Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:58:51.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Stall Analysis of S809 Pitching Airfoil in Unsteady Free Stream Velocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

H. R. Karbasian ,
S. A. Moshizi  and
M. J. Maghrebi
H. R. Karbasian
Affiliation:
Sun–Air Research Institute, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
S. A. Moshizi
Affiliation:
Sun–Air Research Institute, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
M. J. Maghrebi*
Affiliation:
Sun–Air Research Institute, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
*
* Corresponding author (mjmaghrebi@um.ac.ir)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, the dynamic stall of S809 airfoil that widely used in horizontal axis wind turbine, in different reduced frequencies is investigated. The simulation was carried out numerically handling Navier-Stokes equations. For this purpose, the segregated solver with SIMPLE algorithm was chosen to solve the momentum equations. The effect of turbulence on the flow field is taken into account using Shear Stress Transport (SST) K-ω turbulence model. The obtained numerical results are compared with experimental and a few numerical results. The results indicate that the K-ω SST model is in good agreement with experimental results for both steady and unsteady conditions. Furthermore, a non-dimensional parameter, relating the acceleration of unsteady free stream velocity and acceleration of pitch motion (known as reduced frequency), is also investigated. In addition, the results show that any increase in the reduced frequency increases the instantaneous aerodynamic characteristics of oscillating airfoil.

Keywords

Dynamic stallS809 airfoilReduced frequencyAerodynamic characteristics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 227 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2016 

References

1.Johansen, J., Unsteady Airfoil Flows with Application to Aeroelastic Stability, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark (1999).Google Scholar
2.Gupta, S. and Leishman, J. G., “Dynamic Stall Modelling of the S809 Aerofoil and Comparison with Experiments,” Wind Energy, 9, pp. 521–547 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gonzalez, A. and Munduate, X., “Unsteady Modelling of the Oscillating S809 Aerofoil and NREL Phase VI Parked Blade Using the Beddoes-Leishman Dynamic Stall Model,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 75, pp. 012020–012028 (2007).Google Scholar
4.Sheng, W., Galbraith, R. A. M. and Coton, F. N., “On the S809 Airfoil’s Unsteady Aerodynamic Characteristics,” Wind Energy, 12, pp. 752–767 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Leishman, J. G., “Dynamic Stall Experiments on the NACA 23012 Aerofoil,” Experiments in Fluids, 9, pp. 49–58 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ramsay, R. R., Hoffman, J., Gregorek, G. M., University, O. S. and Laboratory, N. R. E., “Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S809 Airfoil,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (1995).Google Scholar
7.Somers, D. M., Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado (1997).Google Scholar
8.Sadeghi, H., Mani, M. and Ardakani, M. A., “Effect of Amplitude and Mean Angle of Attack on Wake of an Oscillating Airfoil,” Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technolog, 45, p. 125 (2008).Google Scholar
9.Wang, S., Ingham, D. B., Ma, L., Pourkashanian, M. and Tao, Z., “Numerical Investigations on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Oscillating Airfoils,” Computers & Fluids, 39, pp. 1529–1541 (2010).Google Scholar
10.Amiralaei, M. R., Alighanbari, H. and Hashemi, S. M., “An Investigation Into the Effects of Unsteady Parameters on the Aerodynamics of a Low Reynolds Number Pitching Airfoil,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, 26, pp. 979–993 (2010).Google Scholar
11.Gharali, K. and Johnson, D. A., “Numerical Modeling of an S809 Airfoil Under Dynamic Stall, Erosion and High Reduced Frequencies,” Applied Energy, 93, pp. 45–52 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lu, K., Xie, Y. H., Zhang, D. and Lan, J. B., “Numerical Investigations Into the Asymmetric Effects on the Aerodynamic Response of a Pitching Airfoil,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, 39, pp. 76–86 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Menter, F. R., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AI-AA Journal, 32, pp. 1598–1605 (1994).Google Scholar
15.Karbasian, H. R., Esfahani, J. A. and Barati, E., “Effect of Acceleration on Dynamic Stall of Airfoil in Unsteady Operating Conditions,” Wind Energy, DOI: 10.1002/we.1818 (2014).Google Scholar
16.Srinivasan, G. R., Ekaterinaris, J. A. and McCroskey, W J., “Evaluation of Turbulence Models for Unsteady Flows of an Oscillating Airfoil,” Computers & Fluids, 24, pp. 833–861 (1995).Google Scholar
17.Steiner, S., Krämer, E., Eulitz, A. and Armbruster, P., “Aeroelastic Analysis of Wind Turbines Applying 3D CFD Computational Results,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 75, p. 012015 (2007).Google Scholar
18.Moshizi, S. A., Nakhaei, M. H., Kermani, M. J. and Madadi, A., “Development of a Numerical Based Correlation for Performance Losses due to Surface Roughness in Axial Turbines,” Journal of Mechanics, 30, pp. 631–642 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Moshizi, S. A., Madadi, A. and Kermani, M. J., “Comparison of Inviscid and Viscous Transonic Flow Field in VKI Gas Turbine Blade Cascade,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53, pp. 275–280 (2014).Google Scholar