Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:52:28.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Occasional Notes of the Quarter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 26 , Issue 113 , April 1880 , pp. 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 1880 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

∗ It is true that if the recoveries in the three classes of asylums are compared, the result without an explanation is confessedly not particularly favourable to private asylums. Thus during 19 years (1859 to 1877 inclusive) the cures were for County and Borough Asylums, 35·38 per cent. (of admissions); Registered Hospitals, 37·99; Metropolitan Private Asylums, 27·27; Provincial Private Asylums, 31·21; Private Single patients, 9·43. But Mr. Newington's reply to these figures would be that the proprietors of Private Asylums are practically debarred from their full share of cures by the late arrival of patients.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.