No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2018
This connection may result—
1st. From the presence of symptoms which resemble, or are identical with, those which we recognise as expressions of the physiological function of the sympathetic, and which we have enumerated and explained in the former part of this essay.
2ndly. From pathological anatomical changes in the sym pathetic nerve.
Those conditions usually go together, but not invariably; thus, the pathological alterations may be completely wanting, or, on the other hand, they may be found in cases which were not before suspected to have any connection with the sympa thetic system.
We begin with the consideration of the affections of the cervical sympathetic, afterwards taking up those which pro bably have relation to some change in the thoracic and abdominal portions of that nerve.
* It should be stated that it was for this Essay that the Astley Cooper Prize for 1877 was originally awarded to Dre. E Ulenburg and Guttmann—a decision, however, which was subsequently overthrown on the technical ground that the paper was the work of two authors, and not of one only—as the terms of Sir A. Cooper's will seem to require. This essay having been handed in in October, 1876) there are no references to any papers on the subject written since then. Google Scholar
* In Poiteau'e comparative observations (“Archiv, gen. de Med,” 1869, Août) there are nineteen cases of paralysis and nine of irritation of the cervical svmpathetic. Google Scholar
‡ Willebrandt, “Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1865, Bd. I., p. 319. Google Scholar
• Ogle, “Medico-Chirurgi cal Transactions,” T. zìi., p. 398. Google Scholar
§ Heineke, “Greifswalder med. Beiträge,” I860, Bd. ii. Google Scholar
‖ Verneuil, Gax. des hôpitaux, “1864, 16 Aprel. 1 Ogle,” Lancet,” 17 April, 1869. Google Scholar
‡ Du Moulin, “Bullet, de la Soo. do Méd. de Gand.,” 1872. I Fränkel, “Berliner klinische Wochenschrift,” 1875, No. 3. § Ogle, 44 Med. Chir. Transactions,” T. xli., p. 398. Google Scholar
• Demme, “Würzburger med. Zeitschrift,“1862, Bd. iii., p. 262 and 269. t Vulpian,” Leçons sur l'appareil vasomoteur.” Paris, 1875, p. 142. Google Scholar
♦ S. Weir Mitchell, George Β. Morehouse, and William Keen—“Gunshot Wounds and other Injuries of Nerves.” Philadelphia, 1864. Google Scholar
• Kämpf, Sitzung der Κ. K. Gesellschaft der Aerzte in Wienarn, 8 März· 1872. Google Scholar
‡ Seeligmüller, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No 4. Google Scholar
• Nicati, “La Paralysie da nerf sympathique cervical.” Lausanne, 1873. t Bernhardt, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No. 47 and 48. Google Scholar
* Seeligmüller, “Archiv, für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten,” 1875, Bd. v., p. 835. Google Scholar
• Bendu, dee troubles fonctionels du grand sympathique, observés dans lee plaies de la Moëlle cervicale. “Arohiv. gen. de méd.,” 1869, Sept., p. 286-297. Google Scholar
* Hutchinson,” Lancet/' 1875, 21 and 29 May. Google Scholar
‡ M. Rosenthal, “Oesterr. Zeitschiift für pract. Heilkunde/1860, No. 46. t Bäerwinkel,” Archiv, für kl in. Medicin/' Band xiv., p. 545. Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, “Med. Times and Gaz.” 1868, p. 584. Google Scholar
‡ Seeligmüller, “Ueber Sympathicus-Affectionen bei Verletzung des Plexus brachialis,” Beri. klin. Wochenschrift, 1870, No. 26. Google Scholar
* Báerwinkel, “Zur Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Deutsches Arohiv. für klinische Medicin. Bd. xiv., p. 646. Google Scholar
