Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:53:17.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-time differential GPS/GLONASS trials in Europe using all-in-view 20-channel receivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

S. Capaccio ,
D. Lowe ,
D. M. A. Walsh  and
P. Daly
S. Capaccio
Affiliation:
(CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, The University of Leeds)
D. Lowe
Affiliation:
(CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, The University of Leeds)
D. M. A. Walsh
Affiliation:
(CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, The University of Leeds)
P. Daly
Affiliation:
(CAA Institute of Satellite Navigation, The University of Leeds)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Following the initial development of 20-channel, all-in-view Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), GPS/GLONASS/Inmarsat-3, receivers at the Institute of Satellite Navigation (ISN), University of Leeds, a modification programme has been undertaken to allow real-time differential corrections to be sent from one 20-channel receiver to another identical receiver using a serial link between them. The differential correction software incorporates the RTCM SC-104 and RTCA DO-217 format developed specifically for GPS and adjusted by the ISN to allow simultaneous GLONASS operation.

After successful laboratory testing, real-time differential GNSS tests were successfully completed in static mode between Aberdeen and Leeds via the SkyFix differential data-link, and in dynamic mode at DTEO Boscombe Down using a C-band data-link between the ground and a receiver on board the DRA BAC 1–11 aircraft. The aims of the tests were, (i) to demonstrate real-time differential GNSS position-fixing, (ii) to establish the accuracy improvements brought about, and (iii) to examine the effects of data-link latency and satellite PDOP on the solution accuracy.

Keywords

1. Satellite navigation.2. Differential systems.3. GNSS.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 193 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Breeuwer, E. J., et al. (1995). Design, Test and Evaluation of a CAT IIIB C-band DGPS Data Link. International Symposium on Precision Approach and Automatic Landing (Braunschweig, Germany), Feb. 21–24, 83–90.Google Scholar
2Capaccio, S. and Walsh, D. (1996). Results of GPS and GLONASS real-time differential positioning over a 370 km baseline. Civil Aviation Authority Institute of Satellite Navigation (Leeds, UK), Jan.Google Scholar
3Capaccio, S., et al. (1996). Real time differential GPS/GLONASS trials in Europe using all-in-view 20-channel receivers. Civil Aviation Authority Institute of Satellite Navigation (Leeds, UK), Oct.Google Scholar
4Kelly, R. J. and LaBerge, E. F. C. (1990). MLS: A Total System Approach. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 5, no. 5, May, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Markin, K. R.et al.(1994). Availability Assessment of Alternative Precision Approach and Landing System Architectures, CAASD MP94W08, The MITRE Corporation, (McLean, VA, USA).Google Scholar
6Mistry, H. (1996). Personal communication (based upon DOC NO. 1779–1001, Project Heathrow (CAA) Tender D/KF0000/38).Google Scholar
7Offermans, G. W. A., et al. (1996). Evaluation of DGNSS Datalinks for CAT-III Landings, 5th International Conference on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems (St. Petersburg, Russia), May 20–24, 1–8.Google Scholar
8Parkinson, B. W. and Enge, P. K. (1996). Differential GPS. In Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 164 (Washington, USA), 3–49.Google Scholar
9Raby, P. (1994). Integrating Signal Information from GPS and GLONASS Navigation Systems. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, 33–42.Google Scholar
10Rowson, S., et al. (1994). Performance of Cat IIIB Automatic landings Using C/A code Tracking Differential GPS. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, Summer, pp. 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11RTCA (1995). Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards DGNSS Instrument Approach System: Special Category 1 (SCAT I), RTCA/DO-217, April 19, Appendix A. 1–24.Google Scholar
12RTCM (1994). RTCM Recommended Standards for differential NAVSTAR GPS Service – Version 2.1, RTCM Special Committee No. 104, Jan. 3, 4.1–4.50.Google Scholar
13Van Graas, F., et al. (1995). FAA/Ohio University/UPS Autoland Flight Test Results, ION National Technical Meeting, Anaheim, January, 145–156.Google Scholar
14Walsh, D. (1995). A feasibility study of category III precision approach and landing using GPS, GLONASS and Pseudolites. Civil Aviation Authority Institute of Satellite Navigation, (Leeds, U.K.), May.Google Scholar