Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:23:17.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Amitriptyline in depressive states

A controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. G. Burt
Affiliation:
Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital, Victoria
W. F. Gordon
Affiliation:
Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital, Victoria
N. F. Holt
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Institute, Victoria
Anthony Hordern
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Institute, Victoria

Extract

Since its introduction in 1938, electroconvulsive therapy (E.C.T.) has shown itself to be a dramatically effective, unusually safe treatment for severe depressive states (“melancholias”, “endogenous” or “psychotic” depressions). Nevertheless, it is repugnant to many patients and psychiatrists, produces a troublesome, if transient, amnesia—especially in older individuals—and is occasionally complicated by fractures and dislocations as well as by anaesthetic and relaxant misadventures. Worst of all, as early studies showed, of the 80–90 per cent. of severe depressives who respond to E.C.T., some 30 per cent. relapse (Huston and Locher, 1948 a, b). Recent work suggests that the rate of relapse may often be higher still—thus of 94 per cent. of a group of patients who had responded to E.C.T., Kiloh and Ball (1961) reported that 46 per cent. had relapsed during the six months following the cessation of treatment. For these reasons, the trend to chemotherapy initiated by the advent of effective antidepressant compounds in 1957 continues to develop, and signs are becoming manifest that within a few years E.C.T. may be replaced by pharmacotherapy.

Type
Therapeutic Trials
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, L. (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 14 supp. Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R., Collins, G. H. (1961). J. Ment. Sci., 107, 547.Google Scholar
Ayd, F. J. (1960). Psychosomatics, 1, 1.Google Scholar
Idem (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 32 supp. Google Scholar
Ball, J. R. B., Kiloh, L. J. (1959). Brit. Med. J., ii, 1052.Google Scholar
Barsa, J. A., Saunders, J. G. (1961). Am. J. Psychiat., 117, 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, E. M., Crone, N., Fitzpatrick, G., Frewin, S. J., Gillis, A., Lascelles, C. F., Levine, L. J., Merskey, H. (1960). Am. J. Psychiat., 117, 76.Google Scholar
Cade, J. F. J., Krupinski, J. (1961). Med. J. Austral., 400.Google Scholar
Dorfman, W. (1960). Psychosomatics, 1, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 41 supp. Google Scholar
Doust, J. W. L., Lewis, D. J., Miller, A., Sprott, D., Wright, R. L. D. (1959). Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4, 190 supp. Google Scholar
Dunlop, E. (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 49 supp. Google Scholar
Feldman, P. E. (1961). Dis Nerv. System, 22, 27 supp. Google Scholar
Freed, H. (1960). Am. J. Psychiat., 117, 455.Google Scholar
Freyhan, F. A. (1960). Am. J. Psychiat., 116, 1057.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. D. (1926). Brit. Med. J., ii, 878.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960). J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 23, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt., J. P., Wright, E. R., Hecker, A. O. (1960). Am. J. Psychiat., 117, 533.Google Scholar
Huston, P. E. and Locher, L. M. (1948a). Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 59, 385.Google Scholar
Iidem (1948b). Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 60, 37.Google Scholar
Kenning, I. S., Richardson, N. L. and Tucker, F. G. (1960). Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J., 5, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiloh, L. G. and Ball, J. R. B. (1961). Brit. Med. J., i, 168.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H. E., Kahn, C. H. and de Verteuil, R. L. (1958). Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J., 3, 155.Google Scholar
Lehmann, H. E. (1959). Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4, 1 supp. Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. (1934). J. Ment. Sci., 80, 277.Google Scholar
Leyberg, J. T. and Denmark, J. C. (1959). J. Ment. Sci., 105, 1123.Google Scholar
Mapother, E. (1926). Brit. Med. J., ii, 872.Google Scholar
Ostefeld, A. M. (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 24 supp. Google Scholar
Pressman, M. D. and Weiss, L. B. (1961). Am. J. Psychiat., 118, 74.Google Scholar
Rees, L. (1960). Nature, 186, 114.Google Scholar
Idem , Brown, A. C. and Benaim, S. (1961). J. Ment. Sci., 107, 552.Google Scholar
Rogerson, C. H. (1940). J. Ment. Sci., 86, 632.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1959). Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J., 4, 32 supp. Google Scholar
Rothman, I., Grayson, H. and Ferguson, J. (1961). J. Neuropsychiat., 2, 158.Google Scholar
Sargant, W. (1961). Brit. Med. J., i, 225.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sloane, R. B., Habib, A. and Batt, U. E. (1959). Canad. Med. Assoc. J., 80, 540.Google Scholar
Stoller, A. (1960). Med. J. Austral., 413.Google Scholar
Vaisberg, M. and Saunders, J. C. (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 334.Google Scholar
Vernier, V. G. (1961). Dis. Nerv. System, 22, 7 supp. Google Scholar
von Arnold, O. H. and Foitl, G. (1961). Wien. med. Wchnschr., 111, 272.Google Scholar
Zelcer, I. (1961). El Dia Medico, 33, 424.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.