* Nitzeinadel, “Ueber nervöse Hyperidrosis und Anidrosis,” Jena, 1867, Inang. Dissert. Google Scholar
• Meschede, “Virchow's Arohiv.” Bd. xliii., p. 139. Google Scholar
‡ Berger, “Virchow's Archiv,” li., p. 427. Google Scholar
• Wiegemeister, “Virchow's Archiv:” Bd Iii., p. 437. Google Scholar
§ Otto, “Archiv, für klin. Medicin.” Band xl, Heft & H Nitzeinadel, L. o. Google Scholar
% Bäerwinkel, “Archiv, für klin. Medicin,” 1874. Bd. xiv., p. 550. Google Scholar
** Külz, “Beiträge Znr Pathologie nnd Therapie des Diabetes,” 1874, pp. 23 and 27. Google Scholar
++ Chvostek, “Wiener med. Wochenshrift,” 1872. No. 19 and 20. ÎX Pokroffsky, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1875. No. 13. %% Seguin, “American Journal of Medical Soienoee,” Oct., 1872. Google Scholar
* Ebstein,” Virchow's Archiv.,'» 1876. Bd.lxii, p. 435. Google Scholar
* Da Bois-Rey mond, “Zar Kenntaiss der Hemikranie, Archiv, für Anat. und Phye.,” I860, p. 461-468. Google Scholar
* Brnnner, “Zar Casuistik der Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Petersburger med. Zeitschrift, N. T. Bd. ii., 1871, p. 260. Google Scholar
• Berger, “Zur Pathogenese der Hemicranie.” Virchow's Archiv, lix., Heft 3 and 4, 1874. Google Scholar
• Brown-Séquard, “De rhemicranie on migraine, par le Dr. dn Bois-Reymond,” Journal de Phye. 1861. Google Scholar
‡ Althann,” Beiträge zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Circulation” Dor-pat, 1871· Google Scholar
* Möllendorff, 4< Ueber Hemicranie,“YirchoVa”Archiv, für path. Anat.” Bd. zìi, p. 885-395. Google Scholar
♦ Hermann mid Escher, Pflüger's “Archiv, für Physiologie,“1870, p. 3. t Landois,” Centralblatt für die med. Wissensch.,” 1865. No. 44; 1867, No. 10. Google Scholar
• Bernatzik, “Wiener med. Presse,” 1867. No. 28. Google Scholar
‡ “British Med. Journal,” 1868, vol. ii., p. 360. Google Scholar
* Berger, “Das Amylnitrit, ein nenes Palliativmittel bei Hemikranie,” Berliner klin. Wochenschrift, 1867. No. 2. Google Scholar
* Holet, “Ueber das Wesen der Hemikranie und ihre electro-therapeutische Behandlung nach der polarne Methode.” Dorpater med. Zeitschrift, 1871. Bd. ii, p. 261-228. t “Wiener med. Presse,” 1865, No. 46, p. 1123. Google Scholar
* Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie.” Wien, 1868. Google Scholar
‡ Trommhold, “Die Migraine und ihre Heilung durch Electricität.” Pest, 1868. Google Scholar
• Fieber, “Compendium der Elektrotherapie.” Wien, 1869, p. 120. § M. Rosenthal, 41 Handbuch der Diagnostik und Therapie der Nervenkrankheiten,” Erlangen, 1870. Google Scholar
‖ Althaus,44 Treatise on Medical Electricity,” 3rd edition. London, 1873. % Hoist, I.e., p. 275. Google Scholar
* Horner,u Ueber eine Form von Ptosis.“Klin. Monatsbl. für Augenheilkonde. 1869, vii., p. 193; Nicati,” La paralysie du nerf sympathique cervical,” 1873. Google Scholar
‡ Bäerwinkel, “Archiv, für klinisohe Medicin.” 1874, Bd. xiv., p. 649. Google Scholar
• Schmid t-Rimpler, “Klin Monatsbl. für Augenheilkunde,” xii., p. 398. Google Scholar
§ “Handbuch der Ophthalmologie,” Bd. v. (1875), p. 98 and 99 (Capitel “ülaucom”). Google Scholar
‖ Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie.” Wien. 1868, p. 253 it Google Scholar
* ν, Gräfe, “Ueber Neuroretini tis,” Archiv fiir Ophthalmologie, 1866. Bd. »i.» ρ 114. Google Scholar
‡ Η Schmidt, “Zur Enstehung der Stauungspapille bei Hirnleiden.” Archiv, für Ophthalmologie, 1869. Bd. xv., ρ 193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
• Seeeman (Archiv, für Anat. und Phys 1869, ρ 164) showed that compression of the cavernous sinus is not followed, as v. Gräfe believed, by great engorgement in the retinal veins, as the return of blood, by direct communication with the superficial veins of the face, is quite free enough. Google Scholar
