Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:59:09.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Intellectual and Social Status of Children of Mental Defectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. W. G. Brandon
M. W. G. Brandon*
Affiliation:
The Fountain Hospital, London, S.W.17
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this survey was to assess the intellectual and social status of 150 children of 73 certified mental defectives. It is proposed to discuss the mothers in this paper and the children in a further one. The mothers in this group were all at one time patients at the Fountain Hospital. Much of the initial work was done by Mrs. L. Mundy, the Senior Psychologist, who had already tested most of the mothers, and Miss Kerry, the social worker, who had maintained contact with many of the discharged mothers and their children. One of the main factors which have made the research easier has been the general good feeling towards the Fountain felt by our ex-patients. They want the Fountain in general and the Physician Superintendent in particular to know how they are and what they are doing. Dr. Hilliard's “somewhatunorthodox procedure with difficult cases” (1956) and his views on feeblemindedness have now become fairly generally accepted. His view that many of these women can work successfully in the community has been substantiated already. It is hoped that this survey will help to avoid the inhuman and expensive administration process whereby an allegedly feebleminded mother is permanently separated from her child.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 433 , October 1957 , pp. 710 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. H., Wagner, E. A., and Strauss, A. A., “Children of our Children”, Am. J. ment. Defic., 1945, 49, 277.Google Scholar
Berry, and Gordon, , The Mental Defective, 1931. Kegan Paul. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugger, C., “Genealogical Enquiry into Feeblemindedness”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1930. Vol. 130. Quoted by Tredgold.Google Scholar
Burt, C., The Subnormal Mind, 1955. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. C., “Ability and Accomplishments by persons earlier judged Mentally Deficient”, Genet. psychol. monogr., 1953, 47.Google ScholarPubMed
Clarke, A. D. B., and Clarke, A. M., “Cognitive Changes in the Feebleminded”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 173.Google ScholarPubMed
Davenport, C. B., Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, 1911. New York: Henry Holt. Quoted by Davies and Williams, 1930.Google Scholar
Davies, and Williams, , Social Control of the Mentally Deficient, 1930. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Dayton, N. A., “Investigation of the Travelling School Clinics of the W. E. Fernald and Wrentham State Schools”, 1921-3. Quoted by Davies and Williams, 1930.Google Scholar
Downing, , Quoted in The Mental Defective, by Berry, and Gordon, , 1931. Kegan Paul, p. 126.Google Scholar
Earl, C. J. C., “A psychograph for Morons”, J. ab. soc. Psychol., 1940, 35, 428–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, W. E., “The Burden of Feeblemindedness”. Medical Communications Mass. Med. Soc., 1912, 33, Quoted in Davies and Williams, 1930, p. 92.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis, Hereditary Genius, 1892. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
Herd, H., The Chances of Morbid Inheritance, 1934, edited by Blacher, C. P. Quoted in Tredgold, p. 35.Google Scholar
Hilliard, L. T., “Discussion on Community Care of the Feebleminded”, Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1956.Google Scholar
Jones, D. C., Memorandum in the Report of the Departmental Committee on Sterilization, 1934.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. O., Report of the Departmental Committee on Sterilization, 1934.Google Scholar
Lokay, A., “The Relationship of Heredity and Imbecility”, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1929, 122. Mentioned in Tredgold, 1952.Google Scholar
Mental Deficiency Committee of the Surrey County Council, “Report on Sterilization”, 1926. Quoted by Davies and Williams, 1930.Google Scholar
Michelson, P., “The Feebleminded Parent, a study of 50 Family Cases”, Am. J. ment. Defic., 1947, 51, 644.Google Scholar
Morrells, V., “The Immediate Heredity of Primary Aments committed to a Public Institution”, A study of the Parents of 45 Cases at the New York City Children's Hospital, Randall's Island, 1924. Quoted in Lewis, 1934.Google Scholar
Mundy, L., M.Sc. thesis on Environmental Influence on Intellectual Functions as measured by Intelligence Tests, 1954.Google Scholar
Myerson, A., Proceedings of American Society for the Study of Feeblemindedness, 1930. Quoted by Davies and Williams, 1930.Google Scholar
Idem , “Clinical Consideration of Special Types”, J. Nerv. ment. Dis., 1927, 65, 512–516.Google Scholar
Neff, J. S., Laughun, S., and Cornell, W. S., “The Degenerate Children of Feebleminded Women”, Dept. of Public Health and Charities, Philadelphia, Pa., 1915, p. 4. Quoted by Davies and Williams.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S. (Colchester Survey), “A Clinical and Genetic Study of 1,280 Cases of Mental Defect”, 1938. Sp. Rep. Sen. Med. Counc., No. 229. H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
Idem , “Propagation of the Unfit”, Proceedings of the N. W. Met. Regional Mental Deficiency Society, 1950.Google Scholar
Idem, and Turner, F. D., Brit. med. J., 1934, i, 10.Google Scholar
Porteus, S. D., The Practice of Clinical Psychology, 1941. American Book Co. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, D., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1946, 1. The Year Book Publishing Inc. Google Scholar
Reiter, H., and Osthoff, H., Z. Hyg. InfekKr., 1921, 94, 1921. Quoted in Tredgold, 1952.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. A. F., Brit. J. Psychol., Stat. Sec. V., 1952.Google Scholar
Sayer, E., Eugenics Review, July, 1913, p. 162.Google Scholar
Shrubshall, F. C., and Williams, A. C., Mental Deficiency Practice, 1932. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Skeels, H. M., and Hanns, I., “Children with inferior social histories, their mental development in Adoptive Homes”, J. Genet. Psychol., 1948, 72, 283–294.Google ScholarPubMed
Stippich, M. E., “The Mental Development of Children of Feeble-Minded Mothers. A preliminary report”, Yearb. Nat. Soc. Stud. Educ., 1940, 39 (11) 337–350. Quoted in Carmichael's Child Psychology, 1954.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., and Merrill, M. A., Measuring Intelligence, 1947. Harrap.Google Scholar
Tizard, J., and O'Connor, N., “A Survey of patients in twelve Mental Deficiency Institutions”, Brit. med. J., 2 Jan., 1951, 16–18.Google Scholar
Tredgold, A. F., Mental Deficiency, 1929, 9, 496. Revision 5th Ed. Google Scholar
Idem , A text book of Mental Deficiency, 1952. 8th Ed. Google Scholar
Vanuxem, M., Proc. of American Assoc. for study of Feebleminded, 1931. Quoted in Tredgold, 1952.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944. Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, M. A., Am. J. ment. Defic., 1945, 50, 259.Google Scholar
Wildenskov, H. O., Investigations into the causes of Mental Deficiency, 1934. London: Humphrey Milford. Mentioned in Penrose, 1952 and Tredgold, 1952.Google Scholar
Williams, A. C., Lancet, 1930, ii, 1026.Google Scholar
Woodall, C. S., Proc. of American Assoc. for study of Feebleminded, 1932, 328. Quoted by Tredgold, 1952.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.