No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2018
I have no intention of tracing the history of tuberculosis in asylums through the official obscurity of the past fifty years. This point has already received careful investigation at the hands of Dr. Crookshank in the admirable essay he has recently published; nor are we here concerned with any comparison between the mortality from tubercle among asylum inmates and the mortality from tubercle among the general population, inasmuch as deductions drawn therefrom are liable, among other errors, to those fallacies which occur when two communities whose environment and susceptibility differ are compared as regards the mortality of any particular disease.
(1) Journ. Meni. Sci., October, 1899.—Google Scholar
(2) City of Manchester M.O.H.'s Annual Report for 1898.—Google Scholar
(3) City of Sheffield, Special Report by M.O.H. on the Prevalence of Tuberculosis, 1899.—Google Scholar
(4) Journ. Meni. Sci., October, 1897.—Google Scholar
(5) Brit. Med. Journ., September 23rd, 1893.—Google Scholar
(6) Deut. med. Woch., April, 1897.—Google Scholar
(7) Brit. Med. Journ., 1898, vol. ii, p. 77.—Google Scholar
(8) Ibid., 1898, vol. ii, p. 495.—Google Scholar
(9) Trans. Assoc. American Physicians, 1897.—Google Scholar
(10) Boston Med. and Surg. Journ., 1897.—Google Scholar
(11) American Journ. Insanity, January, 1899.—Google Scholar
(12) Brit. Med. Journ., 1898, vol. i, p. 357.—Google Scholar
(13) Ibid., 1899, vol. i, p. 1348.—Google Scholar
(14) Ibid., 1899, vol. ii, p. 1153.—Google Scholar
(15) “The Prevention of Phthisis in the Insane,” Archives of Neurology, from the Pathological Laboratory of the London County Asylums, 1899.—Google Scholar
(16) Vide paper by Dr. A. Ransome on the “Open-air Treatment of Consumption,” Brit. Med. Journ., 1898, vol. ii, p. 69.Google Scholar
* These figures do not include io doubtful cases.Google Scholar
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.