Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:16:55.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Full-Scale Simulations of Magnetorheological Damper for Implementation of Semi-Actively Structural Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Y. B. Peng ,
Z. K. Zhang ,
J. G. Yang  and
L. H. Wang
Y. B. Peng*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai, China Shanghai Institute of Disaster Prevention and Relief Tongji University Shanghai, China
Z. K. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai, China
J. G. Yang
Affiliation:
College of Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai, China
L. H. Wang
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics Tongji University Shanghai, China
*
* Corresponding author (pengyongbo@tongji.edu.cn)
Get access

Abstract

Full-scale simulations of a (Magnetorheological) MR damper are carried out for revealing its hysteretic behaviors associated with implementation of semi-active control using the routine of computational fluid dynamics. By virtue of the structural symmetry of the MR damper, a two-dimensional configuration for finite element simulation is built up. Herschel-Bulkley model is employed to represent the property of the MR fluid, of which the control parameters and their relevances to the input current are addressed. Typical cases involving sinusoidal and irregular displacements, steady and transient currents loaded upon the MR damper are investigated. Numerical investigations reveal that the damper force has a positive correlation with input current, excitation amplitude and excitation frequency. The full-scale simulation is proved to exhibit a sound accuracy through the validation of experimental data. It provides a logical manner revealing the true performance of MR dampers under desirable operating modes in practice, and can be readily integrated with the gain design of the associated semi-actively controlled structure. This progress bypasses the technical challenge inherent in the traditional tests with low-frequency cyclic loadings due to the limitation of experimental setup. Besides, comparative study between two-dimensional and three-dimensional configuration simulations of the MR damper shows that former has a better applicability, which can be carried out on a low-cost platform.

Keywords

MR damperFinite element simulationHysteretic behaviorsComputational fluid dynamicsHerschel-Bulkley modelSemi-active control
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 549 - 562
Copyright
© The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Spencer, B. F. Jr and Nagarajaiah, S., “State of the Art of Structural Control,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, pp. 845–856 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olabi, A. G. and Grunwald, A., “Design and Application of Magneto-Rheological Fluid,” Materials & Design, 28, pp. 2658–2664 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milecki, A., “Investigation and Control of Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 41, pp. 379–391 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, T. and Chang, C. C., “Shear-Mode Rotary Magnetorheological Damper for Small-Scale Structural Control Experiments,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, pp. 904–911 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, C., “A Disk-Type Magneto-Theological Fluid Damper for Rotor System Vibration Control,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 283, pp. 1051–1069 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chooi, W. W. and Oyadiji, S. O., “Design, Modeling and Testing of Magnetorheological (MR) Dampers Using Analytical Flow Solutions,” Computers & Structures, 86, pp. 473–482 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. S., “Design and Research on Magneto-Rheological Damper Support for Magnetic Bearing,” M. S. Thesis. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China (2012). [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Yazid, I. I., Mazlan, S. A., Kikuchi, T., Zamzuri, H. and Imaduddin, F., “Magnetic Circuit Optimization in Designing Magnetorheological Damper,” Smart Structures and Systems, 14, pp. 869–881 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Y., Zhang, L. and Zhu, H. T., “Simplified Design Method for Shear-Valve Magnetorheological Dampers,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13, pp. 637–652 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, J. W. et al., “Design and Fabrication of 500-kN Large-Scale MR Damper,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22, pp. 475–487 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sodeyama, H., Suzuki, K. and Sunakoda, K., “Development of Large Capacity Semi-Active Seismic Damper Using Magneto-Rheological Fluid,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 126, pp. 105–109 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ni, Y. Q., Chen, Y., Ko, J. M. and Cao, D. Q., “Neuro-Control of Cable Vibration Using Semi-Active Magneto-Rheological Dampers,” Engineering Structures, 24, pp. 295–307 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, K. M., Jung, H. J., Cho, S. W. and Lee, I. W., “Application of Smart Passive Damping System Using MR Damper to Highway Bridge Structure,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 21, pp. 870–874 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y. B., Yang, J. G. and Li, J., “Parameter Identification of Modified Bouc-Wen Model and Analysis of Size Effect of Magnetorheological Dampers,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 29, pp. 1464–1480 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasrebi, N., Ghazavi, A. and Mashhadi, M. M., “Magneto-Rhelogical Fluid Dampers Modeling: Numerical and Experimental,” Proceedings of the 17th IASTED International Conference Modeling and Simulation, Montreal, Canada (2006).Google Scholar
Gedik, E., Kurt, H., Recebli, Z. and Balan, C. “Two-Dimensional CFD Simulation of Magneto-Rheological Fluid between Two Fixed Parallel Plates Applied External Magnetic Field,” Computers & Fluids, 63, pp. 128–134 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parlak, Z. and Engin, T., “Time-Dependent CFD and Quasi-Static Analysis of Magnetorheological Fluid Dampers with Experimental Validation,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 64, pp. 22–31 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z. D., Jia, D. H. and Zhang, X. C., “Performance Tests and Mathematical Model Considering Magnetic Saturation for Magnetorheological Damper,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 23, pp. 1331–1349 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G., “Large-Scale Magnetorheological Fluid Damper for Vibration Mitigation: Modeling, Testing and Control,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A. (2001).Google Scholar
Peng, Y. B. and Li, J., “Multiscale Analysis of Stochastic Fluctuations of Dynamic Yield of Magnetorheological Fluids,” International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 9, pp. 175–191 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y. B., Ghanem, R. and Li, J., “Investigations of Microstructured Behaviors of Magnetorheological Suspensions,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 23, pp. 1351–1370 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y., Yang, J. and Li, J., “Seismic Risk-Based Stochastic Optimal Control of Structures Using Magnetorheological Dampers,” Natural Hazards Review, 18, B4016001 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Peng, Y. B. and Chen, J. B., “Nonlinear Stochastic Optimal Control Strategy of Hysteretic Structures,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 38, pp. 39–63 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, X. C., Guo, P. F. and Ou, J., “Study of the Response Time of MR Dampers,” Proceedings of SPIE 7493, Second International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering, 74930U, doi: 10.1117/12.840217 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar