Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:35:10.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical Signs, Diagnosis and Prognosis in the Functional Psychoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Arthur Harris
Affiliation:
Bethlem Royal Hospital and The Maudsley Hospital
Vera Norris
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, Maudsley Hospital

Extract

In a previous enquiry the prognostic significance of diverse aspects of the functional psychoses was examined (Harris and Lubin, 1952; Harris and Norris, in press). Prognosis was evaluated in terms of total length of stay in a mental hospital over a follow-up period of 18 years. Each patient was assigned to one of three major diagnostic groups (schizophrenia, affective psychosis or atypical psychosis), the diagnosis being based on Kraepelinian and Bleulerian criteria. The diagnosis was made by one of the authors (A.H.) on the evidence of 20-year-old case notes written by a large number of different psychiatrists. In this investigation the same author himself examined all the patients included in the series. We felt it would be interesting to compare the predictive value of diagnoses made by the rough and ready method of the earlier survey with that of those made by a detailed examination of the patients concerned, as in the present survey. For reasons previously stated (Harris and Norris, 1954) we feel that only certified patients admitted in the second period are comparable with the types of cases admitted in 1930. If a diagnosis of schizophrenia is held to connote an unfavourable and the remaining categories a favourable outcome then in the first series 60 per cent. of the patients were correctly classified while in the second series 58 per cent. of the certified patients were assigned to their correct diagnostic group. This difference is not significant. Thus it would appear that a more sophisticated application of Bleulerian methods of diagnosis does not necessarily give rise to more reliable evaluation of prognosis. Accordingly we have attempted to dissect these three diagnostic categories to determine whether any of the components show prognostic significance. For this purpose we took the second series because for these patients there were available detailed clinical descriptions made by one of the authors (A.H.) in the observation ward of a general hospital, prior to the patient's transfer to a mental hospital. Unfortunately 13 of the case notes containing these detailed clinical descriptions had been lost, so that we could only use 187 patients out of the total of 200. They were first admitted to hospital in the period May, 1940 to May, 1942 and were followed-up for the next 10 years. The result of the analysis is set out in the table.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1954 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albee, G. W., “The Prognostic Importance of Delusions in Schizophrenia”, J. Abnorm. and Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 208.Google Scholar
Grauer, D., “Prognosis in Paranoid Schizophrenia on the Basis of the Rorschach”, J. Consulting Psychol., 1953, 17, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A., “Cardiazol Treatment of Schizophrenia”, J. Ment. Sci., 1938, 84, 735.Google Scholar
Idem , and Lubin, A., “The Prognosis of the Functional Psychoses”, Monatsschr. für Psychiat. u Neurol., 1952, 124, 126.Google Scholar
Idem , and Norris, V., “Expectation of Life and Liberty in the Functional Psychoses”, Psychiat. Quart. In press.Google Scholar
Idem , “Changes in Duration of Stay of Mental Hospital Patients Suffering from Functional Psychoses during the Past 20 Years”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 241.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G., The Schizophreniform States, 1939. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malmo, R. B., Shagass, C., and Smith, A. A., “Responsiveness in Chronic Schizophrenia”, J. of Personality, 1951, 19, 359.Google Scholar
Pascal, G. R., and Swenson, C., “Learning in Mentally Ill Patients under Conditions of Unusual Motivation”, J.of Personality, 1952, 21, 240.Google Scholar
Skottowe, I., “Shock Therapy: A Plea for Proportion in Psychiatry”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1939, 32, 842.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.