for Taekeun Yoon [Opens in a new window]  and
Kwanjung Yee
Taekeun Yoon
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Seoul National UniversitySeoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Kwanjung Yee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Seoul National UniversitySeoul 08826, Republic of Korea
*
*Corresponding author (kjyee@snu.ac.kr)
Get access

Abstract

In glaze ice conditions, beads on the surface usually grow to form roughness elements through coalescence, finally resulting in enhancement of local collection efficiency. However, the effects of roughness elements due to freezing of beads are not reflected on the local collection efficiency in CFD icing simulations. This is problematic for predicting the resultant ice shape, which may lead to inaccurate aerodynamic performance and load distribution. The aim of this study is to propose a macroscopic icing model which can reflect bead microscopic phenomena using the Eulerian approach. To this end, a correction was made for collection efficiency by introducing a novel parameter - the effective impinging angle- which is the angle to calculate the local collection efficiency depending on the physical state of surface. It is assumed that the parameter related to the contact angle represents the state of beads. The computational icing analysis of airfoil was performed using the proposed model both in the rime condition and glaze conditions. The results show that the icing characteristics in the feather region is captured with enhanced accuracy in both conditions.

Keywords

Ice accretionEulerian approachLocal collection efficiencyFeather region
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 607 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Makkonen, L., Laakso, T., Marjaniemi, M., and Finstad, K. J., “Modelling and Prevention of Ice Accretion on Wind Turbines,” Wind Engineering, 25 (1), pp.3-21 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poots, G., Ice and Snow Accretion on Structures, Vol. 10. Research Studies PressLtd (1996).Google Scholar
Gent, R. W., Dart, N. P. and Cansdale, J. T., “Aircraft Icing,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 358 (2000).Google Scholar
Broeren, A. P., Bragg, M. B., Addy, H. E., Lee, S., Moens, F. and Guffond, D., “Effect of High-fidelity Ice-accretion Simulations on Full-scale Airfoil Performance,” Journal of aircraft, 47(1), pp.240-254 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y., and Palacios, J., “Analytical and Experimental Determination of Airfoil Performance Degradation Due to Ice Accretion,” 4th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, Louisiana, U.S.A. (June 25-28, 2012).Google Scholar
Olsen, W., and Walker, E., “Experimental Evidence for Modifying the Current Physical Model for Ice Accretion on Aircraft Surfaces,” NASA TM 87184 (1986).Google Scholar
Shin, J., “Characteristics of Surface Roughness Associated with Leading-Edge Ice Accretion,” Journal of Aircraft, 33(2), pp.316-321 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedde, T., and Guffond, D., “Improvement of the ONERA 3D Icing Code, Comparison with 3D Experimental Shapes,” AIAA 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 11-14, 1993).Google Scholar
Anderson, D.N., and Shin, J., “Characterization of Ice Roughness from Simulated Icing Encounters,” AIAA 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 06-09, 1997).Google Scholar
Vargas, M., Tsao, J., and Rothmayer, A., “Review of Role of Icing Feathers in Ice Accretion Formation,” SAE-2007-01-3294, pp.589-601 (2007).Google Scholar
Shin, J., and Bond, T., “Experimental and Computational Ice Shapes and Resulting Drag Increase for a NACA 0012 Airfoil,” NASA TM 105743 (1992).Google Scholar
Croce, G., Candido, E. D., Habashi, W. G., and Munzar, J., “FENSAP-ICE: Analytical Model for Spatial and Temporal Evolution of In-flight Icing Roughness,” Journal of Aircraft, 47(4), pp. 1283-1289 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozcer, I. A., Baruzzi, G. S., Reid, T., Habashi, W. G., Fossati, M., and Croce, G., “FENSAP-ICE: Numerical Prediction of Ice Roughness Evolution and Its Effect on Ice Shapes,” International Conference on Aircraft and Engine Icing and Ground Deicing, Chicago, U.S.A. (2011).Google Scholar
Tsuboi, K., and Kimura, S., “Application of Eulerian Approach to Simulate Hard Rime Accretion,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 26(4-5), pp.505-521 (2012).Google Scholar
Hansman, R. J., Reehorst, A., and Sims, J., “Analysis of Surface Roughness Generation in Aircraft Ice Accretion,” AIAA 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 06-09, 1992).Google Scholar
Hansman, R. J., Breuer, K., Hazan, D., Reehorst, A., and Vargas, M., “Close-up Analysis of Aircraft Ice Accretion,” AIAA 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 11-14, 1993).Google Scholar
McClain, S., Vargas, M., and Taso, J., “Characterization of Ice Roughness Variations in Scaled Glaze Icing Conditions,” 8th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. (June 13-17, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasquez, M., and Hansman, R. J., “Implementation of Combined Feather and Surface-normal Ice Growth Models in LEWICE/X,” AIAA 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 09-12, 1995).Google Scholar
Wright, W. B., and Rutkowski, A., “Validation Results for LEWICE 2.0,” NASA CR-1999-208690 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, J., and Anderson, D., “Latest Development in SLD Scaling,” 4th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Meeting, Ontario, Canada (June 06-09, 2005).Google Scholar
Bragg, M. B., Broeren, A. P., and Blumenthal, L. A., “Iced-airfoil Aerodynamics,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41(5), pp.323-362 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansman, R. J., and Turnock, S. R., “Investigation of Surface Water Behavior during Glaze Ice Accretion,” Journal of Aircraft, 26(2), pp.140-147 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothmayer, A., and Tsao, J., “On the Incipient Motion of Air Driven Water Beads,” AIAA 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Nevada, U.S.A. (January 08-11, 2001).Google Scholar
OpenFOAM, “Open-source Field Operation and Manipulation,” Software Package, Ver. 2.2.0, (2011), http://www.openfoam.com.Google Scholar
Bourgault, Y., Beaugendre, H., and Habashi, W. G., “Development of a Shallow-water Icing Model in FENSAP-ICE,” Journal of Aircraft, 37(4), pp.640-646 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, C., Oh, S. and Yee, K., “Ice Accretion on Helicopter Fuselage Considering Rotor-Wake Effects,” Journal of Aircraft, 54(2), pp.500-518 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaugendre, H., “A PDE-Based 3D Approach to Inflight Ice Accretion,” Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Quebec, Canada (2003).Google Scholar