Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:54:27.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Progressive Failure Analysis of Uni-Directional Fibre Reinforced Composite Laminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2020

T. Yi*
Affiliation:
NX Nastran Development Group of PPDC CAE Department, Siemens Industry Software Co., Ltd., Shanghai, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author (ting.yi@siemens.com)
Get access

Abstract

The three dimensional standard damage model developed by Lavedeze et.al [9, 13] for uni-directional fibre reinforced ply is implemented into the nonlinear solution of NX Nastran within composite solid element to analyze the progressive damage process and ultimate failure of fibre reinforced composite laminates. This ply level meso-damage-constitutive-model takes into account main damage mechanisms including fibre breaking, matrix transverse cracking, and fibre/matrix de-bonding; also considers contributions like plasticity coupling, damage delay effects, and elastic nonlinearity in fibre compression. Dissipated energy and damage status are also introduced to reflect the damage condition on the macrostructural-level. Using the implemented code, simulation is carried out on the uniaxial tension of a [±45]2s laminate with IM6/914 material, wherein the predicted ply shear rupture stress matches the experimental results very well and better than the theoretical predictions in literature. Moreover, a [-45/0/45/90] holed laminate loaded in tension is simulated to show the complex behavior of subcritical damage evolution and failure process in the composite structure. The composite solid element with damage model supported in NX Nastran is shown to be a reliable tool to analyze the progressive failure of uni-directional fibre reinforced composite laminates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jones, R. M., Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, New York. (1999).Google Scholar
Herakovich, C., Mechanics of Fibrous Composites, John Wiley and Sons Incorporation, New York (1998).Google Scholar
Nairn, J. A. and Hu, S., “Micromechanics of damage: a case study of matrix cracking,Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials, In: Talreja, R., editor, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 187243 (1994).Google Scholar
Berthelot, J. M., “Transverse cracking and delamination in cross-ply glass-fiber and carbon-fiber reinforced plastic laminates: static and fatigue loading,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, 56(1), pp. 137 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashin, Z., “Analysis of cracked laminates: a variational approach,” Mechanics of Materials, 4, pp. 121136 (1985).Google Scholar
Hashin, Z., “Analysis of orthogonally cracked laminates under tension,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 4, pp. 121136 (1985).Google Scholar
Aboudi, L., Lee, S. W., and Herakowich, C. T., “Three dimensional analysis of laminates with cross cracks,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 55, pp. 389397 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P. and Dantec, E. Le., “Damage modeling of the elementary ply for laminated composites,” Composites Science and Technology, 43, pp. 257267 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., “A damage computational method for composite structures,” Journal of Computer and Structure, 44(1-2), pp. 7987 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allix, O. and Ladevèze, P., “Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of delamination,” Composite Structures, 22, pp. 235242 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allix, O., Ladevèze, P. and Vittecoq., E.Modelling and identification of the mechanical behavior of composite laminates in compression,” Composites Science and Technology, 51, pp. 3542 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., “A damage computational approach for composites: Basic aspects and micromechanical relations,” Computational Mechanics, 17(1-2), pp.142150 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., Allix, O., Deu, J., and Leveque, F. D., “A mesomodel for localisation and damage computation in laminates,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering, 1832, pp. 105122 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., and Lubineau, G., “On a damage mesomodel for laminates: micro-meso relationships, possibilities and limits,” Composite Science and Technology, 61(15), pp. 21492158 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladev è ze, P. and Lubineau, G., “An enhanced mesomodel for laminates based on micromechanics,” Composite Science and Technology, 62(14), pp. 533541 (2002).Google Scholar
Ladev è ze, P. and Lubineau, G., “On a damage mesomodel for laminates: micromechanics basis and improvement,” Mechanics of Materials, 35, pp. 763775 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladev è ze, P., “A bridge between the micro- and mesomechanics of laminates: fantasy or reality?Mechanics of the 21st Century, Chapter, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 187201 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèsze, P., Lubineau, G., and Violeau, D., “A computational damage micromodel of laminated composites,” International Journal of Fracture, 137(1-4), pp. 139150 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., “Multiscale Computational Damage Modelling of Laminated Composites,CISM Courses and Lectures, SpringerWien, New York, pp. 171212 (2005).Google Scholar
Lubineau, G., Ladev è ze, P., and Violeau, D.Durability of CFRP laminates under thermomechanical loading: A micro-meso damage model,” Composite Science and Technology, 66(7-8), pp. 983992 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubineau, G. and Ladevèze, P., “Construction of a micromechanics-based intralaminar mesomodel and illustrations in ABAQUS/Standard,” Computational Materials Science, 43, pp. 137145 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubineau, G., Violeau, D., and Ladev è ze, P., “Illustrations of a microdamage model for laminates under oxidizing thermal cycling,” Composite Science and Technology, 69(1), pp. 39 (2009).Google Scholar
Violeau, D., Ladev è ze, P., and Lubineau, G., “Micromodel-based simulations for laminated composites,” Composite Science and Technology, 69(9), pp.13641371 (2009).Google Scholar
Abisset, E., Daghia, F., and Ladevèze, P., “On the validation of a damage mesomodel for laminated composites by means of open-hole tensile tests on quasi-isotropic laminates,” Composite Part A, 42, pp. 15151524 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., Daghia, F., Abisset, E., and Mauff, C. L., “A micromechanics-based interface mesomodel for virtual testing of laminated composites,” Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 1(1), pp. 116 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daghia, F. and Ladev è ze, P., “Identification and validation of an enhanced mesomodel for laminated composites within the WWFE-III,” Journal of Composite Materials, 47(20-21), pp. 26752694 (2013).Google Scholar
Obert, E., Daghia, F., Ladevèze, P., and Ballere, L., “Micro and meso modeling of woven composites: Transverse cracking kinetics and homogenization,” Composite Structures, 117, pp. 212221 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daghia, F., Zhang, F., Cluzel, Ch., and Ladevèze, P., “Thermo-mechano-oxidative behavior at the ply’s scale: The effect of oxidation on transverse cracking in carbon-epoxy composites,” Composite Structures, 134, pp. 602612 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladevèze, P., Neron, D., and Bainier, H., “A virtual testing approach for laminated composites based on micromechanics,” the structural integrity of carbon fiber composites, Springer International publishing, Switzerland, pp. 667698 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allix, O. and Deu, J. F., “Delay-damage modeling for fracture prediction of laminated composites under dynamic loading,” Engineering Transactions, 45, pp. 2946 (1997).Google Scholar
Vittecoq, E., On the compression behaviour of carbon-epoxy laminates, Thesis, University of Paris, Paris (1991).Google Scholar