Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:16:06.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-Integrity GPS/INS Integrated Navigation with Error Detection and Application to LAAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2011

Fang-Cheng Chan  and
Boris Pervan
Fang-Cheng Chan*
Affiliation:
(Illinois Institute of Technology)
Boris Pervan
Affiliation:
(Illinois Institute of Technology)
*
(Email: chanfan@iit.edu.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A dynamic state realization for tightly coupling Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements with an Inertial Navigation System (INS) is described. The realization, based on the direct fusion of GPS and INS systems through Kalman filter state dynamics, explicitly accounts for temporal and spatial decorrelation of GPS measurement errors (such as tropospheric, ionospheric, and multipath errors) through state augmentation, thereby ensuring Kalman filter integrity under fault-free error conditions. Predicted system performance for a Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) aircraft precision approach application is evaluated using covariance analysis and validated with flight data.

Built-in fault detection mechanisms based on the Kalman filter innovations are also evaluated to help provide integrity under certain fault conditions. It is shown that an algorithm based on the integral of Kalman filter innovations outperforms other existing GPS fault detection methods in the detection of slowly developing ranging errors, such as those caused by ionospheric and tropospheric anomalies.

Keywords

GPSGPS/INS integrationLAAS applications
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 467 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cunningham, J. R. and Lewantowicz, Z. H. (1988). Dynamic Interaction of Separate INS/GPS Kalman Filters (Filter – Driving – Filter Dynamics). Proceeding of ION GPS 1988, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
Colombo, O. L., Bhapkar, U. V. and Evans, A. G. (1999). Inertial-Aided Cycle-Slip Detection/Correction for Precise, Long-Baseline Kinematic GPS. Proceedings ION GPS 1999, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. L. (2002–2003). GPS/INS-Streamlined. NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, vol. 49, no. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Y., Krakiwsky, E. J., Abousalem, M. A. and McLellan, J. F. (1993). Comparison and Analysis of Centralized, Decentralized, and Federated Filters. NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, vol. 40, no. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebre-Egziahber, D. (2001). Design and Performance Analysis of a Low-Cost Aided Dead Reckoning Navigator. Stanford University Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Gratton, L. and Pervan, B. (2006). Carrier Phase Airborne and Ground Monitors for Ionospheric Front Detection for Category III LAAS. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Groves, P. D. (2008). Principle of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Artech House.Google Scholar
Heo, M.-B., Pervan, B., Pullen, S., Gautier, J., Enge, P. and Gebre-Egziabher, D. (2004). Autonomous Fault Detection with Carrier-Phase DGPS for Shipboard Landing Navigation. NAVIGATION: Journal of Institute of Navigation, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heo, M.-B. and Pervan, B. (2006). Carrier Phase Navigation Architecture for Shipboard Relative GPS. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42·2, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and van Graas, F. (2006). Comparison of Tropospheric Decorrelation Errors in the Presence of Severe Weather Conditions in Different Areas and Over Different Baseline Lengths. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Jekeli, C. (2001). Inertial Navigation Systems with Geodetic applications. Berlin, New York, Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. B. and Lewantowicz, Z. H. (1990). Closed-Loop Operation of GPS Aided INS. Proceedings of ION GPS 1990, Colorado Springs, CO.Google Scholar
Ko, P.-Y. (2000). GPS-Based Precision Approach and Landing Navigation: Emphasis on Inertial and Pseudolite Augmentation and Differential Ionosphere Effect. Stanford University Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. G. (1996). Aircraft Landing Using GPS: Development and Evaluation of a Real Time System for Kinematic Position using the Global Positioning System. Stanford University Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Luo, M., Pullen, S., Ene, A., Qiu, D., Walter, T. and Enge, P. (2004). Ionosphere Threat to LAAS: Updated Model, User Impact and Mitigations. Proceeding of ION GNSS 2004, Long beach, California.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. C. and O'Laughlin, D. G. (1999). A Performance Analysis of a Tightly Coupled GPS/Inertial System for Two Integrity Monitoring Methods. Proceedings of ION GPS 1999, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Luo, M. and Pullen, S. (2006). Position-Domain Geometry Screening to Maximize LAAS Availability in the Presence of Ionosphere Anomalies. Proceeding of ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, Texas.Google Scholar
Marty, F. and Pagnucco, S. (1992). Development of Small Embedded GPS/INS RLG and FOG Systems for the 90' and Beyond. Proceedings of ION National Technical conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
McGraw, G., Murphy, T., Brenner, M., Pullen, S. and Van Dierendonck, A. J. (2000). Development of the LAAS Accuracy Models. Proceedings of ION GPS 2000, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Moafipoor, S., Brzezinska, D. G. and Toth, C. K. (2004). Tightly Coupled GPS/INS/CCD Integration Based on GPS Carrier Phase Velocity Update. Proceedings of the 2004 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Pervan, B., Chan, F.-C., Gebre-Egziabher, D., Pullen, S., Enge, P. and Colby, G. (2003). Performance Analysis of Carrier-Phase DGPS Navigation for Shipboard Landing of Aircraft. NAVIGATION: Journal of Institute of Navigation, vol. 50, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RTCA Special Committee 159 (2004). Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for The Local Area Augmentation System. RTCA Document Number DO-245A.Google Scholar
RTCA Special Committee 159 Working Group 2 (2006). Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System/Wide Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. RTCA Document Number DO-229D.Google Scholar
Scherzinger, B. M. (2000). Precise Robust Positioning with Inertial/GPS RTK. Proceedings of ION GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
Soltz, J. A., Donna, J. I. and Greenspan, R. L. (1988–1989). An Option for Mechanizing Integrated GPS/INS Solutions. NAVIGATION: Journal of The Institute of Navigation, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titterton, D. and Weston, J. L. (2004). Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauticcs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US DoT FAA (2002). Category I Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility, FAA-E-2937A.Google Scholar