Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:06:13.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radionavigation at a Time of Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

David Last
David Last
Affiliation:
(University of Wales, Bangor)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper and the following 5 papers were presented at the Institute's RIN-96 Conference, held at the University of Southampton, in September 1996. Copies of the complete Proceedings may be obtained from the Director. Price £6 members, £8.50 non-members.

This is a time of unprecedented change in radio-navigation systems and practices. The rapid development of satellite technology is challenging navigation authorities in every country to question the future of terrestrial navigation systems. The technical adequacy of the new techniques is being demonstrated in many applications but there remain serious questions concerning the reliability, integrity and political control of the current satellite systems and their long-term future.

The paper describes the operational principles of the present satellite Global Positioning System (GPS) and GLONASS. It compares them with terrestrial aids, identifying their advantages and drawbacks. Accuracy, availability and integrity are considered. The reasons for the development of differential operation are examined.

Finally, the paper looks at the future of satellite systems and addresses some of the difficult institutional issues concerning satellite navigation with which navigation authorities worldwide are having to grapple. It reviews the development of the future Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and identifies the economic benefits it could bring.

Keywords

1. Radionavigation.2. Satellite navigation.
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 224 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1RTCA (1991). ‘Minimum operational performance standards for airborne supplemental navigation equipment using Global Positioning System’. SC-159, DO-2O8, RTCA Washington DC.Google Scholar
2McLendon Associates (1992). ‘GPS performance report: application for DME/P’. FAA Contract DTFA-03-89-C-00023, McLendon Ass., Bedford, TX, USA.Google Scholar
3Van Graas, F. and Farrell, J. L. (1991). Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM): techniques, performance and potential. Proc. 47th Ann. Meeting, ION.Google Scholar
4Grover Brown, R. (1992). ‘A baseline GPS RAIM scheme and a note on the equivalence of three methods’. J. ION, 39, Fall.Google Scholar
5Loh, R. (1993). FAA wide area integrity and differential GPS program, 2nd Intl. Conf. on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems DSNS 93, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
6US Coast Guard (1995). ‘GPS status at 19 September 1995’. USCG Navigation Center WWW page, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
7‘GLONASS constellation status’ (1995). Intergovernment Navigation & Information Center, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
8US Department of Defence and the Department of Transportation (1995). ‘United States 1994 Federal Radionavigation Plan’. DOT-VNTSC-RSPA-91-1 DOD-4650.J.Google Scholar
9Tiwari, A. & Weber, L. (1994). ‘The radio data system – a data link for DGPS’. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems (DSNS 94), London.Google Scholar
10RTCA, ‘Minimum operational performance standards (MOPS) for airborne navigation equipment using Global Positioning System (GPS)’. RTCA Inc., Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
11US Federal Aviation Administration (1992). ‘Technical Standing Order TSO-129C, Airborne supplemental navigation equipment using the Global Positioning System GPS ‘. FAA: Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
12‘GPS Growth to the Year 2000’. (1995). Navigation News (Royal Inst. Nav., London).Google Scholar
13Kasties, G. (1993). ‘Differential GPS in a land vehicle environment’. 2nd Intl. Conf. on Differential Satellite Navigation Systems DSNS 93, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
14RTCA (1992). ‘Task force report on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) transition and implementation strategy’. RTCA Inc., Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
15IMO (1992). ‘IMO Resolution A.666(16) concerning the adoption of world-wide radio navigation systems, continuity and responsibility’. International Maritime Organization, London, UK.Google Scholar
16US Federal Aviation Administration. (1993). ‘FAA satellite navigation programmaster plan FY93-98’, FAA R & D Service, Satellite Program Office. Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
17ICAO (1993). ‘Report of the GNSS ICAO-FANS Meeting’. London, UK.Google Scholar
18International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (1992). ‘ Policy on aids to navigation’. IALA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
19Loh, R., Lee, Y. C. & Wroblewski, P. J. (1991). ‘The potential application of GPS for precision approaches’. Mitre Corp., McLean, VA, USA WP91W00100, FAA Contract DTFA01-89-C00001.Google Scholar
20Green, G. B.et al. (1989). ‘The GPS 21-Primary satellite constellation’, Navigation (USA).Google Scholar
21Nisner, P. D. & Stevens, E. G. (1995). ‘Practical measurements of interference to GPS receivers in laboratory and aircraft environments’. ISPA 95 Intl. Symp. on Precision Approach & Automatic Landing, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
22UK Defence Research Agency. (1992). ‘A review of the interference and jamming resistance of SPS GPS receivers for aviation.’ Contract for UK Civil Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
23US Department of the Air Force. (1992). ‘Program Management Directive for NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (IWSM)’. PMD 4075(31)/PE35164F/35165F.Google Scholar
24The Analytic Sciences Corporation. (1991). ‘GPS role in precision approach’. Report No. SP-6288-3-1, Contract DTRS-57-89-C-00045, TASC Reading MA, USA.Google Scholar
25Beukers, J. M. (1995). ‘Civil versus military use of satellites for positioning and navigation’. 1st Intl. Radionav. Conf. on Planning for Global Radionavigation, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
26Allen, Booz & Hamilton, . (1994). ‘Satellite Constellation Simulation, vol. 1’, Reportfor UK Civil Aviation Authority, Contract No. 7D/S/1140.Google Scholar
27‘DoD/DoT talks get WAAS back on track’. GPS World, p. 18, April 1995.Google Scholar
28US GPS Industry Council. (1991). ‘Charter for Civil GPS Service Interface Committee (GPSIC)’.Google Scholar
29Beukers, J. M. (1993). ‘Administrative procedures and agreements governing global radionavigation’. 49th Ann. Tech. Meeting of Inst. of Nov., Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
30Blanchard, W. F. (1992). ‘Radionavigation – the outlook for Europe’. Luncheon Address, Ann. Tech. Symp., Wild Goose Assoc, Birmingham UK.Google Scholar
31Beukers, J. M. (1992). ‘Financial alternatives for global satellite navigation’. Proc. European Space Agency, International Space Year Conf., Munich, Germany, ISY-2.Google Scholar
32US General Accounting Office. (1990). ‘An unclassified overview of defence satellite programs and launch activities’. GAO/NSLAD-90-154FS.Google Scholar
33White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Fact Sheet. (1996). ‘US Global Positioning System Policy’.Google Scholar
34International Agreement concerning the establishment and operation of the Civil Loran-C System in North West Europe and the North Atlantic. (1992). Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
35Agreement on an international programme for the Joint Radionavigation Service in Far Eastern Waters using Loran-C and Chaika Stations. (1992).Google Scholar
36US State Department. (1991). ‘Response to formal request from the Norwegian government of 14 Nov 1991’, Research & Special Projects Dept., State Dept.Google Scholar
37Remarks by Busey, Admiral James H.. (1991). Administrator, US FAA to 10th Air Navigation Conf., Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar