Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:37:17.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Reaction of the Urine in 120 Cases of Mental Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

James Walker*
Affiliation:
Laboratories of the Cardiff City Mental Hospital

Extract

Two methods are available to determine the reaction of a fluid. The first is the method of titration for acidity or alkalinity, in which a standard solution of acid or alkali is added until a certain change in the colour of a suitable indicator is detected. The second method is to determine the hydrogen-ion concentration present in the fluid. The latter is the only satisfactory method of measuring the reaction of a fluid. The hydrogen-ion concentration expresses the reaction of neutral, acid and alkaline solutions. The electrical is the standard method, but for clinical purposes is too intricate. The colorimetric method is less complicated. It is based upon the fact that each indicator has a characteristic zone of hydrogen-ion concentrations within which its colour changes occur. For details as to the theory and technique of this method, the reader may be referred to Clarke and Lubs (J. Bacteriol., 1917, ii), and Cole (Practical Physiological Chem., pp. 19–30).

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1923 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Arch. Int. Med., vol. xii, p. 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Ditto, (clinical studies of acid base equilibrium and the nature of acidosis).Google Scholar
(3) Sellards, A. W.The Principles of Acidosis and Clinical Methods for its Study.Google Scholar
(4) Other books referred to: (a) Cole, S. W., Practical Physiological Chemistry, (b) Macleod, .—Physiological Biochemistry, (c) Journal of Bacteriology, vol. ii, Clark & Lubs.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.