* “Gräfe's und Walther β Journal,” xxix. 1840, ρ 649. Google Scholar
‡ “Nerven lehre,” ρ 570. Google Scholar
* Bränner, “Zur Casuistik der Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Petersburger med. Zeitschrift, N. F. Bd. ii„ 1871, p. 260. Google Scholar
* Bell, “Physiologische und pathologische Untersuchungendes Nerven-système”;” übersetzt von Bomberg, Berlin, 1832. t L.C., p. 364. Google Scholar
• “Niederl. Lancet,” Sept. und Okt., 1854, p. 218. See Schmidt's “Jahrbücher,” 1855; 87t«· Band, p. 179 Google Scholar
* Jaccoud, “Bulletin de” la soo. méd. des hôpitaux de Paris Union méd. 1865 (T. XXV.), No. 4, p. 60. See aleo “Leçons de clinique médicale,” p. 861. Google Scholar
• 14 Archiv, de Phys. normale et pathologique,“I. Sér., 1874, p. 889. t Bemak, <4 Oeeterr. Zeitschrift für practische Heilkunde,” 1862, p. 1 and 29. See also 44 Application du courant constant au traitement des névroses,“Paris, 1865, p. 26. £ Bemak,” Application du courant constant,” p. 28. Google Scholar
* M. Meyer, “Die Elektrioität in ihrer Anwendung auf praefcische Medioin.1 S*® Auflage,” 1868, p. 219. Google Scholar
‡ Driesen, quoted in above book, p. 219. Google Scholar
• Fieber, “Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1866, No. 25, p. 261 (ix. Versuch). Google Scholar
§ Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie,” ii. Abth. (Wien, 1866), p. 389. II” Ibidem/1 p. 389-412. Google Scholar
τ Erb, “Arch.für klin. Medicin,” 1867, iii. Band, p. 356. Google Scholar
* Bäerwinkel,” Prager Vierfceljahrschrift für pracfc Heilkunde/' 1858, lix., p. 133. Google Scholar
‡ Voisin, “Gaz. hebd.,» 1863, No. 37;” Gaz. des hôp.,“1863, No. 110, p. 437. X Menjeand,” Gaz. des hôp.,” 18C6, No. 3, p. 10. Google Scholar
* L.O. Google Scholar
• Nesemann, “Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1868, No. 37. Google Scholar
* Spielmann, “Gaz. méd. de Strasbourg,” 1862. Mai, No. 5, p. 85 ff. Google Scholar
‡ Duchenne, “Electrisation localisée.” 2 edit., 1861, p. 334. Google Scholar
• Stoffella, “Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft der Aertzte,” in Wein, 1865, Heft. 1, p. 85 ff. Google Scholar
§ Griesinger, “Archiv, der Heilkunde,“1864 (6ter Jahrgang;, p. 171. II Benedikt,”Elektrotherapie,“Wien, 1869, p. 186ff. % Menjon,”Med. Chir. Transactions,“Vol. liii., 1852, p. 73 ff. See also Seidel,”Die Atrophia musculorumlipomatosa.“Jena. 1867, p. 64. »* Eulenburg,” Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1865. No. 50; ibidem 1866, No. 37. Google Scholar
‡‡ Barth, “Archiv, der Heilkunde,” 1871, Bd, xii., p. 121. Google Scholar
•• Chvostek, “Oesterr. Zeitschrift für practische Heilkunde,” 1871. No 38-40. Google Scholar
• Berger, “Deutsches Archiv, für klin. Medicin,” 1872. Band ix., p. 363. t Casper's “Wochenschrift,” 1840. No. 13 and 14. Google Scholar
• “De exophthalmo a struma cam cordis affectione.” Inaagarai Dissert., Berlin, 1855. Google Scholar
‡ “Gaz. hebdom.,” 1860. No. 49. Google Scholar
% “Gaz. Med.,” 1862, p. 474. Google Scholar
§ Naamann, 11 Deatsche Klinik,“1863. No. 24. F. Banks,” Dublin Hosp. Gaz,“1855, No. 9. Fournier et OUivier,” Union Méd.,” 1868, p. 95. Google Scholar
* “Du goitre exophthalmique chez les animaux domestiques.” Comtes ren. dus, 1862. Tome lv., p. 475. See also Virchow,”Die krankhaften Geschwülste/' 1867, Bd. iii., p. 57. Google Scholar
‡ “Extrait du Bulletin de la Soc. de Méd. de Gant.,” 1872. Google Scholar
% “Berliner klinische Wochenschrift,” 1805. No. 27. Google Scholar
