Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:28:04.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Validity of the Rorschach Test in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Damage and Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. Walton
D. Walton*
Affiliation:
Rainhill Hospital, near Liverpool and Winwick Hospital, Warrington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Introduction Since the publication of Rorschach's Form Interpretation Test in 1921, its applications have been extended to cover an increasing number of clinico-psychological problems. Of these, one of the most important and difficult is the diagnosis of organic brain damage and pathology.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 101 , Issue 423 , April 1955 , pp. 370 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“Anglo-American Symposium on Psychosurgery, Neurophysiology and Physical Treatments in Psychiatry”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., Sect. Psychiatry, 1949, Suppl. 42, Pp. 95.Google Scholar
Brickner, R. M., Res. Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1934, 13, 259.Google Scholar
Idem, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1939, 41, 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diers, W. C., and Brown, C. C., J. Consult. Psychol., 1951, 15.Google Scholar
Dorken, H., and Kral, V. A., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1951, 108, 2, No. 10.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem, The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
German, W. J., and Fox, J. C., Res. Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1934, 13, 378.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., J. Neurol. Psychopathol., 1936, 17, 27.Google Scholar
Idem, Language and Language Disturbances, 1948. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem and Scheerer, M., Psychol. Man., 1941, No. 239.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, M., Arnot, R., and Solomon, H. C., Studies in Lobotomy, 1950, Pp. 495. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Halstead, Ward C., “Brain and Intelligence” in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behaviour, The Hixon Symposium, 1951. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Harrower-Erickson, M. R., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1940a, 43, 859–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1940b, 43, 1081–1107.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O., J. Gen. Psychol., 1939, 21, 73.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1941, 25, 257.Google Scholar
Idem, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1945, 54, 10.Google Scholar
Idem , “Animal and Physiological Psychology”, in Annual Review of Psychol., 1950, 1.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, H. T., Brit. J. Psychol., 1946, 36, 132–144.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. M., J. Proj. Tech., 1948, 12, 165–167.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., and Kelley, D. M., The Rorschach Technique, 1942. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar
Koskoff, Y. D., Dennis, W., Lazovik, D., and Wheeler, E. T., Research Publ. Assoc. Research Nervous Mental Disease, 1942, 27, 723–53.Google Scholar
Lidz, T., J. Neurol. Psychiat., 1939, 2, 211.Google Scholar
Lord, Edith E., Psychological Monogr., 1950, 65, 1–34.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1947, 103, 780–784.Google Scholar
Mettler, F. A., Ed., Selective Partial Ablation of the Frontal Cortex, 1949, Pp. 517. New York: Paul B. Holber.Google Scholar
Meyers, V., and Yates, A. J., 1954. To appear.Google Scholar
Miller, D. R., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 378–387.Google Scholar
Nadel, A., Arch. Psychol., New York, 1938, 224, 60.Google Scholar
Neff, W. S., and Lidz, T., J. Proj. Tech., 1951, 15, No. 1, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, I. C., and Hunt, J. McV., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 96, 1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberholzer, E., “Zur Differentialdiagnose Psychischer Folgezustände nach Schädeltraumen Mittels des Rorschachschen Formdeuteversuchs”, Z. Ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1931, 136, 569–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, M., Prefrontal Leucotomy, 1950, Pp. 496. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Evans, J., Res. Publ. Ass. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1934, 13, 352.Google Scholar
Idem, Brain, 1935, 58, 115.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Rasmussen, T., The Cerebral Cortex of Man, 1950, Pp. 248. New York: The Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, Z. A., Rorschach Res. Exch., 1936–1937, 1, 23–40. Also in Kwart. Psychol., 1937, 9, 29–41.Google Scholar
Idem, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1937, 86, 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porteus, S. D., The Porteus Maze Test and Intelligence, 1951, Pp. 194. Palo Alto. Calif., Pacific Books.Google Scholar
Rorschach, H., Psychodiagnostik: Methodik und Ergebnisse eines ∗∗∗Wahrnemungsdiagnostischen Experiments: Deutenlassen von Zufallsformen. 1st ed., Ernst Bircher, Bern; 1921, Pp. 174. 2nd ed., Huber, Bern, 1932, Pp. 227. 3rd ed., Huber, Bern, 1937, Pp. 255. 4th ed., Huber, Bern, 1941, Pp. 277.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D., J. Ment. Sci., 1941, 87, 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Ross, S., J. Proj. Tech. (R.R.E.), 1944, 8.Google Scholar
Rylander, G., Acta. Psychiat. Neurol., 1939, Suppl. No. 20.Google Scholar
U.S. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Report, Guildford, J. P., editor. Printed classification test. Report No. 5. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1947, Chapter 24, Clinical Type Procedures.Google Scholar
Yacorzynski, G. K., Boshes, B., and Davis, L., Research Pubs. Assoc. Research Nervous Mental Disease, 1948, 27, 642–57.Google Scholar
Zubin, J., “Abnormalities of Behaviour”, in Annual Review of Psychol., 1952, 3.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.