Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:11:26.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Collision Risk Model for a Crossin Track Separation Methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

D. Anderson
Affiliation:
(Airservices Australia)
X. G. Lin
Affiliation:
(Airservices Australia)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Mayo, P. (1995). Development of proposals for amendment of the PANS-RAC (DOC 4444) concerning lateral and longitudinal separation minima in the RNP environment. ICAO the Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel (RGCSP) WG/A WP/17, Gold Coast.Google Scholar
2Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems - separation standards: I. This Journal, 19, 8898.Google Scholar
3Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems - separation standards. II. This Journal, 19, 169186.Google Scholar
4Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems - separation standards: III. This Journal, 19, 331347.Google Scholar
5Hsu, D. A. (1981). The evaluation of aircraft collision probabilities at intersecting air routes. This Journal, 34, 78102.Google Scholar
6Rome, H. J. and Kalafus, R. (1988). Impact of automatic dependent surveillance and navigation system accuracy on collision risk on intersecting tracks. Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting. Santa Barbara, 213222.Google Scholar
7Karppinen, N. and Anderson, D. (1995). Appendix for airspace planning methodology guidance material: determination of longitudinal distance based separation minima. ICAO RGCSP WG/A WP/5, Brussels.Google Scholar
8Anderson, D. and Karppinen, N. (1994). A collision risk analysis of data from the Oakland and Pacific areas. ICAO RGCSP WG/A WP/15, Shizuoka.Google Scholar
9Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied Mathematics Series 55, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar