Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:24:00.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Out-of-Plane Compressive Response of Additively Manufactured Cross-Ply Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2020

R. N. Yogeshvaran
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, LeicesterLE1 9BH, UK
B. G. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, CambridgeCB2 1PZ, UK
F. Farukh
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, LeicesterLE1 9BH, UK
K. Kandan*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, LeicesterLE1 9BH, UK
*
*Corresponding author (karthikeyan.kandan@dmu.ac.uk)
Get access

Abstract

Digital manufacturing was employed to 3D print continuous Carbon, Glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced composites in Unidirectional (UD) [0°], Off-axis ±45° and Cross-ply [0°/90°] layup sequence. These 3D printed composites were subjected to quasi-static, in-plane tension and out-of-plane (compression and shear) loading. The tensile strength of 3D printed Carbon, Glass and Kevlar UD laminates was significantly lower than that of 3D printing filaments used to manufacture them. The type of fibre (brittle/ductile) reinforcement was found to be governing the shear yield strength of 3D printed composites despite having the same Nylon matrix in all the composites. Out-of-plane compressive strength of the 3D printed Carbon and Glass fibre reinforced composites was independent of specimen size. Contrary to that, Kevlar fibre composites showed a pronounced size effect upon their out-of-plane compressive strength. A combination of X-ray tomography and pressure film measurements revealed that the fibres in 3D printed composites failed by ‘indirect tension’ mechanism which governed their out-of-plane compressive strength. To gain further insights on the experimental observations, Finite Element (FE) simulations were carried out using a pressure-dependent crystal plasticity framework, in conjunction with an analytical model based on shear-lag approach. Both FE and analytical model accurately predicted the out-of-plane compressive strength of all (Carbon, Glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced) 3D printed composites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Attwood, J. P., Russell, B. P., Wadley, H. N. G., and Deshpande, V. S.. “Mechanisms of the penetration of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composite beams.International Journal of Impact Engineering, 93, pp. 153165 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karthikeyan, K., and Russell, B. P.. “Polyethylene ballistic laminates: Failure mechanics and interface effect.Materials & Design, 63, pp. 115125 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karthikeyan, K., Russell, B. P., Fleck, N. A., Wadley, H. N. G., and Deshpande, V. S.. “The effect of shear strength on the ballistic response of laminated composite plates.European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 42, pp. 3553 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Masta, M. R., Crayton, D. H., Deshpande, V. S., and Wadley, H. N. G.. “Mechanisms of penetration in polyethylene reinforced cross-ply laminates.International Journal of Impact Engineering, 86, pp. 249264 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallah, A. S., Micallef, K., Langdon, G. S., Lee, W. C., Curtis, P. T., and Louca, L. A.. “Dynamic response of Dyneema® HB26 plates to localised blast loading.International Journal of Impact Engineering, 73, pp. 91100 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jun, Wu, Chengqing, and Liu, Zhong-Xian. “Comparative evaluation of steel wire mesh, steel fibre and high performance polyethylene fibre reinforced concrete slabs in blast tests.Thin-Walled Structures, 126, pp. 117126 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, J. P., Khaderi, S. N., Karthikeyan, K., Fleck, N. A., O’Masta, M. R., Wadley, H. N. G., and Deshpande, V. S.. “The out-of-plane compressive response of Dyneema® composites.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 70, pp. 200226 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B., Khaderi, S. N., Deshpande, V. S., and Fleck, N. A.. “The effect of matrix shear strength on the out-of-plane compressive strength of CFRP cross-ply laminates.International Journal of Solids and Structures, 139-140, pp. 7995 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blok, L. G., Longana, M. L., Yu, H., and Woods, B. K. S.. “An investigation into 3D printing of fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites.Additive Manufacturing, 22, pp. 176186 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caminero, M. A., Chacon, J. M., Garcia-Moreno, I., and Reverte, J. M.. “Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling.Polymer Testing, 68, pp. 415423 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Andrew N., James, N. Barry, McDonnell, Kevin A., and Denis, P. Dowling. “Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing.Additive Manufacturing, 16, pp. 146152 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justo, J., Tavara, L., Garcia-Guzman, L., and Paris, F.. “Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites.Composite Structures, 185, pp. 537548 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abadi, Haider Al, Thai, Huu-Tai, Paton-Cole, Vidal, and Patel, V. I.. “Elastic properties of 3D printed fibre-reinforced 14. structures.Composite Structures, 193, pp. 818 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, X., Liu, T., Yang, C., Wang, Q. and Li, D., “Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites”. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 88, pp. 198205 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oztan, C., Karkkainen, R., Fittipaldi, M., Nygren, G., Roberson, L., Lane, M. and Celik, E., “Microstructure and mechanical properties of three dimensional-printed continuous fiber composites”. Journal of Composite Materials, 53, pp. 271280 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J. and Wang, S., “Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling”. Composites Part B: Engineering, 80, pp.369378 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N., Li, Y. and Liu, S., “Rapid prototyping of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polylactic acid composites by 3D printing”. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 238, pp. 218225 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, T. V., and Wronski, A. S.. “The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the tensile properties of pultruded CFRP.Journal of Materials Science, 20, pp. 21412147 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, P. J., Duckett, R. A., Kaddour, A. S., Hinton, M. J., and Wells, G. M.. “The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical properties of glass fibre/epoxy unidirectional composites.Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36, pp. 279289 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigley, R. H., Wronski, A. S., and Parry, T. V.. “Tensile failure of pultruded glass-polyester composites under superimposed hydrostatic pressure.Composites Science and Technology, 41, pp. 395409 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinoviev, Peter A., and Sergey, V. Tsvetkov. “Mechanical properties of unidirectional organic-fiber-reinforced plastics under hydrostatic pressure.Composites Science and Technology, 58, pp. 3139 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B. G., Kandan, K., Wadley, H. N. G., and Deshpande, V. S.. “Deep penetration of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composites by a sharp-tipped punch.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 123, pp. 80102 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asaro, R. J., and Needleman, Alan. “Texture Development and Strain Hardening in Rate Dependent Polycrystals”. Acta Metallurgica, 33, pp. 923953 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar