Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T12:20:56.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Assesment of the Impacted Composite Single-Lap Adhesive Joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

H. Çallioğlu  and
E. Ergun
H. Çallioğlu
Affiliation:
Pamukkale University, Automotive Engineering Department, Denizli, Turkey
E. Ergun*
Affiliation:
Pamukkale University, Mechanical Engineering Department, Denizli, Turkey
*
* Corresponding author (eminergun@pau.edu.tr)
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this experimental study is to investigate impact behaviors of thecomposite single-lap adhesive joints. The increasing impact energies, which areranged from approximately 5 J to 30 J, are performed at the center of thecomposite plates having three different overlap lengths. It is shown that theoverlap lengths and impact energy levels affect considerably the impactresponses of the composite single lap joints. It is also shown that the bendingstiffness of the composite increases by increase in the overlap length. Anenergy profiling method (EPM) is used to identify the penetration andperforation thresholds of composite lap joints. The damaged composite plates arevisually inspected.

Keywords

Composite Lap JointAdhesiveImpactDamage
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 433 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sayer, M., Bektaş, N. B. and Çallioğlu, H., “Impact Behavior of Hybrid Composite Plates,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 118, pp. 580–587 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sayer, M., Bektaş, N. B. and Sayman, O., “An Experimental Investigation on the Impact Behavior of Hybrid Composite Plates,” Composite Structures, 92, pp. 1256–1262 (2010).Google Scholar
3.Atas, C. and Liu, D., “Impact Response of Woven Composites with Small Weaving Angles,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35, pp. 80–97 (2008).Google Scholar
4.Onal, L. and Adanur, S., “Effect of Stacking Sequence on the Mechanical Properties of Glass-Carbon Hybrid Composites Before and After Impact,” Journal of Industrial Textiles, 31, pp. 255–271 (2002).Google Scholar
5.Caprino, G., Lopresto, V., Scarponi, C. and Briotti, G., “Influence of Material Thickness on the Response of Carbon-Fabric/Epoxy Panels to Low Velocity Impact,” Composites Science and Technology, 59, pp. 2279–2286 (1999).Google Scholar
6.Kim, J. S. and Chung, S. K., “A Study on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Laminates for Composite Railway Bodyshells,” Composite Structures, 77, pp. 484–492 (2007).Google Scholar
7.Datta, S., Krishna, A. V. and Rao, R. M. V. G. K., “Low Velocity Impact Damage Tolerance Studies on Glass-Epoxy Laminates - Effects of Material, Process and Test Parameters,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 23, pp. 327–345 (2004).Google Scholar
8.Sawa, T. and Suga, H., “Proceedings of International Conference on Experimental Mechanics: Advances and Applications Book Series: Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), pp. 350–355 (1997).Google Scholar
9.Higuchi, L., Sawa, T. and Suga, H., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single-Lap Adhesive Joints Under Impact Loads,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 16, pp. 1585–1601 (2002).Google Scholar
10.Apalak, M. K. and Yildirim, M., “Effect of Adhesive Thickness on Transverse Low-Speed Impact Behavior of Adhesively Bonded Similar and Dissimilar Clamped Plates,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 25, pp. 2587–2613 (2011).Google Scholar
11.Ribeiro, F. L., Borges, L. and Almeida, J. R. M., “Numerical Stress Analysis of Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Composite Single-Lap Joints,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 31, pp. 331–337 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Xu, W. and Wei, Y. G., “Assessments for Impact of Adhesive Properties: Modeling Strength of Metallic Single Lap Joints,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 27, pp. 9–29 (2013).Google Scholar
13.Park, H. and Kim, H., “Damage Resistance of Single Lap Adhesive Composite Joints by Transverse Ice Impact,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, pp. 177–184 (2010).Google Scholar
14.Ma, Y. Y., Zhang, K. F., Yang, Z. J. and Li, Y. A., Advanced Materials Science and Technology, PTS 1-2 Book Series: Advanced Materials Research, 181-182 Part 1, pp. 814–819 (2011).Google Scholar
15.Choi, I. H. and Lim, C. H., “Low-Velocity Impact Analysis of Composite Laminates Using Linearized Contact Law,” Composite Structures, 66, pp. 125–132 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Liu, D., Raju, B. B. and Dang, X., “Impact Perforation Resistance of Laminated and Assembled Composite Plates,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 24, pp. 733–746 (2000).Google Scholar
17.Liu, D. S., “Characterization of Impact Properties and Damage Process of Glass/Epoxy Composite Laminates,” Journal of Composite Materials, 38, pp. 1425–1442 (2004).Google Scholar
18.Callioglu, H., Sayer, M. and Demir, E., “Impact Behavior of Particles Filled-Glass/Polyester Composite Plates,” Polymer Composites, 32, pp. 1125–1133 (2011).Google Scholar