Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:51:10.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Risk of Collision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2005

Ian McGeoch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Edmund Hadnett writing in his article AIS at the Front Line in the May 2005 issue of the Journal, attributes to me the argument that ‘the automatic radar plotting aid (ARPA) should remain the principal means of assessing a risk of collision’. ARPA has never been the principal means of assessing a risk of collision and I have never argued that it has been and should remain so. My argument concerns the merits respectively of ARPA and AIS as navaids or a fusion of data from both.

Keywords

AISARPACollision Risk
Type
Forum
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 169 - 172
Copyright
© 2006 The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)