Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:40:31.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hysteria—A Re-Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

W. Malcolm Millar
W. Malcolm Millar*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is interesting to reflect that it is 70 years since Charcot delivered his lectures on Hysteria at the Salpêtriére, 60 years since Freud and Breuer published their Studies in Hysteria and 50 years almost to the day that Pierre Janet was invited to lecture on the same subject at Harvard University. In that period—from Charcot to Janet—almost everything was said that could be said of this disease. So much so that we have entered into a sort of post-Galenic period in which all subsequent authors repeat—more briefly and less accurately—all that was said with such brilliance by this eminent triumvirate. What may be said that is new, really fresh? What researches of importance have been carried out in recent years that must today be reported, what up-to-date views on aetiology and treatment? It is humbling to admit that there are precious few. True there have been many contributions to other branches of psychiatry but it seems to me that the situation of the hysterical patient today is very much as it was when his grandparents and great-grandparents submitted themselves to the awesome scrutiny of a full neuro-psychiatric investigation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 436 , July 1958 , pp. 813 - 821
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, R. F., “Hysteria” in Modern Practice in Psychological Medicine (Rees, J. R., Ed.), 1949. London: Butterworth. p. 187.Google Scholar
Charcot, J. M., Diseases of the Nervous System, 1889. London: New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Cobb, S., Foundations of Neuropsychiatry, 1948. New York: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Curran, D., and Partridge, M., Psychological Medicine, 1955. Edinburgh, Livingstone.Google Scholar
Dicks, H. V., Clinical Studies in Psychopathology, 1939. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fenichel, O., Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, 1946. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. G., The Neurotic Personality, 1927. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Harrowes, W., Human Personality and its Minor Disorders, 1949. Edinburgh: Livingstone. p. 234.Google Scholar
Janet, J., Major Symptoms of Hysteria, 1907. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, W., “Psychoneuroses”, in Personality and Behaviour Disorders (Hunt, , Ronald, , Ed.). Vol. II. 1944. New York.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, , Euot, and Roth, , Martin, , Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., The Construction of Reality in the Child, 1954. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichard, S., “Re-examination of Studies in Hysteria“, Psychoanal. Quart., 1956, 25, No. 2, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegman, A. J., “Emotionability”, A Character Defence, ibid., 1954, 23, No. 3, 339.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.