§ See Trousseau, “Clinique méd./' T. ii*, p. 540. H” Lancet/' 1869. No. 25. ΐ “Gaz. méd.,” 1856, p. 600. Google Scholar
·· « De Morbo Basedowii.” Inaug. Dissert., Berlin, 1863, p. 27. Google Scholar
• Such cases have been observed by Mackenzie, quoted by Fischer, “Archives générales de Méd.,M 1859, p. 652; by Förster, quoted by Lebert,” die Krankheiten der Schilddrüse und ihre Behandlung,11 Breslau, 1862, p. 309; by Schnitzler, “Wiener, Medicinal-Halle,” 1864, No. 27; by Chisholm, “Med. Times and Gaz.,'* 1871, No. 1 : by Emmert,”Archiv, für Ophthalmogie,” 187J, Bd. xvii., p. 218. Google Scholar
» v. Gräfe, “Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1857, p. 292. t “Traité dee Tumeurs de l'orbite.” Paris, 1860, p. 157-223. χ Basedow, 44 Casper s Wochenschrift,“1848, p. 775; Heusinger, *· Casper's Wochenschrift,” 1851, p. 52; Brück, “Deutsche Klinik,“1862, p. 207; Naumann,” Deutsche Klinik,“1853, p. 269; Laqueur,” De Morbo Basedowii,“Inaug. Dies., Berlin, 1860, p. 12; v. Becklinghausen,”Deutsche Klinik,“1863. p. 288; Peter,”Gaz. hebdom,“1864, p. 181; Fournier et Ollivier,” Union méd.,” 1868, p. 95. Google Scholar
§ “Deutsche Klinik,“1864,p. 158; and”Berliner klinische Wochensohrift,” 1867, No 81. Google Scholar
* Basedow, “Casper's Wochenschrift,“1840, p. 222; Praël,”Archiv, für Opthalmologie,“1857, Bd. iii, p. 201; Naumann, loco citato, p. 286; Gräfe,”Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,“1857, p. 285; and”Berliner klin. Wochen, schrift,” 1867, No. 31. Google Scholar
‡ Lavrence, “Gaz. des hòp.” 1858, p. 198; Tatnm, “Med. Times and Gaz./' 1864, 23 January, p. 89; Teissier,”Canstatt's Jahresbericht,“1864, Bd. iv., ρ 173; Patchett,” Lancet,” 1872, Juno 15. Google Scholar
* Bomberg and Henoch, “Klinische Wahrnehmungen und Beobachtungen,” Berlin, 1861, p. 182; Beith, “Med. Times and Gaz.,” 1865, p. 621; Friedrich, “Lehrbuch der Herzkrankheiten,” Erlangen, 1867, p. 312, Trousseau, “Clinique méd.,” Paris, 1868, Tome ii., p. 636; Fournier et Ollivier, “Union med.,” 1869, p. 93; Gildemeester, “Archiv, für die holländischen Beitrage zur Natur und Heilkunde,” Utrecht, 1864, Bd. III., p. 416 and 420; Cheadle, ·'Lancet,“1869, No. 25; Emmert,”Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1871, Bd. xvii, ρ 203 Google Scholar
• “Notes, pour servir à l'histoire du goitre exophthalmique,” Gaz. hebdom., 1864, No. 12, p. 180. Google Scholar
‡ Reith, “Exophthalmos—Enlargement of Thyroid Gland—Affection of Cervical Sympathetic,” “Med. Times and Gaz.,” 11 Novr., 1865, p. 521. Google Scholar
• William Moore, “Some remarks on the Nature and Treatment of Pulsating Thyroid Gland, with Exophthalmos, '” Dubl. Quar. Jour, of Med. Science,” 1865, p. 344-352. Google Scholar
* Traube and v. Recklinghausen, “Deutsche Klinik,” 1863, No. 29, p. 286. t This case was communicated to us by letter. X Virchow, “Die krankhaften Geschwülste,” Bd. iii., p. 81. § Geigel, “Würzborger med. Zeitschrift,” 1866, Bd. yii., p. 84. II Knight, “Bostcn Med. and Surg. Journal,” 1868, 19 April. % Ganghofner,11 Prager Vierteljahrschrift,” 1876, Bd. cxxx. Google Scholar
• Paul, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,“1856, No. 27. t Fournier et Ollivier,” Union mèd.,“1868, No. 8 and 9. t Babejac,” Du goitre exophthalmique,“Thèse, Paris, 1869. $ Wilks,” Guy's Hosp. Keports,” 1870, Bd. xv., p. 17 ff. Google Scholar
• Chvostek, “Wienermed. Presse,“1869, No. 19; 1871,No.41; 1872,No.23. t M Meyer,” Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No. 39. Google Scholar
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.