Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:55:16.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Comparison of Driving Performance Using a Portable Navigation System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Wen-Chen Lee ,
Mi-Chia Ma  and
Bor-Wen Cheng
Wen-Chen Lee*
Affiliation:
(National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan)
Mi-Chia Ma
Affiliation:
(National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan)
Bor-Wen Cheng
Affiliation:
(National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan)
*
(Email: g9421806@yuntech.edu.tw)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent work has revealed that increasing numbers of drivers now receive driving instructions using a portable navigation system. A 2×2×2 (position×display decrease mode×voice) factorial experiment was executed to compare driving performance when using a portable navigation system (PNS). Thirty-two subjects were paid to participate in this field study, and a smart phone was adopted as the portable navigation device. The results indicated that drivers using the PNS under the conditions up position and with voice instruction performed better in terms of trip duration, mean speed, and the standard deviation of speed.

Keywords

portable navigation systemsmart phonedriving performancecar safety
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chae, M. and Kim, J. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(3), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornan, M. (2005). Europe's In-Car Navigation market: Mapping the route to success. Automotive Research Report, Gartner, Inc, Stamford, 8P.Google Scholar
Dingus, T. A., Hulse, M. C., Mollenhauer, M. A., Fleischman, R. N., Mcgehee, D. V. and Manakkal, N. (1997). Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveller information systems. Human Factors, 39, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eby, D. W. and Kostyniuk, L. P. (1999). An on-the-road comparison of in-vehicle navigation assistance systems. Human Factors, 41(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, J., Johansson, E. and Ostlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, R. L. (1990). In-vehicle navigation-status and safety impacts. Technical Papers from ITE's 1990, 1989, and 1988 Conference, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, DC, 226–235.Google Scholar
Green, P. (1999). The 15-second rule for driver information systems. Proceedings of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America Conference (CD-ROM), Intelligent Transportation Society of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Harms, L. and Patten, C. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction. A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research Part F, 6, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooey, B. L. and Gore, B. F. (1998). Advanced traveler information systems and commercial vehicle operations components of the intelligent transportation systems: head-up displays and driver attention for navigation information. FHWA-RD-96-153, US department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
Iino, T., Otsuka, T. and Suzuki, Y. (1988). Development of heads-up display for motor vehicle. Paper 880217, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, 15–23.Google Scholar
Jamson, A. H. and Merat, N. (2005). Surrogate in-vehicle information systems and driver behaviour: Effects of visual and cognitive load in simulated rural driving. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptein, N. A. (1994). Benefits of in-car head-up displays. TNO report TNO-TM 1994 B-20, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kato, H., Ito, H., Shima, J., Imaizumi, M. and Shibata, H. (1992). Development of hologram head-up display. SAE Technical Report Paper No. 920600. Society of Automobile Engineers, Warrendale, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, R. J. (1991). Effect of a head-up versus head-down digital speedometer on visual sampling behavior and speed control performance during daytime automobile driving. Paper 910111, Society of Automotive Engineers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labiale, G. (1990). In-car road information: comparisons of auditory and visual presentations, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34 thAnnual Meeting, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, 623–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansdown, T. C. (1997). Visual allocation and the availability of driver information. Pergamon, 215–223.Google Scholar
Lee, W. C. and Cheng, B. W. (2008). Effects of using a portable navigation system and paper map in real driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y. C. and Wen, M. H. (2004). Comparison of head-up display (HUD) vs. Head-down display (HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 679–697.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. C. (2001). Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveler information systems. Ergonomics, 44(4), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, A. J., Ross, T. and Bayer, S. H. (2005). Incorporating Landmarks in Driver Navigation System Design: An Overview of Results from the REGIONAL Project. The Journal of Navigation, 58, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, W. A. and Hoffmann, E. R. (1980). Review of relationships between steering wheel reversal rate and driving task demand. Human Factors, 22, 733–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, A. M. and Coleman, N. (1990). Route guidance systems: A comparison of methods of presenting directional information to the driver. Contemporary Ergonomics, Taylor & Frances, 480–485.Google Scholar
Schager, B. (2008). When technology leads us astray: a broadened view of human error. The Journal of Navigation, 61, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J., Alicandri, E., Sedney, C. and Roberts, K. (1991). In-vehicle navigation devices: Effects on the safety of driver performance. Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings, Warrendale, 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (2000). Human factors in vector map design: the importance of task-display dependence. The Journal of Navigation, 53, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierwille, W. W. (1995). Development of an initial model relating driver in-vehicle visual demands to accident rate. Proceedings of the Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1–7.Google Scholar
Zwahlen, H. T., Adams, C. C. Jr., and DeBald, D. P. (1988). Safety aspects of CRT panel controls in automobiles. Vision in Vehicle II, Elsevier, 335–344.Google Scholar