Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:59:51.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compressive Mechanical Property Analysis of Eva Foam: Its Buffering Effects at Different Impact Velocities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

D.-S. Liu ,
Z.-H. Chen ,
C.-Y. Tsai ,
R.-J. Ye  and
K.-T. Yu
D.-S. Liu
Affiliation:
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing for High-Tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-Yi, Taiwan
Z.-H. Chen*
Affiliation:
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing for High-Tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-Yi, Taiwan
C.-Y. Tsai
Affiliation:
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing for High-Tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-Yi, Taiwan
R.-J. Ye
Affiliation:
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing for High-Tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-Yi, Taiwan
K.-T. Yu
Affiliation:
Advanced Institute of Manufacturing for High-Tech Innovations and Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chung Cheng UniversityChia-Yi, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author (ceo2009@msn.com)
Get access

Abstract

EVA foams, like all other polymers, also exhibit strain-rate effects and hysteresis. However, currently available approaches for predicting the mechanical response of polymeric foam subjected to an arbitrarily imposed loading history and strain-rate effect are highly limited. Especially, the strain rates in the intermediate rate domain (between 100 and 102 s–1) are extremely difficult to study. The use of data generated through the drop tower technique for implementation in constitutive equations or numerical models has not been considered in past studies. In this study, an experiment including a quasi-static compression test and drop impact tests with a high speed camera was conducted. An inverse analysis technique combined with a finite element model for material parameter identification was developed to determine the stress–strain behavior of foam at different specific strain rates. It was used in this study to simulate multiple loading and unloading cycles on foam specimens, and the results were compared with experimental measurements.

Keywords

EVA foamStrain-rate effectInverse analysis techniqueFinite element model
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 435 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cook, S.D. and Kester, M.A., “Biomechanics of running shoe performance,” Clinics in Sports Medicine, 4, pp. 619–626 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Hennig, E. M. and Milan, T. L., “In-Shoe pressure distribution for running in various,” Journal of Applied Biomechanical, 11, pp. 299–310 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Shorten, M.R., “Running shoe design: protection and performance,” Marathon Medicine, Pedoe, T., ed., Royal Society of Medicine, London, pp. 159–169 (2000).Google Scholar
4. DuraÂ, J. V., GarcõÂa, A. C. and Solaz, J., “Testing shock absorbing materials: the application of viscoelastic linear model,” Sports Engineering, 5, pp. 9–14 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Chan, Y. L. and Ngan, A. H. W., “Invariant elastic modulus of viscoelastic materials measured by rate-jump tests,” Polymer Testing, 29, pp. 558–564 (2010).Google Scholar
6. Field, J. E., “Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 30, pp. 725–775 (2004)Google Scholar
7. Cavanagh, P. R. and Kram, R., “Stride length in distance running: velocity, body dimensions, and added mass effects,” Biomechanics of Distance Running, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, Cavanagh, P. R., ed., pp. 35–63 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Atwater, A. E., “Stride length in distance running: velocity, body dimensions, and added mass effects,” Biomechanics of Distance Running, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, Cavanagh, P. R., ed., pp. 321–362 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics, Sharpe, J. and William, N., eds., Springer, Berlin (2007).Google Scholar
10. Coffey, C. S. and DeVost, V. F., “Drop weight impact machines: a review of recent progress,” JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting CPIA Publication, 1, pp. 527–531 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Viot, R. P. and Lataillade, J. L., “Polypropylene foam behavior under dynamic loadings: strain rate, density and microstructure effects,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36, pp. 329–342 (2009).Google Scholar
12. “Standard test methods for rubber properties in compression,” ASTM D575, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2012).Google Scholar
13. “Standard test methods for rubber properties in tension,” ASTM D412, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2015).Google Scholar
14. Torczon, V., “On the convergence of pattern search algorithms,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, 7, pp. 1–25 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Audet, C., “Convergence results for generalized pattern search algorithms are tight,” Optimization and Engineering, 5, pp. 101–122 (2004).Google Scholar