Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:44:02.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of Fingerpaintings in the Clinical Evaluation of Psychotic Conditions: a Quantitative and Qualitative Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. E. Lehmann  and
F. A. Risquez
H. E. Lehmann
Affiliation:
Verdun Protestant Hospital; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal
F. A. Risquez
Affiliation:
Caracas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Paintings and drawings of emotionally and mentally disturbed persons have been the subject of many psychological and psychiatric investigations. The psychological evaluation of graphic art can probably be considered as the oldest “projective” technique. Paintings and drawings have been systematically studied by psychologists and psychiatrists from three different aspects: 1, As indicators of the developmental stage reached in perceptual, motor and intellectual functions (Goodenough, 1926; Graewe, 1932; Bender, 1938; Gesell and Ames, 1946).

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 417 , October 1953 , pp. 763 - 777
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allesch, G. von, “Die æsthetische Erscheinungsweise der Farben. (Esthetic Phenomenology of Colours),” Psychol. Forsch., 1925, 6, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschuler, and Hattwick, , Painting and Personality, 1947. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A., and Foley, J., “A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behaviour in the Abnormal. (I. Historical and Theoretical Background),” J. Gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem , “A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behaviour in the Abnormal. (II. Approaches and Interrelationships),” ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1941, 42, 1.Google Scholar
Iidem , “A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behaviour in the Abnormal. (III. Spontaneous Productions),” Psychol. Monogr., 1940, 52, 71.Google Scholar
Iidem , “A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behaviour in the Abnormal. (IV. Experimental Investigations),” J. Gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslow, J., and Kadis, A., “Fingerpainting in the Psychotherapy of Children,” Am. J. Orthopsychiat., 1946, 16, 134.Google Scholar
Bell, J., Projective Techniques; A Dynamic Approach to the Study of Personality, 1948. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Bender, L., A Visual Motor Gestalt Test and Its Clinical Use, 1938. Research Monogr., No. 3. New York: American Orthopsychiat. Assoc.Google Scholar
Blum, L., and Dragositz, A., “Fingerpainting: The Developmental Aspects,” Child Developm., 1947, 18, 88.Google Scholar
Buck, J., “The H-T-P Technique: A Qualitative and Quantitative Scoring Technique,” J. Clin. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl., 1948, No. 5.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, N., “Individual and Social Factors in the Development of Graphic Symbolization,” J. Psychol., 1938, 5, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claude, H., and Masquin, P., “L'évolution du dessin chez un paralytique général avant et après malariatherapie. (Evolution of Artistic Design in a General Paralytic Before and after Malaria Therapy),” Annales Méd.-Psychol. (pt. 1.) 1934, 92, 356.Google Scholar
Cockrell, D., “Design in the Paintings of Young Children,” Sch. Arts., 1930, 30, 112.Google Scholar
Dörken, H. Jr., “The Objective Rating, Reliability and Validity of Spontaneous Finger-paintings.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychological Association of the Province of Quebec, Montreal, (November) 1952.Google Scholar
Idem, and Kral, V., “The Psychological Differentiation of Organic Brain Lesions and Their Localization by Means of the Rorschach Test,” Am. J. Psychiat., 1952, 108, 764.Google Scholar
Elkisch, P., “Children's Drawings in a Projective Technique,” Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 58, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerth, G., “Zeichenstörung bei Patienten mit Autotopagnosie. (Disorders of Drawing in Patients with Autotopagnosia),” Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1933, 143, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findley, W., “Factor Analysis of a Short-item Drawing Test,” Psychol. Bull., 1936, 33, 605.Google Scholar
Fingert, H., Kagan, J., and Schilder, P., “The Goodenough Test in Insulin and Metrazol Treatment of Schizophrenia,” J. Genet. Psychol., 1939, 21, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, J., “Observations on the Use of Fingerpainting in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Personality Disorders,” Char. and Pers., 1940, 8, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesell, H., and Ames, L., “The Development of Directionality in Drawing,” J. Genet. Psychol., 1946, 68, 45.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodenough, F., The Measurement of Intelligence by Drawing, 1926. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar
Idem , “Studies in the Psychology of Children's Drawings,” Psychol. Bull., 1928, 25, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem, and Harris, D., “Studies in the Psychology of Children's Drawings. II.”, 1928–49, ibid., 1950, 47, 369.Google Scholar
