Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:47:54.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attenuation for the Simple Expansion Chamber Muffler with a Right Angle Inlet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2011

C.-H. Wu  and
C.-N. Wang
C.-H. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
C.-N. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
**Graduate student, corresponding author
Get access

Abstract

The simple expansion chamber muffler is a base control device whose use is to attenuate sound power, and has been known for a long time. Some of the most compelling research has focused on the mufflers with a straight inlet and outlet. To date, a muffler with a right angle inlet has never been studied. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to analyze the simple expansion chamber muffler with a right angle inlet. The numerical results show a comparable agreement between the experiment and other numerical approaches. A discussion is also presented in this work on the muffler with a different radius to that of the inlet/outlet pipe, a different inlet part, etc. The result clearly shows that the attenuation of the muffler with a right angle inlet is better than that with a straight inlet at particular frequencies. In addition, the mufflers do not have any absorbent linings attached to the inside of them, unlike the right angle-inlets which do. However, the propagation of sound in the muffler with a right angle inlet can lead its sound power to be attenuated about 10 ∼ 40dB at those particular frequencies.

Keywords

MufflerSilencerBoundary element methodTransfer function
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 287 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Barbieri, R. and Barbieri, N., “Finite Element Acoustic Simulation Based Shape Optimization of a Muffler,” Applied Acoustical, 67, pp. 346–357 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Young, C. I. J. and Crocker, M. J., “Prediction of Transmission Loss in Mufflers by the Finite-element Method,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, pp. 144–148 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Mehdizadeh, O. Z. and Paraschivoiu, M., “A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Approach for Predicting the Transmission Loss in Mufflers and Silencers with No Mean Flow,” Applied Acoustical, 66, pp. 902–918 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Peat, K. S. and Rathi, K. L., “A Finite Element Analysis of the Convected Acoustic Wave Motion in Dissipative Silencers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 184, pp. 529–545 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cummings, A. and Astley, R. J., “Finite Element Computation of Attenuation in Bar-Silencers and Comparison with Measured Data,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 196, pp. 351–369 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Wu, T. W., Cheng, C. Y. R. and Tao, Z., “Boundary Element Analysis of Packed Silencers with Protective Cloth and Embedded Thin Surfaces,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 261, pp. 1–15 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Ji, Z. L., “Boundary Element Analysis of a Straight-through Hybrid Silencer,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 292, pp. 415–423 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Wang, C. N., “A Boundary Element Analysis for Simple Expansion Silencers with Mean Flow,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, 23, pp. 529–536 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wang, C. N., “A Numerical Analysis for Perforated Muffler Components with Mean Flow,” Journal of Vibration Acoustical, 121, pp. 231–236 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wang, C. N., “Numerical Decoupling Analysis of a Resonator with Absorbent Material,” Applied Acoustical, 58, pp. 109–122 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Wang, C. N. and Liao, C. Y., “Boundary Integral Equation Method for Evaluating the Performance of Straight-through Resonator with Mean Flow,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 216, pp. 281–294 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Panigrahi, S. N. and Munjal, M. L., “Plane Wave Propagation in Generalized Multiply Connected Acoustic Filters,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, pp. 2860–2868 (2005).Google Scholar
13. Kar, T. and Munjal, M. L., “Plane Wave Analysis of Acoustic Wedges Using the Boundary-Condition-Transfer Algorithm,” Applied Acoustical, 67, pp. 901–917 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Munjal, M. L., “Plane Wave Analysis of Side Inlet/Outlet Chamber Mufflers with Mean Flow,” Applied Acoustical, 52, pp. 165–175 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wang, C. N., Wu, C. H. and Wu, T. D., “A network Approach for Analysis of Silencers with/Without Absorbent Material,” Applied Acoustical, 70, pp. 208–214 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Denia, F. D., Selamet, A., Fuenmayor, F. J. and Kirby, R., “Acoustic Attenuation Performance of Perforated Dissipative Mufflers with Empty Inlet/Outlet Extensions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 302, pp. 1000–1017 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Munjal, M. L., “Analysis and Design of Pod Silencers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 262, pp. 497–507 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sohei, N., Tsuyoshi, N. and Takashi, Y., “Acoustic Analysis of Elliptical Muffler Chamber Having a Perforated Pipe,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 297, pp. 761–773 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wang, C. N., “A Numerical Scheme for the Analysis of Perforated Intruding Tube Muffler Components,” Applied Acoustical, 44, pp. 275–286 (1995).Google Scholar
20. Selamet, A. and Ji, Z. L., “Acoustic Attenuation Performance of Circular Expansion Chamber with Extended Inlet/Outlet,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 223, pp. 197–212 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Selamet, A., Denia, F. D. and Besa, A. J., “Acoustic Behavior of Circular Dual-Chamber Mufflers,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 265, pp. 967–985 (2003).Google Scholar
22. Wu, C. J., Wang, X. J. and Tang, H. B., “Transmission Loss Prediction on a Single-Inlet/Double-Outlet Cylindrical Expansion-Chamber Muffler by Using the Modal Meshing Approach,” Applied Acoustical, 69, pp. 173–178 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Denia, F. D. and Selamet, A., “Letter to Editor ‘Transmission Loss Prediction on a Single-Inlet/Double-Outlet Cylindrical Expansion-Chamber Muffler by Using the Modal Meshing Approach’ by C. J. Wu, X. J. Wang, H. B. Tang’,” Applied Acoustical, 69, pp. 280–281 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Tang, H. B., “Reply to Comments on ‘Transmission Loss Prediction on a Single-Inlet/Double-Outlet Cylindrical Expansion-Chamber Muffler by Using the Modal Meshing Approach’,” Applied Acoustical, 69, p. 282 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Denia, F. D. and Selamet, A., “Remark on Reply to Comments on ‘Transmission Loss Prediction on a Single-Inlet/Double-Outlet Cylindrical Expansion-Chamber Muffler by Using the Modal Meshing Approach’,” Applied Acoustical, 69, pp. 283–284 (2008).Google Scholar
26. Tanaka, T., Fujikawa, T., Abe, T. and Utsuno, H., “A Method for the Analytical Prediction of Insertion Loss of a Two-dimensional Muffler Model Based on the Transfer Matrix Derived from the Boundary Element Method,” Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 107, pp. 86–91 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Chen, J. T. and Hong, H. K., “Review of Dual Boundary Element Methods with Emphasis on Hypersingular Integrals and Divergent Series,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, ASME, 52, pp. 17–33 (1999).Google Scholar
28. Chung, J. Y. and Blaser, D. A., “Transfer Function Method of Measuring In-Duct Acoustic Properties. I. Theory,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, pp. 907–913 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Chung, J. Y. and Blaser, D. A., “Transfer Function Method of Measuring In-Duct Acoustic Properties. II. Experiment,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, pp. 914–921 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar