Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:39:52.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric Aspects of Homosexuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

T. G. Grygier
T. G. Grygier*
Affiliation:
Banstead Hospital, Sutton, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 432 , July 1957 , pp. 514 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, A. J., Mathis, J. K., and Powers, C., J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 185—88.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., Rorschach Test: II. A Variety of Personality Pictures, 1949. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem , Rabin, A. I., Thiesen, W. G., Molish, H., and Thetford, W. N., J. Psychol., 1950, 30, 241—98.Google Scholar
Bellak, L., and Bellak, S. S., A Children's Apperception Test, 1949. New York: C.P.S. Co.Google Scholar
Idem , Ekstein, R., and Braverman, S., Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, 271.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. S., Bull. Menninger Clin., 1945, 9, 78—83.Google Scholar
Blum, G. S., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 39, 3—99.Google Scholar
Idem , The Blacky Pictures: a Technique for the Exploration of Personality Dynamics, 1950. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Blum, R. H., J. clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 120—25.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borstelmann, L. J., and Klopfer, W. G., J. Person., 1951, 19, 421—39.Google Scholar
Burton, A., J. Psychol., 1947, 24, 161—64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, A. W., J. clin. Psychol., 1946a, 2, 240—47.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1946b, 2, 357—63.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1947, 3, 65—74.Google Scholar
Cook, E. B., and Wherry, R. J., J. appl. Psychol., 1950, 34, 260—66.Google Scholar
Davids, A., Joelson, M., and McArthur, C., J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 161—72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darke, R. A., and Geil, G. A., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1948, 108, 217—40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deri, S. K., Introduction to the Szondi Test: Theory and Practice, 1949a. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem , Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1949b, 19, 447—54.Google Scholar
Due, F. O., and Wright, M. E., Rorschach Res. Exch., 1945, 9, 169—77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, L. D., and Gurvitz, M. S., Amer. Psychologist, 1954, 9, 363.Google Scholar
Felzer, S. B., J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 382—86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromm, E. O., and Elonen, A. S., J. proj. Tech., 1951, 15, 185—230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, J., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1956, 123, 292—95.Google Scholar
Glover, E., Psycho-Analysis: a Handbook for Medical Practitioners and Students of Comparative Psychology, 1949. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, F. L., Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings, 1926. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Idem , Science, 1946, 104, 451—56.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., J. clin. Psychol., 1946, 2, 23—37.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1952, 12, 427—39.Google Scholar
Grygier, P., Internat. J. soc. Psychiat., 1956, 2, 105—112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grygier, T., Oppression - a Study in Social and Criminal Psychology, 1954. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , The Dynamic Personality Inventory, 1955. Sutton: Banstead Hospital Management Committee.Google Scholar
Idem , Bull. Brit. psychol. Soc., 1955, No. 26.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., and Martin, H. G., An Inventory of Factors GAMIN, 1943. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sheridan Supply Co.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., and Zimmerman, W. S., Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 70 (No. 10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, G. M., J. Psychol., 1950, 30, 317—23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, R., Char. and Person., 1940, 9, 122—33.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C., The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 1943. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Henry, W. E., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 35, 1—134.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., et al., Developments in the Rorschach Technique, 1956(?). London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Idem , Ainsworth, M. D., Klopfer, W. G., and Holt, R. R., Developments in the Rorschach Technique: Technique and Theory, 1954. New York: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Idem, and Kelley, D. McG., The Rorschach Technique: a Manual for a Projective Method of Personality Diagnosis, 1946. New York: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Klopfer, W. G., and Borstelmann, L. J., J. Person., 1951, 19, 172—88.Google Scholar
Krout, M. H., and Krout, J., Personal Preference Scale, 1951. Chicago: The Chicago Psychological Institute.Google Scholar
Idem, and Krout Tabin, J., Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1954, 50, 289—335.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J., Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1955, 15, 3—17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubin, A., and Malloy, M., J. abnorm, soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 480—84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machover, K., Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure, 1949. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Mainord, F. R., J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 188—89.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C. D., and Murray, H. A., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1935, 34, 289—306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem, in Murray, H. A., et al., Explorations in Personality, 1938. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 530—45.Google Scholar
Morris, W. W., Amer. Psychologist, 1946, 1, 264.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A., J. Psychol., 1937, 3, 115—43.Google Scholar
Idem , et al., Thematic Apperception Test Manual, 1943. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Newcombe, T. M., Hum. Relat., 1947, 1, 69—86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsche, C. J., Robinson, J. F., and Parsons, E. T., J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L., and Smith, J. G., Rorschach Interpretation: Advanced Technique, 1953. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Phillipson, H., The Object Relations Technique, 1955. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Rapaport, D., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1946. Chicago: The Year Book Publ.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, S., J. Person., 1949, 17, 475—82.Google Scholar
Idem and Fleming, e. e., J. Person., 1949, 17, 483—503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B., Char. and Person., 1940, 9, 18—34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , J. Person., 1948, 16, 304—11.Google Scholar
Schafer, R., The Clinical Application of Psychological Tests, 1948. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Idem , Psychoanalytic Interpretation in Rorschach Testing: Theory and Application, 1954. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Scheidlinger, S., Psychoanalysis and Group Behaviour: a Study of Freudian Group Psychology, 1952. New York: W. W.” Norton.Google Scholar
Shneidman, E. S., Make a Picture Story Test, 1948. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Idem , Thematic Test Analysis, 1951. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Idem , Projective Techniques Monographs, 1952, No. 2.Google Scholar
Shorr, J. E., J. clin. Psychol., 1948, 4, 189—94.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipprelle, C. N., and Swensen, C. H., J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 197—98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, H. L., J. clin. Psychol., 1947, 3, 293 98.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, E., and Slater, P., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1947, 21, 61—74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, P., The Selective Vocabulary Test, 1944. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Strong, E. K. Jr., J. soc. Psychol., 1936, 7, 49—67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symonds, P. M., Symonds Picture-Story Test, 1948. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M., and Buttenwieser, P., J. soc. Psychol., 1935, 6, 143–71; 267-89.Google Scholar
Idem , and Miles, C. C., Attitude-Interest Analysis Test, 1936. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Idem , Sex and Personality, 1936. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L., J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1948, 43, 471—75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, S. S., Psychol. Bull., 1942, 39, 490.Google Scholar
Idem , The Thematic Apperception Test: the Theory and Technique of Interpretation, 1947. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
Twitchell-Allen, D., Amer. Psychologist, 1947, 2, 271—72.Google Scholar
Tyler, F. T., J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 451—456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. E., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1935, 15, 199—217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. M., Rorschach Res. Exch., 1949, 13, 97—126.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M., Little, K. B., and Lehner, G. F. J., J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 134—41.Google Scholar
White, R. W., J. Psychol., 1937a, 3, 265—77.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1937b, 3, 279—89.Google Scholar
Wittenborn, J. R., J. clin. Psychol., 1949, 5, 157—61.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, F., J. Person., 1948, 17, 169—76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.