Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:56:18.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly

VII. A new explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. B. Shapiro ,
J. Brierley ,
P. Slater  and
H. R. Beech
J. Brierley
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropathology
P. Slater
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology
H. R. Beech
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology The Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Previous papers in this series (Shapiro, 2, 3, 4; Shapiro and Tizard, 6; Yates, 13 and 16) have been concerned with the investigation of an aspect of the reproduction of designs called the rotation effect. Rotation is the term used to describe the fact that subjects often, when copying a design, make their reproductions in an orientation which is different from that of the model (see Figure 1).

Type
Physiological
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 108 , Issue 456 , September 1962 , pp. 655 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Campbell, D. (1957). “A study of some sensory motor functions.” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
2 Shapiro, M. B. (1951). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. I. Initial experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 97, 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Idem (1952). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. II. Confirmatory and explanatory experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 98, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Idem (1953). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. III. The testing of an explanatory theory”, J. Ment. Sci., 99, 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Idem (1956). “An experimental investigation of an anomaly in the performance of the Block Design Test”. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
6 Idem and Tizard, B. (1958). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. VI. The application of the “peephole” analogy to the perception of organic psychiatric patients”, J. Ment. Sci., 104, 792–800.Google Scholar
7 Idem , Kessell, R., and Maxwell, A. E. (1960). “Speed and quality of psychomotor performance in psychiatric patients”, J. Clin. Psychol. 16, 266–271.Google Scholar
8 Teuber, H. L. (1959). “Some alterations in behaviour after cerebral lesions in man. Evolution of nervous control”, Amer. Ass. Adv. Sc., 157–194.Google Scholar
9 Idem and Bender, M. (1949). “Alterations in pattern vision following trauma in the occipital lobes in man”, J. Gen. Psychol., 40, 36–57.Google Scholar
10 Idem and Mishkin, M. (1954). “Judgment of visual and postural vertical after brain injury”, J. of Psych., 38, 161–175.Google Scholar
11 Idem and Weinstein, S. (1956). “Ability to discover hidden figures after cerebral lesions”, A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 76, 369–377.Google Scholar
12 Williams, N. L., Lubin, A., Giesking, C., and Rubenstein, I. (1956). “An experimental study of block design rotation in brain injured and controls”, J. Consult. Psychol., 20, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Yates, A. J. (1954). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. IV. The effect of monocular vision on rotation”, J. Ment. Sci., 100, 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Idem (1954). “An experimental study of the block design rotation test with special reference to brain damage.” Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London.Google Scholar
15 Idem (1956). “The rotation of drawings by brain damaged patients”, J. Abn. and Soc. Psychol., 53, 175–181.Google Scholar
16 Idem (1956). “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. V. Some factors influencing the appearance of the block design rotation effect in normal subjects”, J. Ment. Sci., 102, 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.