Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:52:14.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Navstar GPS – Charting Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Nigel R. L. Gooding
Affiliation:
Hydrographic Office

Abstract

The historical development of positioning in relation to the nautical chart is very briefly described. Present nautical charts are largely based on geodetic surveys which date from the 19th and early 20th century. This gave rise to the use of many local datums and there has been a need to provide the mariner with information to enable him to transfer his position from one chart to an adjacent one on a different datum. The sizes of discrepancies in position between various datums are given. The availability of the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) datum enables positioning on a single worldwide datum to become a reality. The important factors affecting the adoption of WGS 84 as the datum for nautical charts, namely data availability and the practical and political considerations, are discussed. The importance of the proper consideration of datum in relation to new developments in the use of nautical charts is also mentioned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Defense Mapping Agency of the United States of America. Technical Report, DMA TR 8350.2, World Geodetic System 1984.Google Scholar
2 International Hydrographic Organization Circular Letters 28/1988, dated 15 July 1988; and 34/1989, dated 26 June 1989, Transformation Notes – WGS 84.Google Scholar
3 International Hydrographic Organization Special Publication No. 52, Provisional Specifications for Chart Content And Display Aspects of ECDIS, April 1991.Google Scholar