Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:55:37.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Element and Accidents in Greek Shipping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Ernestos Tzannatos
Ernestos Tzannatos*
Affiliation:
(University of Piraeus – Department of Maritime Studies)
*
(Email: et@unipi.gr)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the significance of the human element in accidents involving Greek-flagged ships, during 1993–2006, worldwide. In this context, the human element as a general factor of accident initiation and most importantly its constituent components, in the form of specific onboard duties (functions) and/or off-board (mainly ashore) entities, were presented and analysed. It was found that 57·1% of all accidents were attributed to the human element, whereas 75·8% of the latter were detected onboard and 80·4% of the onboard human-induced accidents were linked to errors and violations of the ship's master. Furthermore, since the timeframe examined covers the implementation of the ISM Code, the current analysis was aimed at producing valuable information with regard to its effectiveness upon Greek shipping. In this respect, a 12·2% reduction of human-caused accidents has been found during the post-ISM period. Finally, the association between specific accident types and human element components was examined utilising the technique of correspondence analysis and it was found that groundings and collisions were closely related to the ship's Master, whereas mechanical failures and fires were associated with the engine officers, and cargo shifts and flooding with bridge officers.

Keywords

Human elementShipping accidentsISM CodeGreek shipping
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 119 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akten, N., (2004). Analysis of Shipping Causalties in the Bosphorus, The Journal of Navigation 57, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. C. and Seah, A. K. (2004) Maritime Accidents and Human Performance: The Statistical Trial. MARTECH 2004, 22–24 September, Singapore.Google Scholar
Grech, M. R., Horberry, T. and Koester, T. (2008), Human Factors in the Maritime Domain, Published by CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, C., Flin, R. and Mearns, K. (2006), Safety in shipping: The human element, Journal of Safety Research, 37, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, S. (2005), Designing Usable Marine Interfaces: Some Issues and Constraints, The Journal of Navigation, 58, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, R. V., Sherwood Jones, B. M., (2002). Managing the Human Element in Modern Ship Design and Operation, Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psaraftis, H. N., Caridis, P., Desypris, N., Panagakos, G. and Ventikos, N. (1998), The Human Element as a Factor in Marine Accidents, IMLA-10 Conference, St. Malo, France.Google Scholar
Tzannatos, E. (2005), Technical reliability of the Greek coastal passenger fleet, Marine Policy, 29:1, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzannatos, E. (2002), GMDSS Operability: The Operator-Equipment Interface, The Journal of Navigation, 55, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittingham, R. B. (2004) The Blame Machine: Why Human Error Causes Accidents. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar