Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:06:21.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Method of Fundamental Solutions for Stokes Problems by the Pressure-Stream Function Formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

D. L. Young ,
J. T. Wu  and
C. L. Chiu
D. L. Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
J. T. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
C. L. Chiu*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
*Professor
**Ph.D. student
***Postdoctoral Fellow
Get access

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the pressure-stream function formulation to solve 2D and 3D Stokes flows by the meshless numerical scheme of the method of fundamental solutions (MFS). The MFS can be regarded as a truly scattered, grid-free (or meshless) and non-singular numerical scheme. By the proposed algorithm, the stream function is governed by the bi-harmonic equation while the pressure is governed by the Laplace equation. The velocity field is then obtained by the curl of the stream function for 2D flows and curl of the vector stream function for 3D flows. We can simultaneously solve the pressure, velocity, vorticity, stream function and traction forces fields. Furthermore during the present numerical procedure no pressure boundary condition is needed which is a tedious and forbidden task. The developed algorithm is used to test several numerical experiments for the benchmark examples, including (1) the driven circular cavity, (2) the circular cavity with eccentric rotating cylinder, (3) the square cavity with traction boundary conditions and (4) the uniform flow past a sphere. The results compare very well with the solutions obtained by analytical or other numerical methods such as finite element method (FEM). It is found that the meshless MFS will give a simpler and more efficient and accurate solutions to the Stokes flows investigated in this study.

Keywords

Method of fundamental solutionsStokes flowsStream functionBi-harmonic equationLaplace equationMeshless numerical method.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 137 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Abousleiman, Y. and Cheng, A. H.-D., “Boundary Element Solution for Steady and Unsteady Stokes Flow,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 117, pp. 1–13 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Young, D. L., Chen, C. W., Fan, C. M., Murugesan, K. and and Tsai, C. C., “Method of Fundamental Solutions for Stokes Flows in a Rectangular Cavity with Cylinders,” Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids, 24, pp. 703–716 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Young, D. L., Jane, S. J., Fan, C. M., Murugesan, K. and Tsai, C. C., “The Method of Fundamental Solutions for 2D and 3D Stokes Problems,” J. Comput. Phys., 211, pp. 1–8(2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chen, C. W., Young, D. L., Tsai, C. C. and Murugesan, K., “The Method of Fundamental Solutions for Inverse 2D Stokes Problems,” Compu. Mech., 37, pp. 2–14 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tsai, C. C., Young, D. L., Lo, D. C. and Wong, T. K., “Method of Fundamental Solutions for Three-Dimensional Stokes Flow in Exterior Field,” J. Eng. Mech., 132, pp. 317–326 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Fan, C. M. and Young, D. L., “Analysis of the 2D Stokes Flows by the Non -Singular Boundary Element Method,” Int. Math. J., 2, pp. 1199–1215 (2002).Google Scholar
7.Young, D. L., Jane, S. J., Lin, C. Y., Chiu, C. L. and Chen, K. C., “Solutions of 2D and 3D Stokes Laws Using Multiquadrics Method,” Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 28, pp. 1233–1243 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tsai, C. C., Young, D. L. and Cheng, A. H.-D., “Meshless BEM for Three-Dimensional Stokes Flows,” CMES: Comp. Model. Eng. Sci., 3, pp.117–128 (2002).Google Scholar
9.Karageorghis, A. and Fairweather, G., “The Method of Fundamental Solutions for the Numerical Solution of the Bi-Harmonic Equation,” J. Comput.Phys., 69, pp. 434–459 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Karageorghis, A. and Fairweather, G., “The Almansi Method of Fundamental Solutions for Solving Bi-Harmonic Problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 26, pp. 1668–1682 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Smyrlis, Y. S. and Karageorghis, A., “Some Aspects of the Method of Fundamental Solutions for Certain Bi-Harmonic Problems,” CMES: Comp. Model. Eng. Sci., 4, pp. 535–550 (2003).Google Scholar
12.Young, D. L., Chiu, C. L., Fan, C. M., Tsai, C. C. and Lin, Y. C., “Method of Fundamental Solutions for Multidimensional Stokes Equation by the Dual-Potential Formulation,” Eur. J. Mech. B, Fluids, 25, pp. 877–893 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hu, S. P., Fan, C. M., Chen, C. W. and Young, D. L., “Method of Fundamental Solutions for Stokes ’ First and Second Problems,” Journal of Mechanics, 21, pp. 25–31(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Tsai, C. C., Young, D. L. and Fan, C. M., “Method of Fundamental Solutions for Plate Vibrations in Multiply Connected Domains,” Journal of Mechanics, 22, pp. 235–245 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hirasaki, G. J. and Hellums, J. D., “Boundary Conditions on the Vector and Scalar Potentials in Viscous Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamics,” Q. Appl. Math., 28, pp. 293–296 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hwu, T. Y., Young, D. L. and Chen, Y. Y., “Chaotic Advections for Stokes Flow in a Circular Cavity,” J. Eng. Mech., 123, pp.774–782 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Triton, D. J., Physical Fluid Dynamics, Oxford University Press, New York (1988).Google Scholar