Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:52:49.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Black economic power and nation-building in post-apartheid South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2004

Okechukwu C. Iheduru
Affiliation:
James Madison College, Michigan State University.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the evolution and the implementation of the ANC government's commitment to fostering a black capitalist class or black economic empowerment (BEE) as a non-racial nation-building strategy. A substantial black bourgeois i.e. and other middle classes begun to emerge over the last decade, contrary to popular perceptions. The legitimating role assigned to the emergent black bourgeoisie by the ANC and the government is, however, threatens to turn the strategy into a nepotistic accumulation. This development is paradoxically threatening to re-racialise the country, widening black inequality gaps, and precluding the rise of a black bourgeoisie with a nurture capitalist agenda. Other equally powerful social groups have begun to challenge the prevailing strategy, compelling the government to explore a more accommodating strategy exemplified by the recent introduction by the government of ‘broad-based economic empowerment’. Should a less patrimonial, less racially and ethnically divisive BEE strategy emerge from this quasi-pluralist power play, such a change holds prospects for the creation of a ‘growth coalition’ capable of sustainable capitalist development and true empowerment of the black majority. That would be a positive development in terms of establishing and consolidating democracy in South Africa.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research for this study was funded by a Fulbright-Hays Faculty Research Abroad Fellowship in South Africa in 2000–01. Institutional affiliations with the Africa Institute of Southern Africa, Pretoria, and the Department of Political Studies at both Rhodes University and Rand Afrikaans University are gratefully acknowledged. The author also wishes to thank the various anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments, and the editor, Christopher Clapham, for his patience. His gratitude also goes to Dr Sam Motsuenyane, Peter Vundla, Lott Ndlovu, Louisa Mojela, Salukazi Dakile-Hlongwane, Tania Slabbert, Omano Edigheji and Dr Nthato Motlana for their time and encouragement.