Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:10:01.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation Methodology on Analyzing Clamping Mode for Single Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

C.-Y. Wen ,
H.-T. Chang  and
T.-W. Luo
C.-Y. Wen*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C.
H.-T. Chang
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C.
T.-W. Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan 70101, R.O.C.
*
*Professor, corresponding author
Get access

Abstract

In proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), a low interfacial pressure between the bipolar plates and the membrane exchange assembly (MEA) results in a high contact resistance. Conversely, an excessive interfacial pressure reduces the porosity of the gas diffusion layer (GDLs) and may damage the proton exchange membrane (PEM). Consequently, the performance of a PEMFC is critically dependent upon the clamping method. Accordingly, this study emphasizes the development of a numerical methodology for analyzing clamping of a PEMFC and constructs a detailed three-dimensional (3D) full-scale finite element (FE) model of a PEMFC with the traditional and most popular point-load design as an example. The numerical method is first validated by experiments. A series of simulations are then performed on the example cases (i.e. 2-bolt, 4-bolt or 6-bolt) to analyze their behaviors on the contact pressure between the bipolar plates and the MEA and the corresponding effects on the GDL porosity and the contact resistance, under the constraints that the membrane and gaskets remain within their respective elastic limits and the porosity of the GDL has a value higher than 0.5. Overall, to complete the analysis procedures proposed in this paper, the results show that the six-bolt clamping mode with a tightening torque of 16 N-m achieves a uniform pressure distribution and a high interfacial pressure, and therefore represents the optimal clamping mode for the performed example cases.

Keywords

Proton exchange membrane fuel cellClamping methodThree-dimensional simulationInterfacial contact pressure.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 545 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lee, W. K., Ho, C. H., Zee, J. W. V. and Murthy, M., “The Effects of Compression and Gas Diffusion Layers on the Performance of a PEM Fuel Cell,” Journal of Power Sources, 84, pp. 45–51 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Mishra, V., Yang, F. and Pitchumani, R., “Measurement and Prediction of Electrical Contact Resistance Between Gas Diffusion Layers and Bipolar Plate for Applications to PEM Fuel Cells,” Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, ASME, 31, pp. 2–9 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wang, H., Sweikart, M. A. and Turner, J. A., “Stainless Steel as Bipolar Plate Material for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” Journal of Power Sources, 115, pp. 243–251 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tian, R., Sun, J. and Wang, L., “Plasma-Nitrided Austenitic Stainless Steel 316L as Bipolar Plate for PEMFC,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, pp. 1874–1878 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Zhan, Z., Xiao, J., Zhang, Y., Pan, M. and Yuan, R., “Gas Diffusion Through Differently Structured Gas Diffusion Layers of PEM Fuel Cells,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 4443–4451 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dohle, H., Jung, R., Kimiaie, N., Mergel, J. and Muller, M., “Interaction Between the Diffusion Layer and the Flow Field of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells—Experiments and Simulation Studies,” Journal of Power Sources, 124, pp. 371–384 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pharoah, J. G., “On the Permeability of Gas Diffusion Media Used in PEM Fuel Cells,” Journal of Power Sources, 144, pp. 77–82 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chu, D. and Jiang, R., “Performance of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Stacks: Part I. Evaluation and Simulation of an Air-Breathing PEMFC Stack,” Journal of Power Sources, 83, pp. 128–133 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Jiang, R. and Chu, D., “Stack Design and Performance of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” Journal of Power Sources, 93, pp. 25–31 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Giddey, S., Ciacchi, F. T. and Badwal, S. P. S., “Design, Assembly and Operation of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks to 1 Kwe Capacity,” Journal of Power Sources, 125, pp. 155–165 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Lee, S. J., Hsu, C. D. and Huang, C. H., “Analyses of the Fuel Cell Stack Assembly Pressure,” Journal of Power Sources, 145, pp. 353–361 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Zhou, P., Wu, C. W. and Ma, G. J., “Contact Resistance Prediction and Structure Optimization of Bipolar Plates,” Journal of Power Sources, 159, pp. 1115–1122 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zhou, P., Wu, C. W. and Ma, G. J., “Influence of Clamping Force on the Performance of PEMFCs,” Journal of Power Sources, 163, pp. 874–881 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Bograchev, D., Gueguen, M., Grandidier, J. C. and Martemianov, S., “Stress and Plastic Deformation of MEA in Fuel Cells: Stresses Generated During Cell Assembly,” Journal of Power Sources, 180, pp. 393–401 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Tang, Y., Santare, M. H. and Karlsson, A. M., “Stress in Proton Exchange Membranes Due to Hygro-Thermal Loading,” Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, ASME, 3, pp. 119–124 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kusoglu, A., Karlsson, A. M., Santare, M. H., Cleghorn, S. and Johnson, W. B., “Mechanical Response of Fuel Cell Membranes Subjected to a Hygro-Thermal Cycle,” Journal of Power Sources, 161, pp. 987–996 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kusoglu, A., Karlsson, A. M., Santare, M. H., Cleghorn, S. and Johnson, W. B., “Mechanical Behavior of Fuel Cell Membranes Under Humidity Cycles and Effect of Swelling Anisotropy on the Fatigue Stresses,” Journal of Power Sources, 170, pp. 345–358 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Tang, Y., Karlsson, A. M., Santare, M. H., Gilbert, M., Cleghorn, S. and Johnson, W. B., “An Experimental Investigation of Humidity and Temperature Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Perfluorosulfonic Acid Membrane,” Journal of Material Science and Engineering A, 425, pp. 297–304 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Wen, C. Y., Lin, Y. S. and Lu, C. H., “Performance of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack with Thermally Conductive Pyrolytic Graphite Sheets for Thermal Management,” Journal of Power Sources, 189, pp. 1100–1105 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Majumdar, A. and Tien, C. L., “Fractal Network Model for Contact Conductance,” Jt. ASME/AIChE National Heat Transfer Conference, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1–9 (1989).Google Scholar
21.Majumdar, A. and Tien, C. L., “Fractal Network Model for Contact Conductance,” Journal of Heat Transfer, 113, pp. 516–525 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Chen, W. F. and Han, D. J., Plasticity for Structural Engineers, Gau Lih Book Co., LTD. Taiwan, (1995).Google Scholar
23.http://www.fujifilm.com/, December (2009).Google Scholar
24.Wen, C. Y., Lin, Y. S. and Lu, C. H., “Experimental Study of Clamping Effects on the Performances of a Single Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell and a Ten-cell Stack,” Journal of Power Sources, 192, pp. 475–485 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. International lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee, January 23, Draft: 8, (2008).Google Scholar