Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:29:21.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An A.T.C. Survey of North Atlantic Navigation Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper discusses a method for determining the collision risk implicit in horizontal and vertical separation standards which has been developed in the U.K. in accordance with Recommendation 7/1 of the RAC/OPS Divisional meeting. The acceptable collision risk for the North Atlantic is assessed; this must be related to airworthiness criteria and an accident rate of one in ten million is adopted. It is concluded that no immediate change in separation standards can safely be made but that the standard of navigation should be improved to allow a 90 n.m. standard; that with more data a 1000- or 500-ft. vertical separation may prove to be safe; and that longitudinal separation standards require further study. The improvement in traffic capacity which would result from changes in separation standards is also considered.

This and the following nine papers were presented at the 16th I.A.T.A. Technical Conference, of which a report appears opposite. An analysis of long-range air traffic systems made by the Mathematics Department of the Royal Aircraft Establishment for the Ministry of Aviation was presented in several preliminary papers at the Conference. These studies will be described in a series of papers specially prepared for the Journal.

Type
I.A.T.A. Technical Conference
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 411 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Reich, P. G. (1964). A theory of safe separation for air traffic control. R.A.E. Tech. Report 64041. (Part I of R.A.E. studies of separation standards and collision risk.)Google Scholar
2 Reich, P. G. (1964). An analysis of aircraft proximity and its relation to collision risk, with special reference to the North Atlantic Region 1965–71. R.A.E. Tech. Report 64042. (Part II of R.A.E. studies of separation standards and collision risk.)Google Scholar
3 Reich, P. G. (1964). Separation standards in the North Atlantic Region 1965–71 in the light of recent measurements of flying errors. R.A.E. Tech. 64043. Report (Part III of R.A.E. studies of separation standards and collision risk.)Google Scholar
4 Operation Accordion Vol. I, 04 1964. Report No. RD-64-52, I Federal Aviation Agency.Google Scholar
5 Kobrick, J. J. and Bentley, Barbara S. (1963) Random deviations from stabilized cruise altitudes of commercial transports at altitudes up to 40,000 feet with autopilot in altitude hold. N.A.S.A. TN D—1950.Google Scholar
6 Report on the Second Informal Meeting of the Aviation Authorities of the North Atlantic A.T.C. Provider States. (Miami Beach, 4–15 Nov. 1963.)Google Scholar
7 Doppler/Loran A trials, 1963–64. DCP Paper No. 55. M.O.A./B.O.A.C.Google Scholar
8 Report on vertical separation study—North Atlantic Region, 15 July to 30 September, 1963. (I.A.T.A. D.O.C. GEN/1951).Google Scholar
9 Marks, B. L. Air traffic control separation standards, and collision risk. R.A.E. Tech. Note Math. 91.Google Scholar