Graewe, H., Untersuchung der Entwicklung des Zeichnens. (A Study of the Development of Drawing), 1932, Halle: Herman Schroedel.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E., and Maclay, W. S., “Clinical Observations on Schizophrenic Drawings,” Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1937, 16, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartenstein, E., “Aktuelle Kulturinhalte im Spiegel der Kinderzeichnung. (Actual Manifestations of Culture in the Mirror of Children's Drawings),” Z. Jugendk., 1934, 4, 106.Google Scholar
Hetherington, R., “The Effects of Electro-Convulsive Therapy on the Drawings of Depressed Patients,” J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdlicka, A., “Art and Literature in the Mentally Abnormal,” Am. J. Insanity, 1899, 55, 385.Google Scholar
Hurlock, E., and Thomson, J., “Children's Drawings: An Experimental Study of Perception,” Child Developm., 1934, 5, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, S., “Colour Preference in the Insane,” J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1931, 26, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, Y., and Naka, Y., “(Studies on the Ability to Draw)” Kyoiku Shinri Kenkyu, 1939, 14, 509, 581, 749. (Psychol. Abstr., 1940, 14, 3090.) Google Scholar
Lange, B., “Zur Psychologie des Zeichenunterrichts. (The Educational Psychology of Drawing),” Int. Z. Indiv.-Psychol., 1933, 11, 295.Google Scholar
Lewis, N., “The Practical Value of Graphic Art in Personality Studies. (I. An Introductory Presentation of the Possibilities),” Psychoanal. Rev., 1925, 12, 316.Google Scholar
Machover, K., Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure, 1949. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Maclay, L., Guttmann, E., and Mayer-Gross, W., “Spontaneous Drawings as an Approach to Some Problems of Psychopathology.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1938, 31. 1337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohr, F., “Ueber Zeichnungen von Geisteskranken und ihre diagnostische Verwertbarkeit. (Drawings of the Mentally Ill and their Diagnostic Evaluation),” J. f. Psychol. u. Neurol., 1906–07, 8, 99.Google Scholar
Idem , “Das Künstlerisches Schaffen Geisteskranker und seine Beziehungen zum Verlauf der Krankheit. (The Artistic Work of Psychotics and Its Relation to the Course of Disease),” Schw. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1940, 45, 427.Google Scholar
Morgenthaler, W., “Einiges über Paralytikerzeichnungen. (Comments on Drawings of Patients with Dementia Paralytica),” ibid., 1922, 10, 321 Google Scholar
Mosse, E., “Painting Analysis in the Treatment of Neurosis,” Psvchoanal. Rev., 1940, 27, 65.Google Scholar
Idem , “Colour Therapy,” Occ. Ther. Rehab., 1942, 21, 33.Google Scholar
Napoli, P., “Fingerpainting and Personality Diagnosis,” Gen. Psychol. Monogr., 1946, 34, 129.Google Scholar
Idem , “Interpretive Aspects of Fingerpainting,” J. Psychol., 1947, 23, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Fingerpainting: A Bibliography,” Sch. Arts, 1947, 46, 208.Google Scholar
Naumberg, M., “The Psychodynamics of the Art Expression of a Boy Patient with Tic Syndrome,” Nerv. Child., 1945, 4, 374.Google Scholar
Pfister, H., “Farbe und Bewegung in der Zeichnung Geisteskranker. (Colour and Movements in the Drawings of Mental Patients),” Schw. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1934, 34, 325.Google Scholar
Phillips, E., and Stromberg, E., “A Comparative Study of Fingerpainting Performance in Detention Home and High School Pupils,” J. Psychol., 1948, 26, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinzhorn, H., Bildnerei der Geisteskranken, 1923. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Robertson, J., “Use of Colour in the Paintings of Psychotics,” J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rorschach, H., “Analytische Bemerkungen über das Gemälde eines Schizophrenen. (Analytic Comments on the Painting of a Schizophrenic),” Ztrlbl. f. Psychoanal., 1913, 3, 270.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, L., and Durbin, L., “Fingerpainting as an Investigative Approach to Therapeutic Techniques,” Occ. Ther. Rehab., 1945, 24, 1.Google Scholar
Schilder, R., and Levine, E., “Abstract Art as an Expression of Human Problems,” J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1942, 95, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidl-Waehner, T., “Formal Criteria for the Analysis of Children's Drawings,” Am. J. Orthopsychiat., 1942, 12, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R., Fingerpainting. 1938. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Staples, R., “Responses of Infants to Colour,” J. Exp. Psychol., 1932, 15, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, C., and Meier, N., “Artistic Ability and General Intelligence,” Psychol. Monogr., 1936, 48, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traube, T., “La Valeur Diagnostique des Dessins des Enfants Diffiçiles. (The Diagnostic Value of Drawings of Problem Children),” Arch. Psychol. (Genève), 1937, 26, 285.Google Scholar
Waehner, T., “Interpretations of Spontaneous Drawings and Paintings,” Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1946, 33, 3.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.