Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:02:59.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry Applied to the Displacement Measurement of Sandwich Plates with Single ‘Fully Potted’ Insert

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

S. J. Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan 621, R.O.C.
H. L. Lin*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan 621, R.O.C.
*
* Assistant Professor
** Master
Get access

Abstract

The construction and operation of electronic speckle pattern interferometer (ESPI) applied to single-inserted sandwich plates have been earliest presented in this paper. Proposed ESPI has advantages of full-field and non-destructive testing, which can measures microscopic out-of-plane displacement in the elastic region without wasting specimen. For validation purpose, the finite element method (FEM) analysis was conducted. By comparing the results of ESPI and FEM displacement fields around the inserts that a convincing agreement is revealed. The effect of potting material diameter on the displacement of single-inserted sandwich plates was obtained by the ESPI and FEM.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Thomsen, O. T., “Sandwich Plates with ‘Through-the-Thickness’ and ‘Fully Potted’ Inserts: Evaluation of Differences in Structural Performance,” J. Compo. Struct., 40, pp. 159174 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Thomsen, O. T. and Rits, W., “Analysis and Design of Sandwich Plates with Insert-A High-Order Sandwich Plate Theory Approach,” J. Compo. Part B, 29B, pp. 795807 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Noirot, F., Ferrero, J. F., Barrau, J. J., Castanie, B. and Sudre, M., “Analyse D'inserts Pour Les Structures Sandwich Composites,” J. Mech. Ind., 1, pp. 241249 (2000).Google Scholar
4.Found, M. S., Robinson, A. M. and Carruthers, J. J., “The Influence of FRP Inserts on the Energy Absorption of a Foam-Cored Sandwich Panel,” J. Compo. Struct., 38, pp. 373381 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mamalis, A. G., Manolakos, D. E., Ioannidis, M. B., Papapostolou, D. P., Kostazos, P. K. and Konstantinidis, D. G., “On the Compression of Hybrid Sandwich Composite Panels Reinforced with Internal Tube Inserts: Experimental,” J. Compo. Struct., 56, pp. 191199 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Butters, J. N. and Leendertz, J. A., “Holographic and Video Techniques Applied to Engineering Measurements,” J. Meas. Control, 4, p. 349 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Macovski, A., Ramsy, D. and Schaefer, L. F., “Time-Laps-Interferometry and Contouring using Television Systems,” J. Appl. Optics, 10, pp. 27222727 (1971).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Sirohi, R. S., Speckle Metrology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1993).Google Scholar
9.Thomsen, O. T., Rits, W., Eaton, D. C. G., Dupont, O. and Queekers, P., “Ply Drop-Off Effects in CFRP/Honeycomb Sandwich Panels-Experimental Results,” J. Compo. Science and Technology, 56, pp. 423437 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar